Iris Posterior Synechiae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Eyes: Prevention and Management of Posterior Synechiae.

Yuji Kobashigawa, Toshiki Shimizu, T. Hayashi, Hiroko Kobashigawa, Kentaro Yuda, N. Mizuki, Norihiro Yamada, Naoko Kato
{"title":"Iris Posterior Synechiae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Eyes: Prevention and Management of Posterior Synechiae.","authors":"Yuji Kobashigawa, Toshiki Shimizu, T. Hayashi, Hiroko Kobashigawa, Kentaro Yuda, N. Mizuki, Norihiro Yamada, Naoko Kato","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo evaluate the efficacy of a mydriatic agent for posterior synechiae after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (staged DMEK).\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this prospective study, the outcomes of DMEK with or without mydriasis (0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride [Mydrin-P; Santen, Osaka, Japan]) after the DMEK procedure were analyzed. Patients underwent IOL implantation approximately 4 weeks before DMEK. Six months after DMEK, the iris posterior synechiae severity score was evaluated based on the extent of posterior synechiae affecting the eight areas (45° each) of the pupillary rim (posterior synechiae score; grades 0-8). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, axial length, and the amount of air at the end of the surgery were also evaluated.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifteen eyes of 15 patients (mydriatic: n=8, control: n=7) were eligible for inclusion. Iris posterior synechiae were detected in all seven eyes (100.0%) in the control group, whereas they were noted in two eyes in the mydriatic group (25%). The mean iris posterior synechiae score was 0.69±1.20 in the mydriatic group and was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.57±0.90; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in other clinical factors. Although the incidence and scores of posterior synechiae in the control group were higher, the incidence was significantly reduced with the use of a mydriatic agent (in the mydriatic group).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nUse of a mydriatic agent is an effective measure to prevent postoperative synechiae after DMEK.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of a mydriatic agent for posterior synechiae after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (staged DMEK). METHODS In this prospective study, the outcomes of DMEK with or without mydriasis (0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride [Mydrin-P; Santen, Osaka, Japan]) after the DMEK procedure were analyzed. Patients underwent IOL implantation approximately 4 weeks before DMEK. Six months after DMEK, the iris posterior synechiae severity score was evaluated based on the extent of posterior synechiae affecting the eight areas (45° each) of the pupillary rim (posterior synechiae score; grades 0-8). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, axial length, and the amount of air at the end of the surgery were also evaluated. RESULTS Fifteen eyes of 15 patients (mydriatic: n=8, control: n=7) were eligible for inclusion. Iris posterior synechiae were detected in all seven eyes (100.0%) in the control group, whereas they were noted in two eyes in the mydriatic group (25%). The mean iris posterior synechiae score was 0.69±1.20 in the mydriatic group and was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.57±0.90; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in other clinical factors. Although the incidence and scores of posterior synechiae in the control group were higher, the incidence was significantly reduced with the use of a mydriatic agent (in the mydriatic group). CONCLUSIONS Use of a mydriatic agent is an effective measure to prevent postoperative synechiae after DMEK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚洲眼视网膜内皮角膜移植术后虹膜后粘连:后粘连的预防和处理。
目的评价超声乳化人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)后粘连的治疗效果。方法在这项前瞻性研究中,DMEK伴或不伴散丝(0.5% tropicamide和0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride [Mydrin-P;Santen,大阪,日本])在DMEK程序后进行分析。患者在DMEK前约4周行人工晶体植入术。DMEK后6个月,根据瞳孔边缘8个区域(各45°)的虹膜后粘连程度评估虹膜后粘连严重程度评分(后粘连评分;成绩主。最佳眼镜矫正视力、角膜中央厚度、内皮细胞密度、轴向长度和手术结束时的空气量也被评估。结果15例患者15只眼符合纳入标准,其中近视患者8只眼,对照组7只眼。对照组7只眼(100.0%)均见虹膜后粘连,而散瞳组2只眼(25%)见虹膜后粘连。实验组虹膜后粘连评分平均为0.69±1.20,显著低于对照组(4.57±0.90;P < 0.001)。其他临床因素差异无统计学意义。虽然对照组的后粘连发生率和评分较高,但使用松解剂(松解组)后粘连发生率显著降低。结论使用止血剂是预防DMEK术后粘连的有效措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Acremonium Species Positive Keratitis Managed in a Tertiary Eye Care Center Efficacy of the Image-Guided Alignment System for a Four-Haptic Hydrophobic Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lens Evaluation of Ocular Surface Characteristics in Dry Eye Disease With and Without Soft Contact Lens Wear: A Comparative Study Change in Risk Score and Behaviors of Soft Contact Lens Wearers After Targeted Patient Education Corneal Response to Scleral Contact Lens Wear in Keratoconus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1