Liposomal Amphotericin B Induced Acute Reactions

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Acta Medica Mediterranea Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI:10.32552/2021.actamedica.566
M. Bahap, Pinar Bakir Ekinci, Ş. Alp, S. G. Oz, K. Demirkan
{"title":"Liposomal Amphotericin B Induced Acute Reactions","authors":"M. Bahap, Pinar Bakir Ekinci, Ş. Alp, S. G. Oz, K. Demirkan","doi":"10.32552/2021.actamedica.566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three formulations of amphotericin B are available: liposomal, lipid complex and conventional. The liposomal amphotericin B is more preferred agent than other formulations because of its tolerability, safety and potent antifungal activity. However, the liposomal amphotericin B can cause infusion-related reactions. In this case report, we aimed to report a patient who developed infusion-related reactions during the treatment with the liposomal amphotericin B but eventually tolerated the prolonged infusion. In this case report, we present a patient who developed an infusion-related reaction during The liposomal amphotericin B treatment. A 26-year-old male patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia was hospitalized for the third course of chemotherapy. Due to the invasive fungal infection history in previous hospitalizations, the liposomal amphotericin B 400 mg (IV, 5 mg/kg) once daily was initiated as secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Swelling in infusion site and chest pain were reported within 10 minutes of the liposomal amphotericin B administration, and the infusion rate was slowed down to 400 mg/6 hours from 400 mg/2 hours. All these reactions disappeared with prolonged infusion time. The patient received a total of 7 liposomal amphotericin B doses subsequently without any reaction during the chemotherapy cycle. In our experience, the liposomal amphotericin B-induced infusion-related reactions can be resolved by prolonging the infusion time.","PeriodicalId":50891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Mediterranea","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Mediterranea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32552/2021.actamedica.566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three formulations of amphotericin B are available: liposomal, lipid complex and conventional. The liposomal amphotericin B is more preferred agent than other formulations because of its tolerability, safety and potent antifungal activity. However, the liposomal amphotericin B can cause infusion-related reactions. In this case report, we aimed to report a patient who developed infusion-related reactions during the treatment with the liposomal amphotericin B but eventually tolerated the prolonged infusion. In this case report, we present a patient who developed an infusion-related reaction during The liposomal amphotericin B treatment. A 26-year-old male patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia was hospitalized for the third course of chemotherapy. Due to the invasive fungal infection history in previous hospitalizations, the liposomal amphotericin B 400 mg (IV, 5 mg/kg) once daily was initiated as secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Swelling in infusion site and chest pain were reported within 10 minutes of the liposomal amphotericin B administration, and the infusion rate was slowed down to 400 mg/6 hours from 400 mg/2 hours. All these reactions disappeared with prolonged infusion time. The patient received a total of 7 liposomal amphotericin B doses subsequently without any reaction during the chemotherapy cycle. In our experience, the liposomal amphotericin B-induced infusion-related reactions can be resolved by prolonging the infusion time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两性霉素B脂质体诱导急性反应
两性霉素B有三种剂型:脂质体、脂质复合物和常规剂型。脂质体两性霉素B由于其耐受性、安全性和抗真菌活性较好,是较理想的制剂。然而,两性霉素B脂质体可引起输注相关反应。在本病例报告中,我们的目的是报告一名患者在使用两性霉素B脂质体治疗期间出现输注相关反应,但最终耐受了长时间的输注。在本病例报告中,我们报告了一位在两性霉素B脂质体治疗期间发生输注相关反应的患者。一位26岁的男性急性早幼粒细胞白血病患者住院接受第三疗程的化疗。由于既往住院有侵袭性真菌感染史,因此开始每日一次两性霉素脂质体400mg(静脉注射,5mg /kg)作为二级抗真菌预防。两性霉素B脂质体给药后10分钟内出现输注部位肿胀和胸痛,输注速度由400mg /2小时降至400mg /6小时。随着注射时间的延长,这些反应逐渐消失。随后,患者共接受7次两性霉素B脂质体治疗,在化疗周期内无任何反应。根据我们的经验,两性霉素b脂质体诱导的输注相关反应可以通过延长输注时间来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Mediterranea
Acta Medica Mediterranea 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Mediterranea is an indipendent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal, online and open-access, designed for internists and phisicians. The journal publishes a variety of manuscript types, including review articles, original research, case reports and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Older patients’ driving safety with the help of DRIVING SIMULATOR: Which cognitive test can predict better driving safety? Evaluation of the results of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis Low-grade glial tumors: The experience of an oncology hospital in Türkiye High 30-day readmission rates in hospitalized patients with heart failure: Strengthening the need for a multidisciplinary and integrated approach Malignancy and Sarcoidosis: A Single Center Experience from Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1