Do Return Migration Policies Matter? A typology of young Romanian returnees’ attitudes towards return policies

Monica Șerban, Alina Croitoru
{"title":"Do Return Migration Policies Matter? A typology of young Romanian returnees’ attitudes towards return policies","authors":"Monica Șerban, Alina Croitoru","doi":"10.2478/scr-2018-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the last decades, the interest in migration policies has increased, both at institutional level and in academia. However, if the scientific understanding of policies associated with migration at destination has tremendously advanced, our knowledge about origin countries interventions in migration stays limited. Our paper addresses one of the largely unexplored topic of this area: if and what kind of policies supporting return/returnees the returnees themselves find appropriate. The analysis is based on 120 interviews with Romanian returnees, aged 18 to 39, coming back after at least 6 months of working or studying abroad in different EU countries. The article reveals that even if the return policies are generally positively evaluated by the Romanian returned migrants, not all of them support the idea of having policies specially designed for attracting migrants back to the origin country. Some of them simply reject the idea and others are sceptical about the state capacity of implementing this type of policies. The paper explores all the main clusters of attitudes towards return migration policies and illustrates each of them with excerpts from in-depth interviews.","PeriodicalId":83295,"journal":{"name":"The Urban & social change review","volume":"5 1","pages":"34 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Urban & social change review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/scr-2018-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract During the last decades, the interest in migration policies has increased, both at institutional level and in academia. However, if the scientific understanding of policies associated with migration at destination has tremendously advanced, our knowledge about origin countries interventions in migration stays limited. Our paper addresses one of the largely unexplored topic of this area: if and what kind of policies supporting return/returnees the returnees themselves find appropriate. The analysis is based on 120 interviews with Romanian returnees, aged 18 to 39, coming back after at least 6 months of working or studying abroad in different EU countries. The article reveals that even if the return policies are generally positively evaluated by the Romanian returned migrants, not all of them support the idea of having policies specially designed for attracting migrants back to the origin country. Some of them simply reject the idea and others are sceptical about the state capacity of implementing this type of policies. The paper explores all the main clusters of attitudes towards return migration policies and illustrates each of them with excerpts from in-depth interviews.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
返乡移民政策重要吗?罗马尼亚青年回返者对回返政策态度的类型学
在过去的几十年里,无论是在制度层面还是在学术界,对移民政策的兴趣都有所增加。然而,如果对目的地移民相关政策的科学理解取得了巨大进步,我们对原籍国移民干预措施的了解仍然有限。我们的论文论述了这一领域一个基本上未被探讨的主题:回返者自己认为支持回返者/回返者的政策是否合适,以及什么样的政策合适。该分析基于对120名罗马尼亚海归的采访,他们的年龄在18岁至39岁之间,在不同的欧盟国家工作或学习至少6个月后回国。文章显示,即使罗马尼亚回返移民普遍对回返政策给予积极评价,但并非所有人都支持制定专门吸引移民返回原籍国的政策。他们中的一些人干脆拒绝这个想法,另一些人则对国家执行这类政策的能力持怀疑态度。本文探讨了对回归移民政策的所有主要态度集群,并通过深度访谈的摘录说明了每一种态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Representations of Communism among Romanian Teenagers: A Research Note The Role of Confucius Institute in Shaping China’s National Image in Botswana: Case of CI Students Predictors of Adolescent Motherhood in Romania Social work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Administrative and personal response to new challenges A critical analysis of anarchist critiques of the Field of “Solidarity and Cooperative Economy” in Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1