Identifying needs for learning analytics adoption in Latin American universities: A mixed-methods approach

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100726
Isabel Hilliger , Margarita Ortiz-Rojas , Paola Pesántez-Cabrera , Eliana Scheihing , Yi-Shan Tsai , Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino , Tom Broos , Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright , Mar Pérez-Sanagustín
{"title":"Identifying needs for learning analytics adoption in Latin American universities: A mixed-methods approach","authors":"Isabel Hilliger ,&nbsp;Margarita Ortiz-Rojas ,&nbsp;Paola Pesántez-Cabrera ,&nbsp;Eliana Scheihing ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Tsai ,&nbsp;Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino ,&nbsp;Tom Broos ,&nbsp;Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright ,&nbsp;Mar Pérez-Sanagustín","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Learning Analytics (LA) is perceived to be a promising strategy to tackle persisting educational challenges in Latin America, such as quality disparities and high dropout rates. However, Latin American universities have fallen behind in LA adoption compared to institutions in other regions. To understand stakeholders' needs for LA services, this study used mixed methods to collect data in four Latin American Universities. Qualitative data was obtained from 37 interviews with managers and 16 focus groups with 51 teaching staff and 45 students, whereas quantitative data was obtained from surveys answered by 1884 students and 368 teaching staff. According to the triangulation of both types of evidence, we found that (1) students need quality feedback and timely support, (2) teaching staff need timely alerts and meaningful performance evaluations, and (3) managers need quality information to implement support interventions. Thus, LA offers an opportunity to integrate data-driven decision-making in existing tasks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100726","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751620300026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Learning Analytics (LA) is perceived to be a promising strategy to tackle persisting educational challenges in Latin America, such as quality disparities and high dropout rates. However, Latin American universities have fallen behind in LA adoption compared to institutions in other regions. To understand stakeholders' needs for LA services, this study used mixed methods to collect data in four Latin American Universities. Qualitative data was obtained from 37 interviews with managers and 16 focus groups with 51 teaching staff and 45 students, whereas quantitative data was obtained from surveys answered by 1884 students and 368 teaching staff. According to the triangulation of both types of evidence, we found that (1) students need quality feedback and timely support, (2) teaching staff need timely alerts and meaningful performance evaluations, and (3) managers need quality information to implement support interventions. Thus, LA offers an opportunity to integrate data-driven decision-making in existing tasks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别拉丁美洲大学采用学习分析的需求:一种混合方法
学习分析(LA)被认为是解决拉丁美洲持续存在的教育挑战(如质量差距和高辍学率)的一种有前途的策略。然而,与其他地区的大学相比,拉丁美洲的大学在洛杉矶的录取方面落后了。为了了解利益相关者对洛杉矶服务的需求,本研究采用混合方法收集了四所拉丁美洲大学的数据。定性数据来自对37位管理者的访谈和16个焦点小组对51名教职员工和45名学生的访谈,定量数据来自1884名学生和368名教职员工的调查。根据这两类证据的三角测量,我们发现(1)学生需要高质量的反馈和及时的支持,(2)教学人员需要及时的提醒和有意义的绩效评估,(3)管理者需要高质量的信息来实施支持干预。因此,LA提供了在现有任务中集成数据驱动决策的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory study of an AI-supported discussion representational tool for online collaborative learning in a Chinese university Editorial Board Exploring the influential factors of online professional learning completion of college teachers from the Global South in an international training program Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1