Myofunctional assessment for obstructive sleep apnea and the association with patterns of upper airway collapse: a preliminary study.

Fabiane Kayamori, Fabio Augusto Winckler Rabelo, Daniella Nazario, Eric Rodrigues Thuller, Esther Mandelbaum Gonçalves Bianchini
{"title":"Myofunctional assessment for obstructive sleep apnea and the association with patterns of upper airway collapse: a preliminary study.","authors":"Fabiane Kayamori, Fabio Augusto Winckler Rabelo, Daniella Nazario, Eric Rodrigues Thuller, Esther Mandelbaum Gonçalves Bianchini","doi":"10.5935/1984-0063.20220030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To organize an assessment instrument with questionnaires and myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment for OSA patients and correlate it with the upper airway obstructive site detected during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>29 OSA patients aged 22-65 years with an indication to undergo DISE to evaluate an alternative treatment to PAP and signed the consent form. Patients over 65 years old with maxillofacial deficiency and BMI>30 were excluded. The subjects answered the Pittsburgh, Berlin (snore), and Epworth questionnaires. The myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment comprised soft palate, palatine pillars, and uvula (structure and mobility), tonsils (size), mandible (bony bases), hard palate (depth and width), tongue (posture, volume, width, and height), floor of mouth (mylohyoid), tongue suction and sustaining (mobility), \"lowering of the back of the tongue\" (stimulus), which were scored by three speech-language pathologists with expertise. DISE was scored according to VOTE classification. The statistical analysis (t-test) compared groups without and with obstruction in VOTE with questionnaires and myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following were significantly different: snoring frequency (p=0.03) with VOTE/velopharynx; intensity (p=0.02) and frequency of snoring (p=0.03) with VOTE/lateral wall of oropharynx; suction the tongue and sustain (p=0.02) with VOTE/velopharynx; hard palate depth (p=0.02) and width (p=0.05) with obstruction VOTE/epiglottis; tonsils volume (p=0.05) with VOTE/epiglottis; tongue posture (p=0.00) with obstruction VOTE/epiglottis; floor of the mouth (p=0.02) with VOTE/epiglottis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher snoring frequency and intensity was observed in patients with obstruction at the velopharynx and oropharyngeal lateral wall. Obstruction at the velopharynx was associated with poor tongue ability to suck the tongue against the hard palate. Obstruction at the epiglottis had structural and functional associations, including the oropharyngeal lateral wall, affected by the palatine tonsils size, depth and width of the hard palate, tongue position, and flaccidity of the floor of mouth. Considering that this is a preliminary study, the data should be carefully verified and not generalized.</p>","PeriodicalId":23976,"journal":{"name":"Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20220030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To organize an assessment instrument with questionnaires and myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment for OSA patients and correlate it with the upper airway obstructive site detected during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

Material and methods: 29 OSA patients aged 22-65 years with an indication to undergo DISE to evaluate an alternative treatment to PAP and signed the consent form. Patients over 65 years old with maxillofacial deficiency and BMI>30 were excluded. The subjects answered the Pittsburgh, Berlin (snore), and Epworth questionnaires. The myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment comprised soft palate, palatine pillars, and uvula (structure and mobility), tonsils (size), mandible (bony bases), hard palate (depth and width), tongue (posture, volume, width, and height), floor of mouth (mylohyoid), tongue suction and sustaining (mobility), "lowering of the back of the tongue" (stimulus), which were scored by three speech-language pathologists with expertise. DISE was scored according to VOTE classification. The statistical analysis (t-test) compared groups without and with obstruction in VOTE with questionnaires and myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment.

Results: The following were significantly different: snoring frequency (p=0.03) with VOTE/velopharynx; intensity (p=0.02) and frequency of snoring (p=0.03) with VOTE/lateral wall of oropharynx; suction the tongue and sustain (p=0.02) with VOTE/velopharynx; hard palate depth (p=0.02) and width (p=0.05) with obstruction VOTE/epiglottis; tonsils volume (p=0.05) with VOTE/epiglottis; tongue posture (p=0.00) with obstruction VOTE/epiglottis; floor of the mouth (p=0.02) with VOTE/epiglottis.

Conclusion: Higher snoring frequency and intensity was observed in patients with obstruction at the velopharynx and oropharyngeal lateral wall. Obstruction at the velopharynx was associated with poor tongue ability to suck the tongue against the hard palate. Obstruction at the epiglottis had structural and functional associations, including the oropharyngeal lateral wall, affected by the palatine tonsils size, depth and width of the hard palate, tongue position, and flaccidity of the floor of mouth. Considering that this is a preliminary study, the data should be carefully verified and not generalized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的肌功能评估以及与上气道塌陷模式的关联:初步研究。
研究目的材料与方法:29 名年龄在 22-65 岁之间的 OSA 患者,均有接受 DISE 的指征,以评估 PAP 的替代治疗方法,并签署了同意书。排除了颌面部缺陷和体重指数大于 30 的 65 岁以上患者。受试者回答了匹兹堡、柏林(打鼾)和埃普沃斯问卷。口面部/咽部肌功能评估包括软腭、腭柱和悬雍垂(结构和活动度)、扁桃体(大小)、下颌骨(骨基)、硬腭(深度和宽度)、舌头(姿势、体积、宽度和高度)、口底(舌肌)、舌头的吸吮和维持(活动度)、"舌背下降"(刺激),由三位具有专业知识的语言病理学家进行评分。DISE 根据 VOTE 分类进行评分。统计分析(t 检验)通过问卷调查和口面部/咽部肌肉功能评估,比较了 VOTE 无阻塞组和有阻塞组:结果:VOTE/咽喉阻塞组和VOTE/口咽侧壁阻塞组在以下方面存在明显差异:打鼾频率(P=0.03);打鼾强度(P=0.02)和频率(P=0.03);吸舌和持续吸舌(P=0.02);硬腭深度(p=0.02)和宽度(p=0.05)与VOTE/会厌阻塞有关;扁桃体体积(p=0.05)与VOTE/会厌有关;舌头姿势(p=0.00)与VOTE/会厌阻塞有关;口底(p=0.02)与VOTE/会厌有关:结论:腭咽和口咽侧壁阻塞的患者打鼾频率和强度较高。会厌阻塞与舌头吸吮硬腭的能力差有关。会厌阻塞与结构和功能有关,包括口咽侧壁,受腭扁桃体大小、硬腭深度和宽度、舌头位置和口底松弛度的影响。考虑到这只是一项初步研究,数据应仔细核实,不能一概而论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2485
期刊介绍: Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences aims to promote rapid communication and exchange between the World and Wuhan University, as well as other Chinese universities and academic institutions. It mainly reflects the latest advances being made in many disciplines of scientific research in Chinese universities and academic institutions. The journal also publishes papers presented at conferences in China and abroad. The multi-disciplinary nature of Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences is apparent in the wide range of articles from leading Chinese scholars. This journal also aims to introduce Chinese academic achievements to the world community, by demonstrating the significance of Chinese scientific investigations.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Forkhead Box J3 (FOXJ3) in Human Cancers Three New Classes of Subsystem Codes A Note of the Interpolating Sequence in Qp∩H∞ Learning Label Correlations for Multi-Label Online Passive Aggressive Classification Algorithm Uniform Asymptotics for Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities of Risk Models with Non-Stationary Arrivals and Strongly Subexponential Claim Sizes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1