Regulating Imports into RGGI: Toward a Legal, Workable Solution

S. Welton, M. Gerrard, Jason Munster
{"title":"Regulating Imports into RGGI: Toward a Legal, Workable Solution","authors":"S. Welton, M. Gerrard, Jason Munster","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2315207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This white paper evaluates the legal workability and constitutionality of what is frequently considered the most feasible mechanism for RGGI to use in regulating imports: an obligation on RGGI “load serving entities” (LSEs) — those companies responsible for supplying electricity to end-use customers — to purchase allowances to account for the emissions associated with the electricity they sell that is imported. Ultimately, although there are many design complexities yet to be worked out, we find that an LSE-centered approach could present a viable pathway forward for RGGI states’ regulation of imports. It is likely to create long-term price signals about the value of clean energy and to help prevent emissions “leakage.” And importantly, an LSE-centered mechanism has a good chance of being found constitutional under the dormant Commerce Clause and Federal Power Act preemption. However, an LSE-centered approach also has some features that may be considered drawbacks: it would likely increase consumer prices within RGGI without sending any immediate price signals to out-of-state generators to incentivize their emissions reductions (instead, such price signals will develop over time as new clean generation and demand-side resources come on-line). Given these features, RGGI states will want to think carefully about whether an LSE-centered imports mechanism accomplishes their goals.","PeriodicalId":10506,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law School","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2315207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This white paper evaluates the legal workability and constitutionality of what is frequently considered the most feasible mechanism for RGGI to use in regulating imports: an obligation on RGGI “load serving entities” (LSEs) — those companies responsible for supplying electricity to end-use customers — to purchase allowances to account for the emissions associated with the electricity they sell that is imported. Ultimately, although there are many design complexities yet to be worked out, we find that an LSE-centered approach could present a viable pathway forward for RGGI states’ regulation of imports. It is likely to create long-term price signals about the value of clean energy and to help prevent emissions “leakage.” And importantly, an LSE-centered mechanism has a good chance of being found constitutional under the dormant Commerce Clause and Federal Power Act preemption. However, an LSE-centered approach also has some features that may be considered drawbacks: it would likely increase consumer prices within RGGI without sending any immediate price signals to out-of-state generators to incentivize their emissions reductions (instead, such price signals will develop over time as new clean generation and demand-side resources come on-line). Given these features, RGGI states will want to think carefully about whether an LSE-centered imports mechanism accomplishes their goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规范RGGI的进口:走向一个合法、可行的解决方案
本白皮书评估了通常被认为是RGGI用于监管进口的最可行机制的法律可行性和合宪性:RGGI“负荷服务实体”(lse)——负责向最终用户供电的公司——有义务购买配额,以计算与他们销售的进口电力相关的排放。最终,尽管还有许多设计上的复杂性有待解决,但我们发现,以伦敦经济学院为中心的方法可以为RGGI州的进口监管提供一条可行的前进道路。这可能会产生关于清洁能源价值的长期价格信号,并有助于防止排放“泄漏”。重要的是,一个以伦敦经济学院为中心的机制很有可能在休眠的《商业条款》和《联邦权力法案》的优先地位下被认定为符合宪法。然而,以伦敦经济学院为中心的方法也有一些可能被认为是缺点的特点:它可能会提高RGGI内的消费者价格,而不会立即向州外的发电商发出任何价格信号来激励他们减排(相反,随着新的清洁发电和需求侧资源的上线,这种价格信号将随着时间的推移而发展)。考虑到这些特性,RGGI国家需要仔细考虑以lse为中心的导入机制是否能够实现它们的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Economic Impact of Laws that Weaken Encryption Antitrust Compliance: Collusion Corporate Law and the Theory of the Firm: Reconstructing Corporations, Directors, Owners, and Investors Some Issues on the Law of Direct Damages (US and UK) Unconventional Monetary Policy Tools: Evolutionary Developments Since the General Financial Crisis (Presentation Slides)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1