DIFFERENTIAL STAINING PATTERNS FOR EVALUATION OF OVARIAN AND OVIDUCTS FIBROSIS USING THE POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPE AND THE DIGITAL IMAGES ANALYSIS

R. Ahmed
{"title":"DIFFERENTIAL STAINING PATTERNS FOR EVALUATION OF OVARIAN AND OVIDUCTS FIBROSIS USING THE POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPE AND THE DIGITAL IMAGES ANALYSIS","authors":"R. Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/ejz.2022.134076.1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several histological and immunohistochemical techniques are used in the diagnosis of fibrosis. To better visualization of collagen fibers in both normal and pathological tissues, new optical approaches are required. The present study aimed to investigate/compare the efficiency of various histological stains, using the traditional light microscope and the light polarizing microscope, to quantify/evaluate the ovarian and oviduct fibrosis induced by high-fat diet (HFD) consumption. Twenty-Four female albino rats ( Rattus norvegicus albinus ) were randomly allotted into 4 groups (n=6): control groups (fed on standard diet for 6 and 12 weeks), HFD1 group (fed on HFD for 6 weeks), and HFD2 group (fed on HFD for 12 weeks). The ovarian and oviduct fibrosis were investigated via histological stains including hematoxylin and eosin, Picrosirius Red, van Gieson, and Masson’s trichrome stains using traditional light and polarizing light microscopes, in addition to immunohistochemical demonstrations of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and vimentin. Hydroxyproline and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were also investigated biochemically in the ovarian and oviduct tissues. The results showed that the HFD induced ovarian and oviducts fibrosis in time-dependent manner with significant increases in hydroxyproline and TNF-α values, as well as immunoexpression of α-SMA and vimentin. Picrosirius red stain achieved ideal results in collagen demonstration when compared with van Gieson and Masson’s trichrome stains. Picrosirius red stain in combination with the polarization microscope represented high sensitivity in collagen estimation in comparison with light microscopy. This work recommended using polarizing microscope as a tool to evaluate fibrosis of both the ovaries and the oviducts.","PeriodicalId":11659,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Zoology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejz.2022.134076.1080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several histological and immunohistochemical techniques are used in the diagnosis of fibrosis. To better visualization of collagen fibers in both normal and pathological tissues, new optical approaches are required. The present study aimed to investigate/compare the efficiency of various histological stains, using the traditional light microscope and the light polarizing microscope, to quantify/evaluate the ovarian and oviduct fibrosis induced by high-fat diet (HFD) consumption. Twenty-Four female albino rats ( Rattus norvegicus albinus ) were randomly allotted into 4 groups (n=6): control groups (fed on standard diet for 6 and 12 weeks), HFD1 group (fed on HFD for 6 weeks), and HFD2 group (fed on HFD for 12 weeks). The ovarian and oviduct fibrosis were investigated via histological stains including hematoxylin and eosin, Picrosirius Red, van Gieson, and Masson’s trichrome stains using traditional light and polarizing light microscopes, in addition to immunohistochemical demonstrations of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and vimentin. Hydroxyproline and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were also investigated biochemically in the ovarian and oviduct tissues. The results showed that the HFD induced ovarian and oviducts fibrosis in time-dependent manner with significant increases in hydroxyproline and TNF-α values, as well as immunoexpression of α-SMA and vimentin. Picrosirius red stain achieved ideal results in collagen demonstration when compared with van Gieson and Masson’s trichrome stains. Picrosirius red stain in combination with the polarization microscope represented high sensitivity in collagen estimation in comparison with light microscopy. This work recommended using polarizing microscope as a tool to evaluate fibrosis of both the ovaries and the oviducts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鉴别染色模式评估卵巢和输卵管纤维化使用偏光显微镜和数字图像分析
几种组织学和免疫组织化学技术用于纤维化的诊断。为了更好地显示正常和病理组织中的胶原纤维,需要新的光学方法。本研究旨在探讨/比较不同组织学染色方法在传统光学显微镜和光偏光显微镜下对高脂饮食(high-fat diet, HFD)引起的卵巢和输卵管纤维化的定量评价。雌性白化大鼠24只,随机分为4组(n=6):对照组(饲喂标准饲料6周、12周)、HFD1组(饲喂高脂饲料6周)、HFD2组(饲喂高脂饲料12周)。采用苏木精和伊红、Picrosirius Red、van Gieson和Masson’s三色染色,以及α-平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA)和vimentin的免疫组化检测,观察卵巢和输卵管纤维化情况。同时对卵巢和输卵管组织中羟脯氨酸和肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)进行生化检测。结果表明,HFD诱导卵巢和输卵管纤维化呈时间依赖性,羟脯氨酸和TNF-α值显著升高,α-SMA和vimentin的免疫表达显著升高。与van Gieson和Masson的三色染色相比,小天狼星红染色在胶原蛋白展示方面取得了理想的效果。与光镜相比,小天狼星红染色联合偏光显微镜对胶原蛋白的估计具有较高的灵敏度。本工作推荐使用偏光显微镜作为评估卵巢和输卵管纤维化的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESTIMATING THE ROLE OF ARTHROPOD SUCCESSION IN PREDICTING THE POSTMORTEM INTERVAL OF INDOOR DROWNED AND SLAUGHTERED RAT CADAVERS THE EFFECTS OF ASPARTAME ON SOME FETAL TISSUES OF FEMALE ALBINO RATS COMPARATIVE BIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT FOR TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE OF SOME ECO-FRIENDLY INSECTICIDES APPLIED FOR CONTROLLING OF THE FOURTH INSTAR LARVAE OF SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA HISTOLOGICAL STUDIES ON LIVERS OF RATS’ MOTHERS AND THEIR OFFSPRING FOLLOWING OXALIPLATIN TREATMENT, AND THE POSSIBLE PROTECTIVE ROLE OF PROPOLIS EFFECT OF GESTATIONAL EXPOSURE TO NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDE "THIACLOPRID" ON WISTAR RATS AND THEIR FETUSES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1