Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica Pub Date : 2017-12-30 DOI:10.24916/iansa.2017.2.6
Giovanna Bosi, G. Barbieri, A. Florenzano, E. Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, E. Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, C. Zanasi
{"title":"Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education","authors":"Giovanna Bosi, G. Barbieri, A. Florenzano, E. Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, E. Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, C. Zanasi","doi":"10.24916/iansa.2017.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale is an open-air museum dedicated to the enhancement of the Bronze Age terramare culture of Northern Italy. Investigation of its rich archaeological record, particularly from the archaeobotanical point of view (seeds/fruits, pieces of wood and charcoal, pollen and charcoal particles), has made it possible to reconstruct the landscape’s evolution and human-plantanimal relationships. This paper aims to present a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the relationship between archaeology and archaeobotany in order to improve the content and exposition of the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale, thanks to the fruitful cooperation between the Laboratory of Palynology and Archaeobotany of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/2 ● 175–186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi: Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education 176 development and the economic improvement of the territory. Consequently, for an efficient archaeological or historical site recovery it is essential to plan a well-defined project that shall take into account its own specific features. First of all, in a revaluation project, symbolic or cultural characteristics of the site should be assessed. Archaeological or scientific features have also to be considered, according to their important contribution in terms of knowledge and awareness. Finally, careful consideration should be given to the teaching possibilities, as these represent the strongest link between the archaeological remains and the visitors (Panosa 2012). AOAMs play a unique role in this field. Developed first in Germany and Scandinavia, while yet being relatively recent in Italy, they offer an exciting interface between scientific research and education, bridging the gap between academia and the public. By reconstructing the environments and activities of the past in a striking and evocative way, they manage to convey to a wider audience the results of excavation and research. For many of the AOAMs, a key factor has doubtless been their relationship with experimental archaeology, this developing scientific discipline having found fertile ground for testing its procedure and methods according to scientific analysis in this kind of museum, increasing the relationship between research and divulgation (Zanasi 2014a; Zanasi 2015). In addition, there is a growing demand by the public and by schools for a form of archaeology-tourism that is increasingly taking the form of edutainment. Here the learning-by-doing philosophy evinces the visitors’ emotional involvement: they are transported backwards in time, where they are immersed in the atmosphere of bygone ages. Not infrequently, this process is facilitated by the presence of qualified staff dressed in period costume and skilled in historical re-enactment (Zanasi 2014a; Zanasi 2015). Through a hands-on experiential approach, archaeological parks are one of the best tools for humanities and science education in the cultural and environmental heritage field. According to Dyer (2007), “There are curricula across all sectors which now contain more elements of cultural heritage, ecology and sustainability – particularly in science, geography, citizenship and religious education – but somehow the holistic energy that turns facts into feelings, professional development into corporate responsibility and understanding into personal action is not there in sufficient strength. (...) Bringing concrete understanding to abstract scientific concepts through memorable experiences in an inspiring environment is a very powerful educative tool which too few programmes achieve”. 2. The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale The Archaeological Park and Open-Air Museum of the Terramara of Montale, located 11 km from the city centre of Modena (Figure 1a), was set up in 2004 by the Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena. The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale is dedicated to the enhancement of the terramare communities and their characteristic villages in the Po plain area (2nd millennium BC, Northern Italy) that represent one of the most important and meaningful cultural entities of European prehistory (Bernabò Brea et al. 1997). The realization of the Park was the achievement of a long period of scientific research, which had already begun earlier and is still ongoing. At the base of the enduring success of the Park there is this peculiar, constant and osmotic relationship Figure 1. a) Location of the Terramara Park of Montale. b) Plan of the site and the openair museum of the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/2 ● 175–186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi: Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education 177 between research and divulgation, through which the visitors get involved and become aware about scientific issues that are otherwise only for specialists. The scientific basis for the Park’s realization was supplied by 19th century archaeological excavation at Montale and, above all, by the data obtained from the excavations carried out between 1996 and 2001 that led to the discovery of the stratigraphic sequence and structural aspects. The ancient dwellings, which are only partly preserved, occupy the Park’s southern sector where the excavation area has been protected with a structure that is today a museum space with plaster casts of the terramara stratigraphy and layers. Next to the archaeological area, in the Park’s northern sector, the open-air museum has been set-up. Here a full-scale sector of the terramara village has been reconstructed based on the supply of data from the excavations (Cardarelli et al. 2015a) (Figure 1b). The rich archaeological record has provided much information about the daily life of people living in the site area (Cardarelli 2009). By the beginning of the 20th century, natural sciences were becoming increasingly important in the comprehension of archaeological sites (Wilkinson, Stevens 2008). In fact, for several sites the study of botanical remains was crucial to obtaining information about human life in the past (Day 2013), as was the case of the Montale terramara (Accorsi et al. 2009; Mercuri et al. 2006a; 2006b; 2012). The amount and quality of archaeobotanical analyses carried out in this site allowed useful information to be obtained for the achievement of different proposals for the activities involving kids and adults. These activities are intended to explain and help understand the human-plantanimal relationships in the terramare communities (Bosi et al. 2013a; Bosi et al. 2013b) . This is real added value, especially considering that there are no written records from protohistory: information is available only through the different types of materials recovered from archaeological excavations and their analysis. A fruitful cooperation between the Laboratory of Palynology and Archaeobotany of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena has commenced since the planning phase of the Park, and still continues. Hopefully, this successful cooperation can serve as an example for other national and international archaeological open-air museums and parks. 3. A visit to the Park The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale offers to visitors the opportunity to experience the reconstruction of a section of the terramara, the Bronze Age villages surrounded by trenches and embankments that largely occupied the central Po Valley between the 17th and mid-12th centuries BC. Built entirely of wood, clay and plant fibres, these ancient settlements left such faint traces that only the trained eye of an archaeologist could detect and interpret them. The reconstruction in Montale is based on a solid scientific premise: the existence at the same site of a partially conserved terramara, where excavations conducted by the Archaeological Museum of Modena have uncovered the remains of the village’s fortification and dwellings, as well as plentiful artefacts. The open-air museum’s reconstructions now sit alongside the site of the original settlement, offering to the visitors a unique experience in which some level of comprehension of the excavation is facilitated by the evidence of the reconstructions. Some educational programmes are especially conceived for school groups, where the evocative side of the reconstruction is combined with the scientific aspects of the archaeological excavations. In fact, the visit retraces the steps of the archaeologists’ work: young students are engaged in tracing back the history of the ancient settlement starting from the archaeological records, thus becoming aware of the methods implied in the archaeological fieldwork, from excavation to analysis and interpretation. The visit starts in the area originally occupied by the Bronze Age settlement (Pulini, Zanasi 2009) (Figure 1b): 1. The excavation area is contained within a covered shelter. The vertical section of the dig is displayed on the back wall, where layers corresponding to the various phases of village life between 1600 and 1250 B.C. are highlighted. The traces of two large dwellings, dating back to the most ancient phases of the settlement, can be observed on the surface. Explanatory panels illustrate the excavation and the types of materials recovered and provide information about the environment and the productive activities of the terramare. After the presentation of the excavation’s site, schoolchildren are engaged in an","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"29 1","pages":"175-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24916/iansa.2017.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale is an open-air museum dedicated to the enhancement of the Bronze Age terramare culture of Northern Italy. Investigation of its rich archaeological record, particularly from the archaeobotanical point of view (seeds/fruits, pieces of wood and charcoal, pollen and charcoal particles), has made it possible to reconstruct the landscape’s evolution and human-plantanimal relationships. This paper aims to present a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the relationship between archaeology and archaeobotany in order to improve the content and exposition of the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale, thanks to the fruitful cooperation between the Laboratory of Palynology and Archaeobotany of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/2 ● 175–186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi: Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education 176 development and the economic improvement of the territory. Consequently, for an efficient archaeological or historical site recovery it is essential to plan a well-defined project that shall take into account its own specific features. First of all, in a revaluation project, symbolic or cultural characteristics of the site should be assessed. Archaeological or scientific features have also to be considered, according to their important contribution in terms of knowledge and awareness. Finally, careful consideration should be given to the teaching possibilities, as these represent the strongest link between the archaeological remains and the visitors (Panosa 2012). AOAMs play a unique role in this field. Developed first in Germany and Scandinavia, while yet being relatively recent in Italy, they offer an exciting interface between scientific research and education, bridging the gap between academia and the public. By reconstructing the environments and activities of the past in a striking and evocative way, they manage to convey to a wider audience the results of excavation and research. For many of the AOAMs, a key factor has doubtless been their relationship with experimental archaeology, this developing scientific discipline having found fertile ground for testing its procedure and methods according to scientific analysis in this kind of museum, increasing the relationship between research and divulgation (Zanasi 2014a; Zanasi 2015). In addition, there is a growing demand by the public and by schools for a form of archaeology-tourism that is increasingly taking the form of edutainment. Here the learning-by-doing philosophy evinces the visitors’ emotional involvement: they are transported backwards in time, where they are immersed in the atmosphere of bygone ages. Not infrequently, this process is facilitated by the presence of qualified staff dressed in period costume and skilled in historical re-enactment (Zanasi 2014a; Zanasi 2015). Through a hands-on experiential approach, archaeological parks are one of the best tools for humanities and science education in the cultural and environmental heritage field. According to Dyer (2007), “There are curricula across all sectors which now contain more elements of cultural heritage, ecology and sustainability – particularly in science, geography, citizenship and religious education – but somehow the holistic energy that turns facts into feelings, professional development into corporate responsibility and understanding into personal action is not there in sufficient strength. (...) Bringing concrete understanding to abstract scientific concepts through memorable experiences in an inspiring environment is a very powerful educative tool which too few programmes achieve”. 2. The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale The Archaeological Park and Open-Air Museum of the Terramara of Montale, located 11 km from the city centre of Modena (Figure 1a), was set up in 2004 by the Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena. The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale is dedicated to the enhancement of the terramare communities and their characteristic villages in the Po plain area (2nd millennium BC, Northern Italy) that represent one of the most important and meaningful cultural entities of European prehistory (Bernabò Brea et al. 1997). The realization of the Park was the achievement of a long period of scientific research, which had already begun earlier and is still ongoing. At the base of the enduring success of the Park there is this peculiar, constant and osmotic relationship Figure 1. a) Location of the Terramara Park of Montale. b) Plan of the site and the openair museum of the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/2 ● 175–186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi: Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education 177 between research and divulgation, through which the visitors get involved and become aware about scientific issues that are otherwise only for specialists. The scientific basis for the Park’s realization was supplied by 19th century archaeological excavation at Montale and, above all, by the data obtained from the excavations carried out between 1996 and 2001 that led to the discovery of the stratigraphic sequence and structural aspects. The ancient dwellings, which are only partly preserved, occupy the Park’s southern sector where the excavation area has been protected with a structure that is today a museum space with plaster casts of the terramara stratigraphy and layers. Next to the archaeological area, in the Park’s northern sector, the open-air museum has been set-up. Here a full-scale sector of the terramara village has been reconstructed based on the supply of data from the excavations (Cardarelli et al. 2015a) (Figure 1b). The rich archaeological record has provided much information about the daily life of people living in the site area (Cardarelli 2009). By the beginning of the 20th century, natural sciences were becoming increasingly important in the comprehension of archaeological sites (Wilkinson, Stevens 2008). In fact, for several sites the study of botanical remains was crucial to obtaining information about human life in the past (Day 2013), as was the case of the Montale terramara (Accorsi et al. 2009; Mercuri et al. 2006a; 2006b; 2012). The amount and quality of archaeobotanical analyses carried out in this site allowed useful information to be obtained for the achievement of different proposals for the activities involving kids and adults. These activities are intended to explain and help understand the human-plantanimal relationships in the terramare communities (Bosi et al. 2013a; Bosi et al. 2013b) . This is real added value, especially considering that there are no written records from protohistory: information is available only through the different types of materials recovered from archaeological excavations and their analysis. A fruitful cooperation between the Laboratory of Palynology and Archaeobotany of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena has commenced since the planning phase of the Park, and still continues. Hopefully, this successful cooperation can serve as an example for other national and international archaeological open-air museums and parks. 3. A visit to the Park The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale offers to visitors the opportunity to experience the reconstruction of a section of the terramara, the Bronze Age villages surrounded by trenches and embankments that largely occupied the central Po Valley between the 17th and mid-12th centuries BC. Built entirely of wood, clay and plant fibres, these ancient settlements left such faint traces that only the trained eye of an archaeologist could detect and interpret them. The reconstruction in Montale is based on a solid scientific premise: the existence at the same site of a partially conserved terramara, where excavations conducted by the Archaeological Museum of Modena have uncovered the remains of the village’s fortification and dwellings, as well as plentiful artefacts. The open-air museum’s reconstructions now sit alongside the site of the original settlement, offering to the visitors a unique experience in which some level of comprehension of the excavation is facilitated by the evidence of the reconstructions. Some educational programmes are especially conceived for school groups, where the evocative side of the reconstruction is combined with the scientific aspects of the archaeological excavations. In fact, the visit retraces the steps of the archaeologists’ work: young students are engaged in tracing back the history of the ancient settlement starting from the archaeological records, thus becoming aware of the methods implied in the archaeological fieldwork, from excavation to analysis and interpretation. The visit starts in the area originally occupied by the Bronze Age settlement (Pulini, Zanasi 2009) (Figure 1b): 1. The excavation area is contained within a covered shelter. The vertical section of the dig is displayed on the back wall, where layers corresponding to the various phases of village life between 1600 and 1250 B.C. are highlighted. The traces of two large dwellings, dating back to the most ancient phases of the settlement, can be observed on the surface. Explanatory panels illustrate the excavation and the types of materials recovered and provide information about the environment and the productive activities of the terramare. After the presentation of the excavation’s site, schoolchildren are engaged in an
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒙塔莱(意大利北部艾米利亚-罗马涅)的考古植物学和Terramara考古公园:公共教育的经验
蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园是一个露天博物馆,致力于提高意大利北部青铜器时代的Terramara文化。对其丰富的考古记录的调查,特别是从考古植物学的角度(种子/果实,木材和木炭碎片,花粉和木炭颗粒),使重建景观的演变和人-植物-动物关系成为可能。本文旨在对考古学和考古植物学之间的关系进行全面而详尽的概述,以改善蒙塔莱特拉马拉考古公园的内容和展示,这要感谢摩德纳大学孢粉学和考古植物学实验室与雷吉欧·艾米利亚和摩德纳考古和民族学公民博物馆之间富有成效的合作。175-186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi:考古植物学和蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园(意大利北部艾米利亚-罗马涅):公共教育的经验176发展和领土的经济改善。因此,为了有效地恢复考古或历史遗址,必须规划一个明确的项目,并考虑到其自身的特点。首先,在重估项目中,应评估遗址的象征或文化特征。根据其在知识和意识方面的重要贡献,还必须考虑考古或科学特征。最后,应该仔细考虑教学的可能性,因为这些代表了考古遗迹和游客之间最强有力的联系(Panosa 2012)。aoam在这一领域发挥着独特的作用。它们首先在德国和斯堪的纳维亚发展起来,而在意大利相对较近,它们为科学研究和教育提供了一个令人兴奋的界面,弥合了学术界和公众之间的差距。通过以一种引人注目和令人回味的方式重建过去的环境和活动,他们设法向更广泛的观众传达挖掘和研究的结果。对于许多aoam来说,一个关键因素无疑是他们与实验考古学的关系,这一发展中的科学学科已经找到了肥沃的土壤,可以根据这种博物馆的科学分析来测试其程序和方法,增加了研究和泄露之间的关系(Zanasi 2014a;Zanasi 2015)。此外,公众和学校对以寓教于乐为形式的考古旅游的需求日益增长。在这里,边做边学的理念证明了游客的情感参与:他们被时光倒流,沉浸在过去时代的氛围中。通常情况下,这一过程是由穿着时代服装并精通历史重演的合格工作人员在场促进的(Zanasi 2014a;Zanasi 2015)。通过亲身体验的方式,考古公园是文化和环境遗产领域人文和科学教育的最佳工具之一。根据戴尔(2007)的说法,“现在所有部门的课程都包含了更多的文化遗产、生态和可持续性元素——特别是在科学、地理、公民和宗教教育中——但不知怎的,将事实转化为情感、将专业发展转化为企业责任、将理解转化为个人行动的整体能量并没有足够的力量。”(…)在鼓舞人心的环境中,通过令人难忘的经历将具体的理解带入抽象的科学概念是一种非常强大的教育工具,而很少有方案能够做到这一点”。2. 蒙塔莱特拉马拉考古公园和露天博物馆位于摩德纳市中心11公里处(图1a),由摩德纳考古和民族学市民博物馆于2004年建立。蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园致力于加强波河平原地区(公元前2千年,意大利北部)的Terramara社区及其特色村庄,这些村庄代表了欧洲史前最重要和最有意义的文化实体之一(Bernabò Brea et al. 1997)。该公园的实现是长期科学研究的成果,这一研究已经开始,并且仍在进行中。在公园持久成功的基础上,有一种特殊的、持续的、渗透的关系(图1)。a) Montale的Terramara公园的位置。b)蒙塔莱特拉马拉考古公园遗址和露天博物馆平面图。 175-186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi:考古植物学和蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园(意大利北部艾米利亚-罗马涅):公共教育的经验177之间的研究和泄露,通过它,游客参与并意识到只有专家才能了解的科学问题。19世纪在蒙塔莱进行的考古发掘为公园的建立提供了科学依据,最重要的是,1996年至2001年间进行的发掘获得了数据,这些数据导致了地层序列和结构方面的发现。古代民居仅部分保存下来,占据了公园的南部地区,那里的挖掘区域被保护起来,今天是一个博物馆空间,里面有地层学和层的石膏模型。在考古区旁边,在公园的北部,露天博物馆已经建成。在这里,根据挖掘数据(Cardarelli et al. 2015a)(图1b)重建了terramara村的全尺寸区域。丰富的考古记录为居住在遗址地区的人们的日常生活提供了很多信息(Cardarelli 2009)。到20世纪初,自然科学在理解考古遗址方面变得越来越重要(Wilkinson, Stevens 2008)。事实上,对于一些地点来说,植物遗迹的研究对于获取过去人类生活的信息至关重要(Day 2013),就像Montale terramara的情况一样(Accorsi et al. 2009;Mercuri等人,2006;2006 b;2012)。在这个地点进行的考古植物分析的数量和质量为实现涉及儿童和成人的不同活动的建议提供了有用的信息。这些活动旨在解释和帮助理解陆地群落中的人-植物-动物关系(Bosi et al. 2013;Bosi et al. 2013)。这是真正的附加价值,特别是考虑到没有原始历史的书面记录:信息只能通过考古发掘和分析中发现的不同类型的材料获得。摩德纳大学孢粉学和考古植物学实验室与雷吉欧·艾米利亚和摩德纳考古和民族学市民博物馆之间卓有成效的合作自公园规划阶段开始,并仍在继续。希望这次成功的合作能够成为其他国家和国际考古露天博物馆和公园的典范。3.蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园为游客提供了体验Terramara部分重建的机会,青铜器时代的村庄被壕沟和堤防包围,这些村庄在公元前17世纪到12世纪中期主要占据了波河中央山谷。这些古老的定居点完全由木头、粘土和植物纤维建造而成,留下了如此微弱的痕迹,只有训练有素的考古学家才能发现和解释它们。蒙塔莱的重建是基于一个坚实的科学前提:在同一地点存在一个部分保存的terra ara,在摩德纳考古博物馆进行的挖掘中发现了村庄的防御工事和住宅的遗迹,以及大量的人工制品。露天博物馆的重建现在坐落在原始定居点的遗址旁边,为游客提供了一种独特的体验,在这种体验中,重建的证据促进了对挖掘的某种程度的理解。一些教育方案是专门为学校团体设计的,其中重建的唤起性方面与考古发掘的科学方面相结合。事实上,这次参观回溯了考古学家工作的步骤:年轻的学生们从考古记录开始追溯古代定居点的历史,从而意识到考古实地工作中隐含的方法,从挖掘到分析和解释。参观从青铜时代的定居点开始(Pulini, Zanasi 2009)(图1b): 1。挖掘区域包含在一个有盖的掩体中。挖掘的垂直部分展示在后墙上,突出显示了公元前1600年至1250年间村庄生活的各个阶段。两个大型住宅的痕迹,可以追溯到最古老的定居阶段,可以在表面上观察到。 解释性面板说明了挖掘和回收的材料类型,并提供了有关环境和terramare生产活动的信息。在介绍了发掘地点后,学生们正在进行一项活动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica
Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Chronology of Monte d’Accoddi (Sardinia, Italy) – New Radiocarbon Dates Archaeobotanical Evidence of Funerary Plant Offerings at the Southern Etrurian Necropolis of “Valle Santa nell’Agro Veientano” (Rome, Italy) Analysis of Pigments from Decorated Antler or Bone Artifacts from the Early Iron Age Princely Burial Mounds in Jalžabet (NW Croatia) Wealth or Just Job Seekers: Medieval Skeletal Series from Kutná Hora-Sedlec (Czech Republic) with a Notable Surplus of Men Application of Phytolith (Microbiomorphic) and Non-Pollen Palynomorph Analyses to the Geoarchaeological Study of the Graft Farmyard, the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1