The Experience of Service Users with Session-Limited Psychosocial Interventions

Corentin Montiel, François Lauzier-Jobin, Stephanie Radziszewski, Julie Bordeleau, A. Beaudin, P. Roberge, M. Provencher, C. Hudon, H. Provencher, J. Houle
{"title":"The Experience of Service Users with Session-Limited Psychosocial Interventions","authors":"Corentin Montiel, François Lauzier-Jobin, Stephanie Radziszewski, Julie Bordeleau, A. Beaudin, P. Roberge, M. Provencher, C. Hudon, H. Provencher, J. Houle","doi":"10.7870/cjcmh-2022-032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This brief report focuses on the experience of service users in the context of a new public institutional framework limiting the number of psychosocial intervention sessions offered per person. Qualitative data of nine group discussions composed of 12 past service users and 12 professionals working in local community health centres were analyzed with content analysis. The study revealed that service users expressed mostly negative emotions and views attributed to session limits. This brief report suggests that rigid session-limited psychosocial interventions are perceived negatively and could have adverse consequences on recovery in vulnerable individuals.","PeriodicalId":79815,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of community mental health = Revue canadienne de sante mentale communautaire","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of community mental health = Revue canadienne de sante mentale communautaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-2022-032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This brief report focuses on the experience of service users in the context of a new public institutional framework limiting the number of psychosocial intervention sessions offered per person. Qualitative data of nine group discussions composed of 12 past service users and 12 professionals working in local community health centres were analyzed with content analysis. The study revealed that service users expressed mostly negative emotions and views attributed to session limits. This brief report suggests that rigid session-limited psychosocial interventions are perceived negatively and could have adverse consequences on recovery in vulnerable individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有限阶段社会心理干预服务使用者的经验
这份简短的报告侧重于在新的公共机构框架的背景下服务使用者的经验,该框架限制了每人提供的心理社会干预会议的次数。采用内容分析的方法分析了由12名过去的服务使用者和12名在当地社区卫生中心工作的专业人员组成的9个小组讨论的定性数据。研究显示,服务用户表达的负面情绪和观点大多归因于会话限制。这份简短的报告表明,严格的会话有限的社会心理干预被认为是负面的,可能对脆弱个体的康复产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Resilience Program for Post-Secondary Students: A Pilot Study Use of Teletherapy for the Treatment of People with Psychotic Disorders During Covid-19 Confinement: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Challenges Mental Health Complexity Among Children and Youth: Current Conceptualizations and Future Directions Implementation of Action-Based Cognitive Remediation in First Episode Psychosis: A Multi-Method Evaluation of Feasibility and Efficacy Resident Perspectives on Modular Housing: The Need for Progression, Collaboration, and Autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1