Performance Evaluation of ROS Local Trajectory Planning Algorithms to Social Navigation

Q2 Arts and Humanities Platonic Investigations Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035
F. Pimentel, P. Aquino
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of ROS Local Trajectory Planning Algorithms to Social Navigation","authors":"F. Pimentel, P. Aquino","doi":"10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.","PeriodicalId":36690,"journal":{"name":"Platonic Investigations","volume":"144 1","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Platonic Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向社会导航的ROS局部轨迹规划算法性能评价
准确性和安全性是社会导航的必要特征,但仍然是一个挑战。ROS导航堆栈(RNS)允许通过插件进行导航的本地路径规划方法的变化。本文将对这些方法进行比较,这些方法直接关系到机器人的安全性和自然性。因此,通过改变传感器和模拟环境,比较了四种不同的方法。每个组合使用每种方法的标准参数进行1000次实验,共24000次实验。本文得出的结论是,Elastic Band (EBand)方法比参与RoboCup@home的多个机器人常用的动态窗口方法(Dynamic window approach, DWA)更具安全性和准确性,因此更适合社交导航——在某些情况下达到90%的准确率,碰撞率低于5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Platonic Investigations
Platonic Investigations Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Lycopene Encapsulation Efficiency in Polycapprolactone Vs Poly Lactic Co-glycolic Acid A 2D Stick Model for Simulation of Sow walking Economic Analysis of Battery (NMC) Cathode Material Production in Flame Spray Process with Sustainable Solvents Slow Fashion: Ethics and Sustainability in the Fashion Batik Industry Decisions to Stay or Leave an Abusive Relationship: A Case Study Research of Dating Violence in Salatiga, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1