The End of the “End of History”: A New Wave of Conflict in the World between a Liberalism That Is Becoming Conservative and a Socialism That Is Seeking Renewal

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE International Critical Thought Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/21598282.2022.2121743
A. Buzgalin
{"title":"The End of the “End of History”: A New Wave of Conflict in the World between a Liberalism That Is Becoming Conservative and a Socialism That Is Seeking Renewal","authors":"A. Buzgalin","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2022.2121743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Thirty years ago, Francis Fukuyama in his article “The End of History?” formulated a thesis about the final victory of the neoliberal model of capitalism. But history does not stop. Two hundred years after the birth of Marx, The Economist wrote that the millennial generation chooses socialism, and the experts who prepared the report to the US president described socialism as the main threat. The author shows that the cause of these fears is the crisis of the existing system of economic relations and institutions of late capitalism. He systematises the evidence of this crisis and shows, that dominant political and economic elite is looking for a way out of the impasse on the paths of “neoliberal conservatism” that integrates further de-socialisation and deregulation in the economy with conservative-authoritarian trends in politics and ideology. At the end of the contribution, the author reveals a number of ways of socialisation, humanisation and ecologisation of capitalism, objectively conditioned by the progress of technologies and practices of civil society actors, which differ from the existing social democratic projects that have proved to be of little effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"313 1","pages":"556 - 574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2121743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Thirty years ago, Francis Fukuyama in his article “The End of History?” formulated a thesis about the final victory of the neoliberal model of capitalism. But history does not stop. Two hundred years after the birth of Marx, The Economist wrote that the millennial generation chooses socialism, and the experts who prepared the report to the US president described socialism as the main threat. The author shows that the cause of these fears is the crisis of the existing system of economic relations and institutions of late capitalism. He systematises the evidence of this crisis and shows, that dominant political and economic elite is looking for a way out of the impasse on the paths of “neoliberal conservatism” that integrates further de-socialisation and deregulation in the economy with conservative-authoritarian trends in politics and ideology. At the end of the contribution, the author reveals a number of ways of socialisation, humanisation and ecologisation of capitalism, objectively conditioned by the progress of technologies and practices of civil society actors, which differ from the existing social democratic projects that have proved to be of little effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“历史的终结”的终结:趋向保守的自由主义与寻求更新的社会主义之间的新一波世界冲突
30年前,弗朗西斯·福山在他的文章《历史的终结?提出了一个关于资本主义新自由主义模式最终胜利的论点。但历史不会停止。在马克思诞生200年后,《经济学人》曾写道,“千禧一代选择社会主义”,准备向美国总统提交报告的专家将社会主义描述为“主要威胁”。作者认为,造成这些担忧的原因是晚期资本主义现有经济关系体系和制度的危机。他将这场危机的证据系统化,并表明占主导地位的政治和经济精英正在寻找一条摆脱“新自由主义保守主义”道路上的僵局的途径,这种保守主义将经济中的进一步去社会化和放松管制与政治和意识形态中的保守-威权趋势结合起来。在文章的最后,作者揭示了资本主义的社会化、人性化和生态化的一些方式,这些方式客观上受到技术进步和民间社会行动者实践的制约,与现有的社会民主项目不同,这些项目已被证明收效甚微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
The Colors of Content Moderation: A Portfolio of Brazilian Resistances to Coloniality on Instagram The Origin, Current Situation and Trends of Racism in the West The Law of Uneven Development and the Transition to a New World System: On the Spatial Political Economy of Socialism From “Authentic” to Actual Marxist Educational Theory: Advancing Revolutionary Pedagogies Medicine, Dissent and the “Chloroquinization” of Truth: Brazil and Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1