Participation in Mental Health Advocacy: Results of a National Survey

CuddyAndrew
{"title":"Participation in Mental Health Advocacy: Results of a National Survey","authors":"CuddyAndrew","doi":"10.7870/CJCMH-2015-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the participation of people with lived experience of mental health problems in political, social, and client advocacy. An online survey was conducted of 27 advocacy organizations across Canada. People with lived experience exhibited the highest level of participation in program delivery, with rates of participation varying by advocacy activity and sub-group. Stigma around mental health and severity of illness were rated as the strongest barriers limiting participation. The support of service providers and peer role models were considered effective strategies for increasing participation. Several self-benefits were reported as highly prevalent among mental health advocates.","PeriodicalId":79815,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of community mental health = Revue canadienne de sante mentale communautaire","volume":"44 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of community mental health = Revue canadienne de sante mentale communautaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7870/CJCMH-2015-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examined the participation of people with lived experience of mental health problems in political, social, and client advocacy. An online survey was conducted of 27 advocacy organizations across Canada. People with lived experience exhibited the highest level of participation in program delivery, with rates of participation varying by advocacy activity and sub-group. Stigma around mental health and severity of illness were rated as the strongest barriers limiting participation. The support of service providers and peer role models were considered effective strategies for increasing participation. Several self-benefits were reported as highly prevalent among mental health advocates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与精神卫生宣传:一项全国调查的结果
本研究调查了有精神健康问题生活经验的人在政治、社会和客户宣传中的参与情况。一项在线调查对加拿大27个倡导组织进行了调查。有生活经验的人在项目实施中表现出最高的参与度,参与率因宣传活动和分组而异。围绕心理健康和疾病严重程度的耻辱感被认为是限制参与的最大障碍。服务提供者和同伴榜样的支持被认为是增加参与的有效战略。据报道,一些自我利益在精神健康倡导者中非常普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Resilience Program for Post-Secondary Students: A Pilot Study Use of Teletherapy for the Treatment of People with Psychotic Disorders During Covid-19 Confinement: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Challenges Mental Health Complexity Among Children and Youth: Current Conceptualizations and Future Directions Implementation of Action-Based Cognitive Remediation in First Episode Psychosis: A Multi-Method Evaluation of Feasibility and Efficacy Resident Perspectives on Modular Housing: The Need for Progression, Collaboration, and Autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1