The effects of off-axis loading on the compression after impact strength of quasi-isotropic face sheet honeycomb core sandwich structure

IF 3.5 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1177/10996362231180147
A. Nettles, Baxter W. Barnes, W. Guin, James P Mavo
{"title":"The effects of off-axis loading on the compression after impact strength of quasi-isotropic face sheet honeycomb core sandwich structure","authors":"A. Nettles, Baxter W. Barnes, W. Guin, James P Mavo","doi":"10.1177/10996362231180147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) testing of aluminum honeycomb core sandwich structure with face sheets made of co-cured T1100/3960 quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy when tested at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ with respect to the 0⁰ fibers. In a previous study examining the CAI strengths of honeycomb sandwich structure, it was found that specimens had different CAI strengths, based on a [−45/90/+45/0]S layup, depending on whether they were tested in the 0⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [−45/90/+45/0]S) or 90⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [+45/0/-45/90]S). The CAI strength results showed that the specimens tested in the 90⁰ direction had a 19% drop in CAI strength compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ direction. This was attributed to the 0⁰ load bearing plies in the 0⁰ direction specimens being “tucked in” at the center of the specimen thus providing more stability against microbuckling. This raised the question as to what CAI strength would specimens tested at +22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−22.5/−67.5/+67.6/+22.5]S) and −22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−67.5/+67.5/+22.5/-22.5]S) have compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ and 90⁰ direction. Results presented in this study show that the specimens loaded at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ have a similar average CAI strength compared to the specimens loaded in the 0⁰ direction. The specimens loaded in the 90⁰ direction exhibit 16% lower average CAI strength. Additional specimens were tested in the +45⁰ direction to put the 0⁰ load bearing fibers on the outside of the specimen to see if this would decrease the strength as has been documented for undamaged strength. These specimens have average CAI strength values between the 0⁰ direction average CAI strength values and the 90⁰ direction average CAI strength values.","PeriodicalId":17215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials","volume":"9 1","pages":"793 - 802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362231180147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) testing of aluminum honeycomb core sandwich structure with face sheets made of co-cured T1100/3960 quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy when tested at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ with respect to the 0⁰ fibers. In a previous study examining the CAI strengths of honeycomb sandwich structure, it was found that specimens had different CAI strengths, based on a [−45/90/+45/0]S layup, depending on whether they were tested in the 0⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [−45/90/+45/0]S) or 90⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [+45/0/-45/90]S). The CAI strength results showed that the specimens tested in the 90⁰ direction had a 19% drop in CAI strength compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ direction. This was attributed to the 0⁰ load bearing plies in the 0⁰ direction specimens being “tucked in” at the center of the specimen thus providing more stability against microbuckling. This raised the question as to what CAI strength would specimens tested at +22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−22.5/−67.5/+67.6/+22.5]S) and −22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [−67.5/+67.5/+22.5/-22.5]S) have compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ and 90⁰ direction. Results presented in this study show that the specimens loaded at +22.5⁰ and −22.5⁰ have a similar average CAI strength compared to the specimens loaded in the 0⁰ direction. The specimens loaded in the 90⁰ direction exhibit 16% lower average CAI strength. Additional specimens were tested in the +45⁰ direction to put the 0⁰ load bearing fibers on the outside of the specimen to see if this would decrease the strength as has been documented for undamaged strength. These specimens have average CAI strength values between the 0⁰ direction average CAI strength values and the 90⁰ direction average CAI strength values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离轴载荷对准各向同性面板蜂窝芯夹层结构冲击后压缩强度的影响
本研究展示了与0⁰纤维相比,在+22.5⁰和- 22.5⁰测试时,用共固化T1100/3960准各向同性碳/环氧树脂制成的铝蜂窝芯夹层结构的冲击后压缩(CAI)测试的实验结果。在之前的一项研究中,研究人员检查了蜂窝夹层结构的CAI强度,发现基于[-45/90 /+45/0]S铺层,试件具有不同的CAI强度,这取决于它们是在0⁰方向([-45/90 /+45/0]S的面板铺层)还是在90⁰方向([+45/0/-45/90]S的面板铺层)进行测试。人工智能强度结果显示,与在0⁰方向测试的标本相比,在90⁰方向测试的标本的人工智能强度下降了19%。这归因于0⁰方向试件的0⁰承载层被“塞”在试件中心,从而提供了更多的抗微屈曲稳定性。这就提出了一个问题,即与在0⁰和90⁰方向测试的样本相比,在+22.5⁰(面板铺设为[-22.5 /- 67.5/+67.6/+22.5]S)和-22.5⁰(面板铺设为[- 67.5/+67.5/+22.5/-22.5]S)测试的样本的CAI强度是多少。本研究的结果表明,与0⁰方向加载的标本相比,+22.5⁰加载的标本具有相似的平均CAI强度。在90⁰方向加载的标本显示平均CAI强度降低16%。在+45⁰方向上测试额外的样品,将0⁰承重纤维放在样品的外部,看看这是否会降低强度,因为已经记录了未损坏的强度。这些标本的平均CAI强度值介于0⁰方向平均CAI强度值和90⁰方向平均CAI强度值之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials
Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
49
审稿时长
7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials is an international peer reviewed journal that provides a means of communication to fellow engineers and scientists by providing an archival record of developments in the science, technology, and professional practices of sandwich construction throughout the world. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Fundamental mechanical relations of open-cell metal foam composite materials with reticular porous structure Bond strength empirical-mathematical equation and optimization of Al1050/AISI304 bilayer sheets fabricated by cold roll bonding method Flexural and impact response of sandwich panels with Nomex honeycomb core and hybrid fiber composite skins Global buckling response of sandwich panels with additively manufactured lattice cores Numerical study on structured sandwich panels exposed to spherical air explosions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1