{"title":"sP-selectin is a useful biomarker for cardiovascular risk: findings from an elderly primary healthcare population","authors":"U. Alehagen, T. Lindahl","doi":"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives sP-selectin is a marker for atherosclerosis and inflammation. It provides prognostic information on cardiovascular events, as reported in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate sP-selectin as a biomarker for cardiovascular mortality in an elderly primary healthcare population, with a focus on possible sex differences. Methods The study included 437 elderly healthy participants from an epidemiological project living in a rural municipality. Clinical examination, echocardiography, and biomarker measurements were performed. All participants were followed for 5.2 years and all mortality was registered. Results sP-selectin was shown to provide significant prognostic information also when including NT-proBNP in a multivariate setting over 5 years with a hazard ratio of 3.12 (95% confidence interval 1.57–6.18) for cardiovascular mortality and a hazard ratio of 2.46 (95% confidence interval 1.39–4.34) for all-cause mortality. The addition of D-dimer to the model did not weaken the results. The sex-specific analyses showed that sP-selectin could be used in both sexes with equally good results; however, there are signs indicating possibly a worse prognosis for women with high-serum levels of sP-selectin. Conclusion sP-selectin is a prognostic biomarker for mortality in an elderly primary healthcare population. Compared with NT-proBNP, sP-selectin is at least as effective. We therefore suggest sP-selectin as an additional biomarker to be used in assessing the elderly to identify those at risk of cardiovascular events. The results presented should be considered hypothesis-generating, and warrant more research.","PeriodicalId":72529,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular endocrinology","volume":"36 1","pages":"22–27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Objectives sP-selectin is a marker for atherosclerosis and inflammation. It provides prognostic information on cardiovascular events, as reported in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate sP-selectin as a biomarker for cardiovascular mortality in an elderly primary healthcare population, with a focus on possible sex differences. Methods The study included 437 elderly healthy participants from an epidemiological project living in a rural municipality. Clinical examination, echocardiography, and biomarker measurements were performed. All participants were followed for 5.2 years and all mortality was registered. Results sP-selectin was shown to provide significant prognostic information also when including NT-proBNP in a multivariate setting over 5 years with a hazard ratio of 3.12 (95% confidence interval 1.57–6.18) for cardiovascular mortality and a hazard ratio of 2.46 (95% confidence interval 1.39–4.34) for all-cause mortality. The addition of D-dimer to the model did not weaken the results. The sex-specific analyses showed that sP-selectin could be used in both sexes with equally good results; however, there are signs indicating possibly a worse prognosis for women with high-serum levels of sP-selectin. Conclusion sP-selectin is a prognostic biomarker for mortality in an elderly primary healthcare population. Compared with NT-proBNP, sP-selectin is at least as effective. We therefore suggest sP-selectin as an additional biomarker to be used in assessing the elderly to identify those at risk of cardiovascular events. The results presented should be considered hypothesis-generating, and warrant more research.