Did Men of Song Belt Out "Tang Ci"? An Explanation of the Poem "I Only Fear the Spring Breeze Will Chop Me Apart"

IF 0.5 0 ASIAN STUDIES Tang Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.1353/tan.2022.0003
J. Tsung-i, David J. Lebovitz
{"title":"Did Men of Song Belt Out \"Tang Ci\"? An Explanation of the Poem \"I Only Fear the Spring Breeze Will Chop Me Apart\"","authors":"J. Tsung-i, David J. Lebovitz","doi":"10.1353/tan.2022.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay was originally published in Chinese in the 1990s by the polymathic Hong Kong scholar Jao Tsung-i 饒宗頤 (1917–2018), and exemplifies a larger debate about the Tang origins and identity of the ci genre that unfolded between Jao and Ren Bantang 任半塘 (1897–1991) in the late 1980's and early 1990's. Jao emphasizes the continuity between the term ci 詞 and its referent, which may be either \"lyrics\" to a tune, generally speaking, or a specific ci-genre of poetry. He argues, moreover, that Tang ci, and in particular the poems of the Yunyao ji 雲謠集 (Cloud ballad collection) discovered in Dunhuang manuscripts, are an integral part of ci-genre history; poems made to tunes and called ci in the Tang are inseparable from the genre that flourished as a literati form in the Song, and ci poetics is thus rooted firmly in Tang history. Placing the vernacular Tang ci on equal footing with literati Song ci is corollary to a larger historiographic shift that wrests authority from transmitted texts (official histories, critical anthologies, elite textual traditions) as the sole legitimate historical sources, and empowers manuscript sources to rewrite history.","PeriodicalId":41166,"journal":{"name":"Tang Studies","volume":"70 1","pages":"121 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tang Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tan.2022.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay was originally published in Chinese in the 1990s by the polymathic Hong Kong scholar Jao Tsung-i 饒宗頤 (1917–2018), and exemplifies a larger debate about the Tang origins and identity of the ci genre that unfolded between Jao and Ren Bantang 任半塘 (1897–1991) in the late 1980's and early 1990's. Jao emphasizes the continuity between the term ci 詞 and its referent, which may be either "lyrics" to a tune, generally speaking, or a specific ci-genre of poetry. He argues, moreover, that Tang ci, and in particular the poems of the Yunyao ji 雲謠集 (Cloud ballad collection) discovered in Dunhuang manuscripts, are an integral part of ci-genre history; poems made to tunes and called ci in the Tang are inseparable from the genre that flourished as a literati form in the Song, and ci poetics is thus rooted firmly in Tang history. Placing the vernacular Tang ci on equal footing with literati Song ci is corollary to a larger historiographic shift that wrests authority from transmitted texts (official histories, critical anthologies, elite textual traditions) as the sole legitimate historical sources, and empowers manuscript sources to rewrite history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“唐词”是宋人唱出来的吗?《只怕春风把我劈成碎片》这首诗解读
摘要:本文最初由博学的香港学者饶宗颐(1917-2018)于20世纪90年代以中文发表,并例证了在20世纪80年代末和90年代初饶宗颐和任半堂(1897-1991)之间展开的关于唐代词类起源和身份的更大争论。饶强调词与指称物之间的连续性,指称物通常可以是曲调的“歌词”,也可以是特定的词体裁。此外,他还认为,唐词,特别是敦煌手稿中发现的《云瑶集》(云歌集)中的诗歌,是词体史的一个组成部分;唐代的曲词与宋朝兴盛的文人体裁是分不开的,因此,词学深深扎根于唐代的历史。将白话文唐词与文人宋词置于同等地位,必然会导致更大的史学转变,即从传播文本(官方历史、批评选集、精英文本传统)中夺取权威,成为唯一合法的历史来源,并赋予手稿来源改写历史的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tang Studies
Tang Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Language of Táng Poetry as Entryway into the Spoken Language of the Táng: A Preliminary Exploration A Tale of Two Texts–––A New Philological Investigation of Dunhuang Manuscript P.2526 The Consolidation and Transmutation of the Zhenguan-era (627–649) Court Ideology of Wen 文 (Cultural Forms) Fifth Workshop of New Frontiers in the Study of Medieval China: On Funerary Inscriptions, Elling Eide Center, May 19–20, 2023 Romanticizing the Past through Beauty Practices: Reconstructing and Recontextualizing Zhuangtai ji 妝臺記 (Record of the Dressing Table)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1