D. Kikidis, Aikaterini Vardonikolaki, Z. Zachou, Andriana Razou, Pavlos Pantos, A. Bibas
{"title":"ABR findings in musicians with normal audiogram and otoacoustic emissions: evidence of cochlear synaptopathy?","authors":"D. Kikidis, Aikaterini Vardonikolaki, Z. Zachou, Andriana Razou, Pavlos Pantos, A. Bibas","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2019.1663054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: Although findings in human studies trying to identify signs of cochlear synaptopathy (CS) are still controversial, several methodological restrictions exist, including inconsistencies in participants profiles, definition of study groups and inclusion criteria, diverse electrophysiological measurements settings and noise exposure history metrics and participants’ age range, which question the reliability of conclusions. Method: Two groups of individuals aged 18–41 participated in this study. The first group consisted of 24 musicians with well documented occupational noise exposure and the second one of 24 healthy controls. Groups were matched for age and gender. Inclusion criteria were normal and symmetrical pure tone audiometry and extended high frequency audiometry thresholds, as well as present and normal TEOAEs and DPOAEs. Outcome measures included SNR scores of speech in bubble audiometry and auditory brainstem response waves I, II and V amplitudes and latencies at three different presentation rates: 11, 33 and 44 clicks/s. Results: Wave I amplitude in musicians was significantly lower compared to controls at all presentation rates (11/s: p .043, 33/s: p .007 and 44/s: p .014). There was also a significantly greater reduction in wave I amplitude as well as in wave Ι/V amplitude ratio in the 33/s stimulus presentation in musicians compared to the control group (p .02 and .01, respectively). Finally, lower wave I amplitudes were found in musicians with auditory symptoms compared to musicians without symptoms at the 44/s presentation rate (p = .002). Conclusion: The ABR findings in our study are suggestive of possible increased prevalence of CS in musicians. Wave I amplitude was lower in Musicians group compared to matched controls. Furthermore, there was a greater reduction of wave I amplitude and wave Ι/V amplitude ratio at higher stimulation rates, which would support their use in CS studies.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":"59 1","pages":"36 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2019.1663054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Abstract Purpose: Although findings in human studies trying to identify signs of cochlear synaptopathy (CS) are still controversial, several methodological restrictions exist, including inconsistencies in participants profiles, definition of study groups and inclusion criteria, diverse electrophysiological measurements settings and noise exposure history metrics and participants’ age range, which question the reliability of conclusions. Method: Two groups of individuals aged 18–41 participated in this study. The first group consisted of 24 musicians with well documented occupational noise exposure and the second one of 24 healthy controls. Groups were matched for age and gender. Inclusion criteria were normal and symmetrical pure tone audiometry and extended high frequency audiometry thresholds, as well as present and normal TEOAEs and DPOAEs. Outcome measures included SNR scores of speech in bubble audiometry and auditory brainstem response waves I, II and V amplitudes and latencies at three different presentation rates: 11, 33 and 44 clicks/s. Results: Wave I amplitude in musicians was significantly lower compared to controls at all presentation rates (11/s: p .043, 33/s: p .007 and 44/s: p .014). There was also a significantly greater reduction in wave I amplitude as well as in wave Ι/V amplitude ratio in the 33/s stimulus presentation in musicians compared to the control group (p .02 and .01, respectively). Finally, lower wave I amplitudes were found in musicians with auditory symptoms compared to musicians without symptoms at the 44/s presentation rate (p = .002). Conclusion: The ABR findings in our study are suggestive of possible increased prevalence of CS in musicians. Wave I amplitude was lower in Musicians group compared to matched controls. Furthermore, there was a greater reduction of wave I amplitude and wave Ι/V amplitude ratio at higher stimulation rates, which would support their use in CS studies.
摘要:目的:尽管在人类研究中试图识别耳蜗突触病(CS)迹象的发现仍然存在争议,但存在一些方法学上的限制,包括参与者概况的不一致,研究组和纳入标准的定义,不同的电生理测量设置和噪声暴露史指标以及参与者的年龄范围,这些都质疑结论的可靠性。方法:分为两组,年龄18-41岁。第一组由24名职业噪音暴露记录良好的音乐家组成,第二组由24名健康对照者组成。各组按年龄和性别进行匹配。纳入标准为正常和对称的纯音测听和扩展的高频测听阈值,以及存在和正常的teoae和dpoae。结果测量包括气泡测听的语音信噪比评分和三种不同呈现率(11、33和44次点击/秒)下脑干听觉反应波I、II和V的振幅和潜伏期。结果:与对照组相比,在所有呈现率下,音乐家的波I振幅显著降低(11/s: p .043, 33/s: p .007和44/s: p .014)。与对照组相比,在33/s的刺激呈现中,音乐家的I波振幅和Ι/V波振幅比的下降幅度也明显更大(p分别为0.02和0.01)。最后,与没有症状的音乐家相比,有听觉症状的音乐家在44/s的呈现率下发现了较低的波I振幅(p = 0.002)。结论:本研究的ABR结果提示音乐家中CS的患病率可能增加。与对照组相比,音乐家组的第一波振幅较低。此外,在较高的刺激速率下,波I振幅和波Ι/V振幅比的降低幅度更大,这将支持它们在CS研究中的应用。