On the Energy Consumption and Ranging Accuracy of Ultra-Wideband Physical Interfaces

Laura Flueratoru, S. Wehrli, M. Magno, D. Niculescu
{"title":"On the Energy Consumption and Ranging Accuracy of Ultra-Wideband Physical Interfaces","authors":"Laura Flueratoru, S. Wehrli, M. Magno, D. Niculescu","doi":"10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9347984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultra-wideband (UWB) communication is attracting increased interest for its high-accuracy distance measurements. However, the typical current consumption of tens to hundreds of mA during transmission and reception might make the technology prohibitive to battery-powered devices in the Internet of Things. The IEEE 802.15.4 standard specifies two UWB physical layer interfaces (PHYs), with low- and high-rate pulse repetition (LRP and HRP, respectively). While the LRP PHY allows a more energy-efficient implementation of the UWB transceiver than its HRP counterpart, the question is whether some ranging quality is lost in exchange. We evaluate the trade-off between power and energy consumption, on the one hand, and distance measurement accuracy and precision, on the other hand, using UWB devices developed by Decawave (HRP) and 3db Access (LRP). We find that the distance measurement errors of 3db Access devices have at most 12 cm higher bias and standard deviation in line-of-sight propagation and 2–3 times higher spread in non-line-of-sight scenarios than those of Decawave devices. However, 3db Access chips consume 10 times less power and 125 times less energy per distance measurement than Decawave ones. Since the LRP PHY has an ultra-low energy consumption, it should be preferred over the HRP PHY when energy efficiency is critical, with a small penalty in the ranging performance.","PeriodicalId":12759,"journal":{"name":"GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9347984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Ultra-wideband (UWB) communication is attracting increased interest for its high-accuracy distance measurements. However, the typical current consumption of tens to hundreds of mA during transmission and reception might make the technology prohibitive to battery-powered devices in the Internet of Things. The IEEE 802.15.4 standard specifies two UWB physical layer interfaces (PHYs), with low- and high-rate pulse repetition (LRP and HRP, respectively). While the LRP PHY allows a more energy-efficient implementation of the UWB transceiver than its HRP counterpart, the question is whether some ranging quality is lost in exchange. We evaluate the trade-off between power and energy consumption, on the one hand, and distance measurement accuracy and precision, on the other hand, using UWB devices developed by Decawave (HRP) and 3db Access (LRP). We find that the distance measurement errors of 3db Access devices have at most 12 cm higher bias and standard deviation in line-of-sight propagation and 2–3 times higher spread in non-line-of-sight scenarios than those of Decawave devices. However, 3db Access chips consume 10 times less power and 125 times less energy per distance measurement than Decawave ones. Since the LRP PHY has an ultra-low energy consumption, it should be preferred over the HRP PHY when energy efficiency is critical, with a small penalty in the ranging performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超宽带物理接口的能耗与测距精度研究
超宽带(UWB)通信因其高精度的距离测量而受到越来越多的关注。然而,在传输和接收过程中,典型的几十到几百毫安的电流消耗可能会使该技术无法用于物联网中的电池供电设备。IEEE 802.15.4标准规定了两个UWB物理层接口,分别为LRP (low- rate pulse repetition)和HRP (high-rate pulse repetition)。虽然LRP PHY可以实现比HRP更节能的UWB收发器,但问题是是否会损失一些范围质量。我们利用Decawave (HRP)和3db Access (LRP)开发的超宽带设备,评估了功率和能耗与距离测量准确度和精度之间的权衡。我们发现,3db Access器件的距离测量误差在视距传播情况下比Decawave器件的偏差和标准差最多高12 cm,在非视距情况下比Decawave器件的传播误差高2-3倍。但是,3db Access芯片的功率比Decawave芯片低10倍,每次距离测量的能量比Decawave芯片低125倍。由于LRP PHY具有超低的能耗,因此在能源效率至关重要的情况下,它应该比HRP PHY更受欢迎,并且对测距性能的影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AirID: Injecting a Custom RF Fingerprint for Enhanced UAV Identification using Deep Learning Oversampling Algorithm based on Reinforcement Learning in Imbalanced Problems FAST-RAM: A Fast AI-assistant Solution for Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in MEC Achieving Privacy-Preserving Vehicle Selection for Effective Content Dissemination in Smart Cities Age-optimal Transmission Policy for Markov Source with Differential Encoding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1