History of research involving mentally disabled persons - from exploitation through exclusion to appropriate inclusion

T. Dakić
{"title":"History of research involving mentally disabled persons - from exploitation through exclusion to appropriate inclusion","authors":"T. Dakić","doi":"10.2298/MPNS1810337D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The inability to protect their own interests makes mentally disabled subjects particularly vulnerable; they face an increased likelihood of being wronged or harmed in the context of research. Therefore, they are due to having extra protection and safeguarding. History of research misconduct and abuse of mentally ill patients. The 20th century abounds with examples of ethically inadmissible experiments conducted on decisionally impaired patients. The most infamous among them are surely the atrocities of the Nazi doctors, whose fraudulent ex­periments resulted in death of hundreds of thousands of imprisoned innocent and mentally ill individuals. Current and previous regulations and recommendations on research involving the mentally ill. Extreme use of potentially vulnerable mentally ill persons in research has led to a set of policies and practices for protection from exploitation and abuse of human research participants. While the regulations initially protected these vulnerable patients by prohibiting research including the mentally disabled, current guidelines propose appropriate safe­guarding so that they may be involved in appropriate research. Conclusion. Protection measures for the mentally disabled persons who are unable to consent to their involvement in research, by banning all biomedical research including the mentally ill are restrictive and unnecessary. Even if well-intended, such overprotection is discriminatory and implies that new treatments for conditions that directly affect the incapacitated subjects will not be developed. Providing that they are properly protected from unnecessary harms, appropriate inclusion of vulnerable mentally ill patients in research is necessary in order to meet their health needs in a safe manner.","PeriodicalId":18511,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski pregled","volume":"29 1","pages":"335-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski pregled","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS1810337D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The inability to protect their own interests makes mentally disabled subjects particularly vulnerable; they face an increased likelihood of being wronged or harmed in the context of research. Therefore, they are due to having extra protection and safeguarding. History of research misconduct and abuse of mentally ill patients. The 20th century abounds with examples of ethically inadmissible experiments conducted on decisionally impaired patients. The most infamous among them are surely the atrocities of the Nazi doctors, whose fraudulent ex­periments resulted in death of hundreds of thousands of imprisoned innocent and mentally ill individuals. Current and previous regulations and recommendations on research involving the mentally ill. Extreme use of potentially vulnerable mentally ill persons in research has led to a set of policies and practices for protection from exploitation and abuse of human research participants. While the regulations initially protected these vulnerable patients by prohibiting research including the mentally disabled, current guidelines propose appropriate safe­guarding so that they may be involved in appropriate research. Conclusion. Protection measures for the mentally disabled persons who are unable to consent to their involvement in research, by banning all biomedical research including the mentally ill are restrictive and unnecessary. Even if well-intended, such overprotection is discriminatory and implies that new treatments for conditions that directly affect the incapacitated subjects will not be developed. Providing that they are properly protected from unnecessary harms, appropriate inclusion of vulnerable mentally ill patients in research is necessary in order to meet their health needs in a safe manner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
涉及智障人士的研究历史——从剥削到排斥再到适当包容
介绍。无法保护自身利益使智障受试者特别容易受到伤害;他们在研究中受到冤枉或伤害的可能性越来越大。因此,他们是由于有额外的保护和保障。研究不当和虐待精神病患者的历史。在20世纪,对决策障碍患者进行道德上不可接受的实验的例子比比皆是。其中最臭名昭著的无疑是纳粹医生的暴行,他们的欺诈性实验导致数十万被监禁的无辜者和精神病患者死亡。关于精神疾病研究的现行和以前的法规和建议。在研究中极端利用可能易受伤害的精神病患者,导致了一套保护人类研究参与者免遭剥削和虐待的政策和做法。虽然法规最初通过禁止包括智障在内的研究来保护这些易受伤害的患者,但目前的指导方针提出了适当的安全保护措施,以便他们可以参与适当的研究。结论。通过禁止包括精神病患者在内的所有生物医学研究,对无法同意参与研究的精神残疾者采取的保护措施是限制性的和不必要的。即使是出于好意,这种过度保护也是歧视性的,并意味着对直接影响无行为能力受试者的病症的新治疗方法将无法开发出来。只要他们得到适当保护,免受不必要的伤害,就有必要将易受伤害的精神病患者适当纳入研究,以便以安全的方式满足他们的健康需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Giant breast hamartoma in a middle-aged woman: A case report Effects of mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative pulmonary complications Evaluation of knowledge on induced pluripotent stem cells among the general population and medical professionals Acute effects of oral sodium bicarbonate on blood marker levels in elite judo athletes Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1