Snippets from the north: Architects in Durban and their response to identity, common culture and resistance in the 1930s

D. Whelan
{"title":"Snippets from the north: Architects in Durban and their response to identity, common culture and resistance in the 1930s","authors":"D. Whelan","doi":"10.4995/VITRUVIO-IJATS.2019.11774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previously colonized by both Holland and Britain, South Africans have always borrowed; many taking aesthetic clues from memories of ‘home’. Applied seemingly irrelevantly, these ‘clues’ often border on the pastiche. Pre and post Union in 1910, the British-controlled colonies of Natal and the Cape absorbed imported architectural influences which not only introduced an Arts and Crafts layer to Victorian Gothic and Classical revivals, but introduced vital new ideas, namely Art Deco and Modernism.Somehow this polemic embraced another revival: a melange of Tudor and Elizabethan focusing on detail, craftsmanship and nostalgia. The ‘Tudorbethan’ Revival occurred at a vital point in the inter-war era, and it is contended that this style demonstrated a calculated resistance to the hybrid ‘Union Period’ architecture and its political role in forging a common diasporic identity and culture in the 1930s, rather than a mere application of fashion.This paper situates the Tudorbethan Revival within contemporary architectural themes in Durban, South Africa, and contextualises the socio-political production of buildings between the wars before examining the works of architects who conceived this well-crafted, nostalgic and irrelevant architecture. It concludes by comparing this complex aesthetic with the contemporary architectural thread of ‘Gwelo’ Goodman’s Cape Dutch Revival suggesting the degree to which domestic architecture is able to support political positions in contested societies.","PeriodicalId":40999,"journal":{"name":"VITRUVIO-International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VITRUVIO-International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/VITRUVIO-IJATS.2019.11774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previously colonized by both Holland and Britain, South Africans have always borrowed; many taking aesthetic clues from memories of ‘home’. Applied seemingly irrelevantly, these ‘clues’ often border on the pastiche. Pre and post Union in 1910, the British-controlled colonies of Natal and the Cape absorbed imported architectural influences which not only introduced an Arts and Crafts layer to Victorian Gothic and Classical revivals, but introduced vital new ideas, namely Art Deco and Modernism.Somehow this polemic embraced another revival: a melange of Tudor and Elizabethan focusing on detail, craftsmanship and nostalgia. The ‘Tudorbethan’ Revival occurred at a vital point in the inter-war era, and it is contended that this style demonstrated a calculated resistance to the hybrid ‘Union Period’ architecture and its political role in forging a common diasporic identity and culture in the 1930s, rather than a mere application of fashion.This paper situates the Tudorbethan Revival within contemporary architectural themes in Durban, South Africa, and contextualises the socio-political production of buildings between the wars before examining the works of architects who conceived this well-crafted, nostalgic and irrelevant architecture. It concludes by comparing this complex aesthetic with the contemporary architectural thread of ‘Gwelo’ Goodman’s Cape Dutch Revival suggesting the degree to which domestic architecture is able to support political positions in contested societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自北方的片段:20世纪30年代德班的建筑师及其对身份、共同文化和抵抗的回应
南非曾是荷兰和英国的殖民地,一直以来都在借钱;许多人从“家”的记忆中寻找美学线索。这些看似无关紧要的“线索”往往接近于模仿。1910年联合前后,英国控制的纳塔尔和开普殖民地吸收了外来的建筑影响,不仅为维多利亚哥特式和古典复兴带来了艺术和工艺层,而且引入了重要的新思想,即装饰艺术和现代主义。不知何故,这场论战迎来了另一场复兴:都铎和伊丽莎白时代的融合,注重细节、工艺和怀旧。“都铎王朝”复兴发生在两次世界大战之间的关键时刻,人们认为这种风格表现出对混合“联合时期”建筑的精心抵抗,以及它在20世纪30年代形成共同流散身份和文化的政治作用,而不仅仅是时尚的应用。本文将都铎比森复兴置于南非德班的当代建筑主题中,并将两次战争之间建筑的社会政治生产置于背景下,然后研究建筑师的作品,这些建筑师构思了这些精心制作的、怀旧的和无关紧要的建筑。最后,将这种复杂的美学与“Gwelo”Goodman的Cape Dutch Revival的当代建筑风格进行比较,表明了国内建筑在竞争激烈的社会中能够支持政治立场的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Innovative housing policy tools: impact indicators in the NRRP Urban Regeneration Programmes A participatory project for the Librino Social Housing Community. Social housing in Spain: obsolescence and intervention strategies A new construction approach for tiny house on wheels: POD THOWs Sustainable strategies to preserve tangible and intangible values in social housing rehabilitation: an Italian case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1