A. Nettles, Baxter W. Barnes, W. Guin, James P Mavo
{"title":"The effects of off-axis loading on the compression after impact strength of quasi-isotropic face sheet honeycomb core sandwich structure","authors":"A. Nettles, Baxter W. Barnes, W. Guin, James P Mavo","doi":"10.1177/10996362231180147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) testing of aluminum honeycomb core sandwich structure with face sheets made of co-cured T1100/3960 quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy when tested at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ with respect to the 0⁰ fibers. In a previous study examining the CAI strengths of honeycomb sandwich structure, it was found that specimens had different CAI strengths, based on a [−45/90/+45/0]S layup, depending on whether they were tested in the 0⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [−45/90/+45/0]S) or 90⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [+45/0/-45/90]S). The CAI strength results showed that the specimens tested in the 90⁰ direction had a 19% drop in CAI strength compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ direction. This was attributed to the 0⁰ load bearing plies in the 0⁰ direction specimens being “tucked in” at the center of the specimen thus providing more stability against microbuckling. This raised the question as to what CAI strength would specimens tested at +22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−22.5/−67.5/+67.6/+22.5]S) and −22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−67.5/+67.5/+22.5/-22.5]S) have compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ and 90⁰ direction. Results presented in this study show that the specimens loaded at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ have a similar average CAI strength compared to the specimens loaded in the 0⁰ direction. The specimens loaded in the 90⁰ direction exhibit 16% lower average CAI strength. Additional specimens were tested in the +45⁰ direction to put the 0⁰ load bearing fibers on the outside of the specimen to see if this would decrease the strength as has been documented for undamaged strength. These specimens have average CAI strength values between the 0⁰ direction average CAI strength values and the 90⁰ direction average CAI strength values.","PeriodicalId":17215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials","volume":"9 1","pages":"793 - 802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362231180147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) testing of aluminum honeycomb core sandwich structure with face sheets made of co-cured T1100/3960 quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy when tested at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ with respect to the 0⁰ fibers. In a previous study examining the CAI strengths of honeycomb sandwich structure, it was found that specimens had different CAI strengths, based on a [−45/90/+45/0]S layup, depending on whether they were tested in the 0⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [−45/90/+45/0]S) or 90⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [+45/0/-45/90]S). The CAI strength results showed that the specimens tested in the 90⁰ direction had a 19% drop in CAI strength compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ direction. This was attributed to the 0⁰ load bearing plies in the 0⁰ direction specimens being “tucked in” at the center of the specimen thus providing more stability against microbuckling. This raised the question as to what CAI strength would specimens tested at +22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−22.5/−67.5/+67.6/+22.5]S) and −22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−67.5/+67.5/+22.5/-22.5]S) have compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ and 90⁰ direction. Results presented in this study show that the specimens loaded at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ have a similar average CAI strength compared to the specimens loaded in the 0⁰ direction. The specimens loaded in the 90⁰ direction exhibit 16% lower average CAI strength. Additional specimens were tested in the +45⁰ direction to put the 0⁰ load bearing fibers on the outside of the specimen to see if this would decrease the strength as has been documented for undamaged strength. These specimens have average CAI strength values between the 0⁰ direction average CAI strength values and the 90⁰ direction average CAI strength values.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials is an international peer reviewed journal that provides a means of communication to fellow engineers and scientists by providing an archival record of developments in the science, technology, and professional practices of sandwich construction throughout the world. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).