Sport values, personal values and antisocial behavior in sport

Christopher Ring , Jean Whitehead , Bahri Gürpınar , Maria Kavussanu
{"title":"Sport values, personal values and antisocial behavior in sport","authors":"Christopher Ring ,&nbsp;Jean Whitehead ,&nbsp;Bahri Gürpınar ,&nbsp;Maria Kavussanu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajsep.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A core aspect of morality concerns behavior towards others. To better understand this issue, we investigated the values-behavior relationship. In a cross-sectional study design, 165 team sport athletes rated the importance of Lee's sport values and Schwartz's basic personal values and reported their frequency of antisocial behavior in sport. With sport values, antisocial behavior was negatively correlated with moral values but positively correlated with status values. With personal values, antisocial behavior was negatively correlated with self-transcendence and conservation values but positively correlated with self-enhancement values. In terms of the relative importance of values, competence and moral were more important than status sport values, whereas self-transcendence and openness to change were more important than conservation and self-enhancement personal values. In terms of the conceptual link across contexts, comparisons of sport and personal values confirmed strong overlap between status and self-enhancement values, competence and openness to change values, and moral and self-transcendence values. In conclusion, antisocial behavior was related to both sport and personal values, and, in line with theory and evidence, the relationship between values and antisocial behavior resembled an <em>unethicality</em> profile.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100129,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 177-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667239123000187/pdfft?md5=ae67daafd9a122296dc2de47b34463ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2667239123000187-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667239123000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A core aspect of morality concerns behavior towards others. To better understand this issue, we investigated the values-behavior relationship. In a cross-sectional study design, 165 team sport athletes rated the importance of Lee's sport values and Schwartz's basic personal values and reported their frequency of antisocial behavior in sport. With sport values, antisocial behavior was negatively correlated with moral values but positively correlated with status values. With personal values, antisocial behavior was negatively correlated with self-transcendence and conservation values but positively correlated with self-enhancement values. In terms of the relative importance of values, competence and moral were more important than status sport values, whereas self-transcendence and openness to change were more important than conservation and self-enhancement personal values. In terms of the conceptual link across contexts, comparisons of sport and personal values confirmed strong overlap between status and self-enhancement values, competence and openness to change values, and moral and self-transcendence values. In conclusion, antisocial behavior was related to both sport and personal values, and, in line with theory and evidence, the relationship between values and antisocial behavior resembled an unethicality profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育价值观、个人价值观和体育运动中的反社会行为
道德的一个核心方面涉及对他人的行为。为了更好地理解这一问题,我们研究了价值观与行为之间的关系。在一项横断面研究设计中,165 名团队运动运动员对李氏运动价值观和施瓦茨个人基本价值观的重要性进行了评分,并报告了他们在运动中的反社会行为频率。在体育价值观方面,反社会行为与道德价值观呈负相关,但与地位价值观呈正相关。在个人价值观方面,反社会行为与自我超越和保护价值观负相关,但与自我提升价值观正相关。就价值观的相对重要性而言,能力和道德价值观比地位运动价值观更重要,而自我超越和开放求变的价值观比自我保护和自我提升的个人价值观更重要。就不同情境下的概念联系而言,体育价值观和个人价值观的比较证实,地位和自我提升价值观、能力和开放变革价值观以及道德和自我超越价值观之间存在很大的重叠。总之,反社会行为既与体育价值观有关,也与个人价值观有关,而且与理论和证据相一致的是,价值观与反社会行为之间的关系类似于不道德行为特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring coach onboarding strategy and university athlete performance: A scale development study Reflections and insights on a mindfulness, acceptance, and commitment-based (MAC) intervention with complementary Self-Determination Theory (SDT) principles delivered by a coach The size of the crowd and home advantage in football: Evidence from Chinese Super League Centralizing an ecological sport psychology through science-practice dialectics An examination of the relationship between burnout and grit in college athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1