Assessment of complex variable basis functions in the approximation of ideal fluid flow problems

B. Wilkins, T. Hromadka, A. Johnson, Randy Boucher, H. D. McInvale, S. Horton
{"title":"Assessment of complex variable basis functions in the approximation of ideal fluid flow problems","authors":"B. Wilkins, T. Hromadka, A. Johnson, Randy Boucher, H. D. McInvale, S. Horton","doi":"10.2495/CMEM-V7-N1-45-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solving potential problems, such as those that occur in the analysis of steady-state heat transfer, electrostatics, ideal fluid flow, and groundwater flow, is important in several fields of engineering, science, and applied mathematics. Numerical solution of the relevant governing equations typically involves using techniques such as domain methods (including finite element, finite difference, or finite volume), or boundary element methods (using either real or complex variables). In this paper, the Complex Variable Boundary Element method (“CVBEM”) is examined with respect to the use of different types of basis functions in the CVBEM approximation function. Four basis function families are assessed in their solution success in modeling an important benchmark problem in ideal fluid flow; namely, flow around a 90 degree bend. Identical problem domains are used in the examination, and identical degrees of freedom are used in the CVBEM approximation functions. Further, a new computational modeling error is defined and used to compare the results herein; specifically, M = E / N where M is the proposed computational error measure, E is the maximum difference (in absolute value) between approximation and boundary condition value, and N is the number of degrees of freedom used in the approximation.","PeriodicalId":36958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","volume":"9 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V7-N1-45-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Solving potential problems, such as those that occur in the analysis of steady-state heat transfer, electrostatics, ideal fluid flow, and groundwater flow, is important in several fields of engineering, science, and applied mathematics. Numerical solution of the relevant governing equations typically involves using techniques such as domain methods (including finite element, finite difference, or finite volume), or boundary element methods (using either real or complex variables). In this paper, the Complex Variable Boundary Element method (“CVBEM”) is examined with respect to the use of different types of basis functions in the CVBEM approximation function. Four basis function families are assessed in their solution success in modeling an important benchmark problem in ideal fluid flow; namely, flow around a 90 degree bend. Identical problem domains are used in the examination, and identical degrees of freedom are used in the CVBEM approximation functions. Further, a new computational modeling error is defined and used to compare the results herein; specifically, M = E / N where M is the proposed computational error measure, E is the maximum difference (in absolute value) between approximation and boundary condition value, and N is the number of degrees of freedom used in the approximation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理想流体流动问题近似中复变基函数的评定
解决潜在的问题,例如在分析稳态传热、静电学、理想流体流动和地下水流动时出现的问题,在工程、科学和应用数学的几个领域都是重要的。相关控制方程的数值解通常涉及使用诸如域方法(包括有限元、有限差分或有限体积)或边界元方法(使用实变量或复变量)等技术。本文研究了复杂变量边界元法(CVBEM)在CVBEM近似函数中不同类型基函数的使用。评价了四个基函数族对理想流体流动中一个重要基准问题的求解成功程度;也就是说,绕90度弯道流动。在检验中使用了相同的问题域,并且在CVBEM近似函数中使用了相同的自由度。此外,定义了一个新的计算建模误差,并将其用于比较本文的结果;其中M = E / N,其中M为提出的计算误差度量,E为近似值与边界条件值之间的最大差值(绝对值),N为近似值所使用的自由度数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊最新文献
IndianFoodNet: Detecting Indian Food Items Using Deep Learning CFD Simulation of Premixed Flame in Counter Burner under the Influence of a Magnetic Field Chest Freezer Performance with Non-Condensable Gases Stress Distribution in Cantilever Beams with Different Hole Shapes: A Numerical Analysis Combined Impact of Joule Heating, Activation Energy, and Viscous Dissipation on Ternary Nanofluid Flow over Three Different Geometries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1