Conceptual and Theoretical Debates on Social Movement Studies

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Romanian Journal of Political Science Pub Date : 2021-08-22 DOI:10.3126/jps.v21i1.39280
Mahendra Sapkota
{"title":"Conceptual and Theoretical Debates on Social Movement Studies","authors":"Mahendra Sapkota","doi":"10.3126/jps.v21i1.39280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a review based synthesis on the conceptual and theoretical debates on social movements (SMs). It aims to analyse the debate from different theoretical lens which are popularly used in the studies of SMs. The paper then explores prominent research issues that could be grounded at the local contexts of the movements.  The main argument of the paper is that the discourse of SM is not linear and monolithic. Rather, it is a poly centric notion and thus essentially contested in terms of theorization and research.","PeriodicalId":41810,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Political Science","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jps.v21i1.39280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is a review based synthesis on the conceptual and theoretical debates on social movements (SMs). It aims to analyse the debate from different theoretical lens which are popularly used in the studies of SMs. The paper then explores prominent research issues that could be grounded at the local contexts of the movements.  The main argument of the paper is that the discourse of SM is not linear and monolithic. Rather, it is a poly centric notion and thus essentially contested in terms of theorization and research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会运动研究的概念与理论之争
本文是基于对社会运动的概念和理论争论的综合回顾。本文旨在从SMs研究中常用的不同理论视角分析争论。然后,论文探讨了突出的研究问题,这些问题可以在运动的当地背景下扎根。本文的主要论点是SM的话语不是线性的和单一的。相反,它是一个多中心的概念,因此在理论和研究方面本质上是有争议的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Paradigm Shift in Social Science Research: A General Perspective Measuring Governance in Nepal Information Warfare and Digitalization of Politics in a Globalized World Revenue and Expenditure Base of Municipalities at Gandaki Province Buddhist Perspective on Politics [Public Lecture]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1