The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project: a Lesson of Sustainability from the Terramare Culture, Middle Bronze Age of the Po Plain (Northern Italy)

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI:10.24916/IANSA.2018.2.8
Cremaschi Mauro, A. Mercuri, Alessandra Benatti, Giovanna Bosi, Brandolini Filippo, Eleonora Clò, A. Florenzano, Elisa Furia, G. S. Mariani, M. Mazzanti, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Eleonora Rattighieri, Rossella Rinaldi, P. Torri, Zerboni Andrea
{"title":"The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project: a Lesson of Sustainability from the Terramare Culture, Middle Bronze Age of the Po Plain (Northern Italy)","authors":"Cremaschi Mauro, A. Mercuri, Alessandra Benatti, Giovanna Bosi, Brandolini Filippo, Eleonora Clò, A. Florenzano, Elisa Furia, G. S. Mariani, M. Mazzanti, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Eleonora Rattighieri, Rossella Rinaldi, P. Torri, Zerboni Andrea","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2018.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This backstory article deals with the SUCCESSO-TERRA Project (2017–2020), an interdisciplinary research program aiming at reconstructing the land-use transformations that occurred during the development of the Terramare culture in the southern-central Po Plain of Northern Italy. Topics include climate-environment changes, human impact and exploitation of natural resources that are interconnected topics in human ecology and environmental sciences. These topics can only be understood in a long-term perspective integrating archaeology, geology, botany and other sciences. The text includes the theoretical basis, the research strategy and the main methodological approaches given by geoarchaeology and palynology, the two research sides constituting the partnership of the project. Figure 1. The logo and concept of the SUCCESSO-TERRA Project. IANSA 2018 ● IX/2 ● 221–229 Mauro Cremaschi, Anna Maria Mercuri, Alessandra Benatti, Giovanna Bosi, Filippo Brandolini, Eleonora Clò, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Furia, Guido S. Mariani, Marta Mazzanti, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Eleonora Rattighieri, Rossella Rinaldi, Paola Torri, Andrea Zerboni: The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project: a Lesson of Sustainability from the Terramare Culture, Middle Bronze Age of the Po Plain (Northern Italy) 222 MIUR (Ministry of Italy for University and Research, action 20158KBLNB, P.I.: M. Cremaschi) joins together experts on Geoarchaeology (University of Milan) and Palynology (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) to study highresolution archaeological sediments with an interdisciplinary ecological perspective. SUCCESSO-TERRA points towards the relationships between climate-environment changes, human impact, and exploitation of natural resources – topics that are traditionally interconnected in human ecology (Butzer, 1982). These topics can only be understood given a long-term perspective: integrating archaeology, geology, and biology (mostly consisting of botany and zoology). The concept that archaeological sciences can be a tool to deal with modern societal challenges is at the basis of SUCCESSO-TERRA: an “old but new approach” to compare current issues to those concerning sustainability in the 3rd millennium BP. Archaeological scientific investigations with a long-term perspective have repeatedly suggested a possible nexus between changes in climate (main trends and rapid events) and societal crises during the Holocene (Jalut et al., 2009; Mercuri et al., 2011); the main role played today by the on-going climate change in influencing human adaptation is also evident (Oldfield, 2005; Mercuri et al., 2015a). To establish if climate change influenced the cultural trajectory of the Terramare culture – and if so, then to estimate its true contribution – is the core of the project. The Terramare settlements are exemplar archaeological/ palaeoenvironmental contexts showing the complex dynamic between regional climatic/environmental changes and land use. SUCCESSO-TERRA avoids climatic determinism and maintains a bi-directional perspective in the study of the relationships between climate, environment, and people – considering as it does the environment and civilizations as part of a complex dynamic system (e.g. Stoffle et al., 2003; Mercuri, 2008; Cremaschi, Zerboni 2009; 2011; Mercuri, Sadori, 2012). From one side, climate changes have triggered environmental and cultural adaptations. From the other side, people have continuously, and deeply, shaped the landscape in which they settled. However, a continuing and increasing human exploitation of natural resources creates an imbalance in the system (Diamond, 2005), resulting in possible episodes of population relocation or the collapse of human societies. Within this framework, Bronze Age Mediterranean civilizations have offered us several examples of crises with catastrophic outcomes. Similar dramatic effects have been recorded along the Alpine fringe with the crisis of the pile-dwelling communities (Magny et al., 2011). All these episodes led to significant changes in the structure of the involved civilization that, experiencing as they were the first steps of urban culture at that time, had an unsustainable impact on the environment. Interdisciplinary research is mandatory if we want to understand the adaptive strategies of civilizations at different times and within a long-term perspective (Mercuri and Florenzano, 2019). The Terramare case study refers to the changing environment during the Middle and Recent Bronze Ages (ca. 1550–1170 years BC; Bernabò Brea et al., 1997; Mercuri et al., 2006a), at the Middle to Late Holocene transition, and at the border between continental and Mediterranean Italy. 2. The Terramare narrative based on archaeological and scientific evidence The term Terramare indicates the banked and moated villages of the Bronze Age, located in the alluvial plain of the Po River of Northern Italy, mostly in present-day Emilia Romagna (Pearce, 1998; Bernabò Brea, Cremaschi, 2009; Cremaschi, 2013). The Terramare culture flourished in the central part of the Po Plain during a period spanning the 16th to the 12th century BC. The Terramare economy was based upon farming, herding, and metallurgy (Bernabò Brea et al., 1997); moreover, Terramare settlements relied on having a well-developed management of water and wood resources. The people settled in an open environment that hosted scattered woodland and plentiful water resources. The Terramare people promoted networks of commercial exchange between northern Europe and the Mediterranean region. This civilization lasted for approximately 500 years, before suddenly collapsing around 1150 BC (Cardarelli, 2009). Extensive excavations and geophysical surveying disclosed the complexity of their settlements and the interconnections between residential areas, defensive structures, fields and the natural hydrography. Agriculture in fields was supplied with irrigated water, and an innovative and sophisticated management system of the natural hydrographic network was developed (Cremaschi, 2009). Large artificial canals were excavated to draw water from rivers to the moats surrounding villages; then, water was redistributed to the fields through a dense network of irrigation ditches (Cremaschi, Pizzi, 2007; 2011; Cremaschi, 2018). The irrigation strategy and competent agriculture triggered this skilled civilization to its apogee with a demographic increase from the Middle to the Recent Bronze Age. Mesophilous woods (oaks and hornbeams) gave a major supply of natural raw material for building, fuel, and food (Cardarelli, 2009; Cremaschi, 2010; Mercuri et al., 2006a; 2015b). Pollen diagrams show low forest cover close to sites with a significant presence of wet environments and a set of anthropogenic habitats testified by pollen indicators of crops and synanthropics (API, as described by Behre, 1981; Mercuri et al., 2013). According to the palynological record, the agricultural economy was based on forest management including coppicing, fruit collection in the wild, and crop fields. The fields included different types of cereals (Ravazzi et al., 1992; 2004; Mercuri et al., 2015b; Cremaschi et al., 2016) with evidence of intercropping with legumes (Mercuri et al., 2006a; 2006b). Moreover, most of the open landscapes around the villages were used for pastures as suggested IANSA 2018 ● IX/2 ● 221–229 Mauro Cremaschi, Anna Maria Mercuri, Alessandra Benatti, Giovanna Bosi, Filippo Brandolini, Eleonora Clò, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Furia, Guido S. Mariani, Marta Mazzanti, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Eleonora Rattighieri, Rossella Rinaldi, Paola Torri, Andrea Zerboni: The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project: a Lesson of Sustainability from the Terramare Culture, Middle Bronze Age of the Po Plain (Northern Italy) 223 mainly by Cichorieae and other pasture pollen indicators (Ravazzi et al., 2004; Mercuri et al., 2006b; 2015b; Cremaschi et al., 2016). These land-use types have also been confirmed by the recovery of well-preserved macrobotanical remains in most of the studied contexts (Rottoli, Motella, 2004; Rottoli, Castiglioni, 2009). The intensification of the food demand probably caused cereal production to be inadequate for such a high number of people. Environmental stresses became ever more evident and wood resources were renewing slowly. For instance, the last phases of the pollen diagram from the Terramara di Montale show a decrease of woodland together with a reduction in cereal fields suggesting that soil and wood overexploitation might have been among the actual causes of the Terramare’s crisis (Mercuri et al., 2006b). At the top of the sequence of Santa Rosa di Poviglio, in correspondence with the drying of the moat system, a similar dramatic decrease of woods suggests that there may have been a twofold causation in the societal crisis affecting the Terramare culture: the increased aridity (a natural factor) and the overgrazing of natural resources (an anthropogenic factor) might have played a fairly synchronous action on the landscape (Cremaschi et al., 2016). The societal collapse of the Terramare culture is dated at ca. 1150 years BC; settlements in the central Po Plain were abandoned and Final Bronze Age settlements survived only in the northern sector of the Po Plain and in the Northern Apennines. 3. Research strategy 3.1 Key archaeological sites The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project analyses data from three Bronze Age sites (Figure 2): (i) the Terramara Santa Rosa di Poviglio (Bernabò Brea, Cremaschi, 2004) (Figures 3–5) and (ii) the Vasca di Noceto site (Bernabò Brea, Cremaschi, 2009) (Figures 3, 6–8) are in the Po Plain; while (iii) the San Michele di Valestra (Cremaschi, 1997) site is a coeval settlement in the Apennines (Figures 3, 9–10). The first and second sites are well-known archaeological sites belonging to the Po Plain Terramare culture, whose excavations have been on-going for many years. The latter – San Michele di Valestra – is a Bronze Age site, located outside the Ter","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2018.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This backstory article deals with the SUCCESSO-TERRA Project (2017–2020), an interdisciplinary research program aiming at reconstructing the land-use transformations that occurred during the development of the Terramare culture in the southern-central Po Plain of Northern Italy. Topics include climate-environment changes, human impact and exploitation of natural resources that are interconnected topics in human ecology and environmental sciences. These topics can only be understood in a long-term perspective integrating archaeology, geology, botany and other sciences. The text includes the theoretical basis, the research strategy and the main methodological approaches given by geoarchaeology and palynology, the two research sides constituting the partnership of the project. Figure 1. The logo and concept of the SUCCESSO-TERRA Project. IANSA 2018 ● IX/2 ● 221–229 Mauro Cremaschi, Anna Maria Mercuri, Alessandra Benatti, Giovanna Bosi, Filippo Brandolini, Eleonora Clò, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Furia, Guido S. Mariani, Marta Mazzanti, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Eleonora Rattighieri, Rossella Rinaldi, Paola Torri, Andrea Zerboni: The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project: a Lesson of Sustainability from the Terramare Culture, Middle Bronze Age of the Po Plain (Northern Italy) 222 MIUR (Ministry of Italy for University and Research, action 20158KBLNB, P.I.: M. Cremaschi) joins together experts on Geoarchaeology (University of Milan) and Palynology (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) to study highresolution archaeological sediments with an interdisciplinary ecological perspective. SUCCESSO-TERRA points towards the relationships between climate-environment changes, human impact, and exploitation of natural resources – topics that are traditionally interconnected in human ecology (Butzer, 1982). These topics can only be understood given a long-term perspective: integrating archaeology, geology, and biology (mostly consisting of botany and zoology). The concept that archaeological sciences can be a tool to deal with modern societal challenges is at the basis of SUCCESSO-TERRA: an “old but new approach” to compare current issues to those concerning sustainability in the 3rd millennium BP. Archaeological scientific investigations with a long-term perspective have repeatedly suggested a possible nexus between changes in climate (main trends and rapid events) and societal crises during the Holocene (Jalut et al., 2009; Mercuri et al., 2011); the main role played today by the on-going climate change in influencing human adaptation is also evident (Oldfield, 2005; Mercuri et al., 2015a). To establish if climate change influenced the cultural trajectory of the Terramare culture – and if so, then to estimate its true contribution – is the core of the project. The Terramare settlements are exemplar archaeological/ palaeoenvironmental contexts showing the complex dynamic between regional climatic/environmental changes and land use. SUCCESSO-TERRA avoids climatic determinism and maintains a bi-directional perspective in the study of the relationships between climate, environment, and people – considering as it does the environment and civilizations as part of a complex dynamic system (e.g. Stoffle et al., 2003; Mercuri, 2008; Cremaschi, Zerboni 2009; 2011; Mercuri, Sadori, 2012). From one side, climate changes have triggered environmental and cultural adaptations. From the other side, people have continuously, and deeply, shaped the landscape in which they settled. However, a continuing and increasing human exploitation of natural resources creates an imbalance in the system (Diamond, 2005), resulting in possible episodes of population relocation or the collapse of human societies. Within this framework, Bronze Age Mediterranean civilizations have offered us several examples of crises with catastrophic outcomes. Similar dramatic effects have been recorded along the Alpine fringe with the crisis of the pile-dwelling communities (Magny et al., 2011). All these episodes led to significant changes in the structure of the involved civilization that, experiencing as they were the first steps of urban culture at that time, had an unsustainable impact on the environment. Interdisciplinary research is mandatory if we want to understand the adaptive strategies of civilizations at different times and within a long-term perspective (Mercuri and Florenzano, 2019). The Terramare case study refers to the changing environment during the Middle and Recent Bronze Ages (ca. 1550–1170 years BC; Bernabò Brea et al., 1997; Mercuri et al., 2006a), at the Middle to Late Holocene transition, and at the border between continental and Mediterranean Italy. 2. The Terramare narrative based on archaeological and scientific evidence The term Terramare indicates the banked and moated villages of the Bronze Age, located in the alluvial plain of the Po River of Northern Italy, mostly in present-day Emilia Romagna (Pearce, 1998; Bernabò Brea, Cremaschi, 2009; Cremaschi, 2013). The Terramare culture flourished in the central part of the Po Plain during a period spanning the 16th to the 12th century BC. The Terramare economy was based upon farming, herding, and metallurgy (Bernabò Brea et al., 1997); moreover, Terramare settlements relied on having a well-developed management of water and wood resources. The people settled in an open environment that hosted scattered woodland and plentiful water resources. The Terramare people promoted networks of commercial exchange between northern Europe and the Mediterranean region. This civilization lasted for approximately 500 years, before suddenly collapsing around 1150 BC (Cardarelli, 2009). Extensive excavations and geophysical surveying disclosed the complexity of their settlements and the interconnections between residential areas, defensive structures, fields and the natural hydrography. Agriculture in fields was supplied with irrigated water, and an innovative and sophisticated management system of the natural hydrographic network was developed (Cremaschi, 2009). Large artificial canals were excavated to draw water from rivers to the moats surrounding villages; then, water was redistributed to the fields through a dense network of irrigation ditches (Cremaschi, Pizzi, 2007; 2011; Cremaschi, 2018). The irrigation strategy and competent agriculture triggered this skilled civilization to its apogee with a demographic increase from the Middle to the Recent Bronze Age. Mesophilous woods (oaks and hornbeams) gave a major supply of natural raw material for building, fuel, and food (Cardarelli, 2009; Cremaschi, 2010; Mercuri et al., 2006a; 2015b). Pollen diagrams show low forest cover close to sites with a significant presence of wet environments and a set of anthropogenic habitats testified by pollen indicators of crops and synanthropics (API, as described by Behre, 1981; Mercuri et al., 2013). According to the palynological record, the agricultural economy was based on forest management including coppicing, fruit collection in the wild, and crop fields. The fields included different types of cereals (Ravazzi et al., 1992; 2004; Mercuri et al., 2015b; Cremaschi et al., 2016) with evidence of intercropping with legumes (Mercuri et al., 2006a; 2006b). Moreover, most of the open landscapes around the villages were used for pastures as suggested IANSA 2018 ● IX/2 ● 221–229 Mauro Cremaschi, Anna Maria Mercuri, Alessandra Benatti, Giovanna Bosi, Filippo Brandolini, Eleonora Clò, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Furia, Guido S. Mariani, Marta Mazzanti, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Eleonora Rattighieri, Rossella Rinaldi, Paola Torri, Andrea Zerboni: The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project: a Lesson of Sustainability from the Terramare Culture, Middle Bronze Age of the Po Plain (Northern Italy) 223 mainly by Cichorieae and other pasture pollen indicators (Ravazzi et al., 2004; Mercuri et al., 2006b; 2015b; Cremaschi et al., 2016). These land-use types have also been confirmed by the recovery of well-preserved macrobotanical remains in most of the studied contexts (Rottoli, Motella, 2004; Rottoli, Castiglioni, 2009). The intensification of the food demand probably caused cereal production to be inadequate for such a high number of people. Environmental stresses became ever more evident and wood resources were renewing slowly. For instance, the last phases of the pollen diagram from the Terramara di Montale show a decrease of woodland together with a reduction in cereal fields suggesting that soil and wood overexploitation might have been among the actual causes of the Terramare’s crisis (Mercuri et al., 2006b). At the top of the sequence of Santa Rosa di Poviglio, in correspondence with the drying of the moat system, a similar dramatic decrease of woods suggests that there may have been a twofold causation in the societal crisis affecting the Terramare culture: the increased aridity (a natural factor) and the overgrazing of natural resources (an anthropogenic factor) might have played a fairly synchronous action on the landscape (Cremaschi et al., 2016). The societal collapse of the Terramare culture is dated at ca. 1150 years BC; settlements in the central Po Plain were abandoned and Final Bronze Age settlements survived only in the northern sector of the Po Plain and in the Northern Apennines. 3. Research strategy 3.1 Key archaeological sites The SUCCESSO-TERRA Project analyses data from three Bronze Age sites (Figure 2): (i) the Terramara Santa Rosa di Poviglio (Bernabò Brea, Cremaschi, 2004) (Figures 3–5) and (ii) the Vasca di Noceto site (Bernabò Brea, Cremaschi, 2009) (Figures 3, 6–8) are in the Po Plain; while (iii) the San Michele di Valestra (Cremaschi, 1997) site is a coeval settlement in the Apennines (Figures 3, 9–10). The first and second sites are well-known archaeological sites belonging to the Po Plain Terramare culture, whose excavations have been on-going for many years. The latter – San Michele di Valestra – is a Bronze Age site, located outside the Ter
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利北部波河平原青铜器时代中期Terramare文化的可持续发展经验
Terramare一词指的是青铜器时代的河岸和护城河村庄,位于意大利北部波河的冲冲性平原,主要位于今天的艾米利亚罗马涅(Pearce, 1998;Bernabò布雷亚,克雷马斯基,2009;Cremaschi, 2013)。Terramare文化在公元前16世纪到公元前12世纪期间在波河平原的中部地区蓬勃发展。Terramare的经济以农业、畜牧业和冶金为基础(Bernabò Brea etal ., 1997);此外,Terramare定居点依赖于对水和木材资源的良好管理。人们定居在一个开放的环境中,那里有分散的林地和丰富的水资源。Terramare人促进了北欧和地中海地区之间的商业交流网络。这个文明持续了大约500年,直到大约公元前1150年突然崩溃(Cardarelli, 2009)。大量的挖掘和地球物理测量揭示了他们的定居点的复杂性,以及居民区、防御结构、田野和自然水文之间的相互联系。为农田农业提供灌溉用水,并开发了一套创新而复杂的自然水文网络管理系统(Cremaschi, 2009)。人们挖掘了大型人工运河,将河水引到村庄周围的护城河;然后,通过密集的灌溉沟渠网络将水重新分配到农田(Cremaschi, Pizzi, 2007;2011;Cremaschi, 2018)。从青铜器时代中期到最近,灌溉策略和有能力的农业使这个熟练的文明达到了人口增长的顶峰。中生性树木(橡树和角梁)为建筑、燃料和食物提供了主要的天然原料(Cardarelli, 2009;Cremaschi, 2010;Mercuri et al., 2006;2015 b)。花粉图显示,靠近潮湿环境显著存在的地点和一组人为生境的森林覆盖率较低,由作物和共生植物的花粉指标证明(API, Behre, 1981);Mercuri et al., 2013)。根据孢粉记录,农业经济是以森林管理为基础的,包括采伐、野外水果采集和农作物田。这些田地包括不同类型的谷物(Ravazzi et al., 1992;2004;Mercuri et al., 2015;Cremaschi等人,2016),有证据表明豆科作物可以间作(Mercuri等人,2006;2006 b)。此外,根据IANSA 2018●IX/2●221-229的建议,村庄周围的大部分开放景观被用于牧场。Mauro Cremaschi, Anna Maria Mercuri, Alessandra Benatti, Giovanna Bosi, Filippo Brandolini, Eleonora Clò, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Furia, Guido S. Mariani, Marta Mazzanti, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Eleonora Rattighieri, Rossella Rinaldi, Paola Torri, Andrea Zerboni: SUCCESSO-TERRA项目:Po平原(意大利北部)青铜时代中期Terramare文化的可持续性教训223主要由Cichorieae和其他牧草花粉指标(Ravazzi et al., 2004;Mercuri et al., 2006;2015 b;Cremaschi et al., 2016)。在大多数研究背景下,这些土地利用类型也被保存完好的大型植物遗迹的恢复所证实(Rottoli, Motella, 2004;Rottoli, Castiglioni, 2009)。粮食需求的加剧可能导致谷物产量不足以满足如此多的人口。环境压力日益明显,木材资源更新缓慢。例如,来自Terramara di Montale的花粉图的最后阶段显示林地减少,谷物田减少,这表明土壤和木材的过度开发可能是Terramare危机的实际原因之一(Mercuri et al., 2006b)。在Santa Rosa di Poviglio序列的顶部,与护城河系统的干燥相对应,森林的类似急剧减少表明,在影响Terramare文化的社会危机中可能存在双重原因:干旱的增加(自然因素)和自然资源的过度放牧(人为因素)可能对景观产生了相当同步的作用(Cremaschi等人,2016)。Terramare文化的社会崩溃可以追溯到公元前1150年左右;波河平原中部的定居点被遗弃了,最后的青铜时代定居点只在波河平原北部和亚平宁北部幸存下来。研究策略3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica
Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Chronology of Monte d’Accoddi (Sardinia, Italy) – New Radiocarbon Dates Archaeobotanical Evidence of Funerary Plant Offerings at the Southern Etrurian Necropolis of “Valle Santa nell’Agro Veientano” (Rome, Italy) Analysis of Pigments from Decorated Antler or Bone Artifacts from the Early Iron Age Princely Burial Mounds in Jalžabet (NW Croatia) Wealth or Just Job Seekers: Medieval Skeletal Series from Kutná Hora-Sedlec (Czech Republic) with a Notable Surplus of Men Application of Phytolith (Microbiomorphic) and Non-Pollen Palynomorph Analyses to the Geoarchaeological Study of the Graft Farmyard, the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1