On selecting a probabilistic classifier for appointment no-show prediction

Shannon L. Harris, Michele Samorani
{"title":"On selecting a probabilistic classifier for appointment no-show prediction","authors":"Shannon L. Harris, Michele Samorani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3631887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Appointment no-shows are disruptive to healthcare clinics, and may increase patient waiting time and clinic overtime, resulting in increased clinic costs. Appointment scheduling models typically mitigate the negative effects of no-shows through appointment overbooking. Recent work has proposed a predictive overbooking framework, where a probabilisitic classifier predicts the no-show probability of individual appointment requests, and a scheduling algorithm uses those predictions to optimally schedule appointments. Because predicting no-shows is typically an imbalanced classification problem, the preferred classifier is often chosen based upon the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), which is a commonly used metric for many other imbalanced classification problems. Contrary to intuition, in this paper we show that employing the AUC to select a classifier results in significantly lower schedule efficiency than using other metrics such as Log Loss or Brier Score. Our computational experiments, validated on large real-world appointment data, suggest that by using Log Loss or Brier Score instead of AUC, practitioners can improve the schedule quality by 3–7%.","PeriodicalId":11156,"journal":{"name":"Decis. Support Syst.","volume":"96 1","pages":"113472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decis. Support Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Appointment no-shows are disruptive to healthcare clinics, and may increase patient waiting time and clinic overtime, resulting in increased clinic costs. Appointment scheduling models typically mitigate the negative effects of no-shows through appointment overbooking. Recent work has proposed a predictive overbooking framework, where a probabilisitic classifier predicts the no-show probability of individual appointment requests, and a scheduling algorithm uses those predictions to optimally schedule appointments. Because predicting no-shows is typically an imbalanced classification problem, the preferred classifier is often chosen based upon the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), which is a commonly used metric for many other imbalanced classification problems. Contrary to intuition, in this paper we show that employing the AUC to select a classifier results in significantly lower schedule efficiency than using other metrics such as Log Loss or Brier Score. Our computational experiments, validated on large real-world appointment data, suggest that by using Log Loss or Brier Score instead of AUC, practitioners can improve the schedule quality by 3–7%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预约失约预测的概率分类器选择
预约失约对医疗保健诊所来说是破坏性的,可能会增加患者的等待时间和诊所加班时间,导致诊所成本增加。预约调度模型通常通过预约超额预订来减轻未赴约的负面影响。最近的工作提出了一个预测超额预订框架,其中概率分类器预测单个约会请求未出现的概率,调度算法使用这些预测来优化调度约会。因为预测不出现是一个典型的不平衡分类问题,所以首选分类器通常是根据接收者操作员特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来选择的,这是许多其他不平衡分类问题的常用度量。与直觉相反,在本文中,我们表明使用AUC来选择分类器的调度效率明显低于使用其他指标(如Log Loss或Brier Score)。我们的计算实验,在大量真实世界的预约数据上验证,表明通过使用Log Loss或Brier Score代替AUC,从业者可以将计划质量提高3-7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Portraying probabilistic relationships of continuous nodes in Bayesian networks with ranked nodes method Power structure builds gamer loyalty Analysis of third-party request structures to detect fraudulent websites An interface between natural language and abstract argumentation frameworks for real-time debate analysis The dynamic customer engagement behaviors in the customer satisfaction survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1