Implementing psychologically informed environments in homelessness services: a qualitative exploration of staff teams’ self-assessments

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Housing Care and Support Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1108/hcs-09-2021-0026
Sophie Buckley, Anna Tickle
{"title":"Implementing psychologically informed environments in homelessness services: a qualitative exploration of staff teams’ self-assessments","authors":"Sophie Buckley, Anna Tickle","doi":"10.1108/hcs-09-2021-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore the perceptions of staff in four teams regarding the implementation of psychologically informed environments (PIE) across a community service and three hostels supporting individuals facing severe and multiple disadvantage.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a pre-post design, the PIEs Assessment and Self-Development for Services (known as the Pizazz) was completed by staff before the implementation of PIEs and at a six-month follow-up. A narrative review of the results and thematic analysis of the qualitative data are presented.\n\n\nFindings\nThe majority of the Pizazz elements were rated as improved following PIE implementation. Thematic analysis developed three themes influencing staff members’ ability to develop a PIE: Complexities of Our and Wider Systems; Ready-made or Baked from Scratch; and Reflective and Responsive Staff.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nA planned one-year follow-up was obstructed by the coronavirus pandemic, limiting understanding of longer-term impact. Having only gathered data from staff members, the results cannot corroborate staff members’ perceptions. Further research could explore other stakeholder perspectives, as well as the impact of PIE implementation on staff perception of resources, and of a possible ceiling effect for hostels trying to develop PIE.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the authors’ best of knowledge, this is the first UK study to use the Pizazz to evaluate the implementation of PIE.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-09-2021-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the perceptions of staff in four teams regarding the implementation of psychologically informed environments (PIE) across a community service and three hostels supporting individuals facing severe and multiple disadvantage. Design/methodology/approach Using a pre-post design, the PIEs Assessment and Self-Development for Services (known as the Pizazz) was completed by staff before the implementation of PIEs and at a six-month follow-up. A narrative review of the results and thematic analysis of the qualitative data are presented. Findings The majority of the Pizazz elements were rated as improved following PIE implementation. Thematic analysis developed three themes influencing staff members’ ability to develop a PIE: Complexities of Our and Wider Systems; Ready-made or Baked from Scratch; and Reflective and Responsive Staff. Research limitations/implications A planned one-year follow-up was obstructed by the coronavirus pandemic, limiting understanding of longer-term impact. Having only gathered data from staff members, the results cannot corroborate staff members’ perceptions. Further research could explore other stakeholder perspectives, as well as the impact of PIE implementation on staff perception of resources, and of a possible ceiling effect for hostels trying to develop PIE. Originality/value To the authors’ best of knowledge, this is the first UK study to use the Pizazz to evaluate the implementation of PIE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在无家可归者服务中实施心理知情环境:对工作人员团队自我评估的定性探索
目的本研究旨在探讨四个团队的员工对在一个社区服务和三个青年旅舍中实施心理知情环境(PIE)的看法,以支持面临严重和多重不利的个人。设计/方法/方法采用岗位前设计,由员工在实施个人服务评估及自我发展计划前及六个月跟进后完成。对结果进行叙述性回顾,并对定性数据进行专题分析。大多数Pizazz元素在PIE实施后被评为改进。专题分析确定了影响工作人员制定PIE能力的三个主题:我们和更广泛系统的复杂性;现成的或从零开始烤的;以及反思和响应的员工。研究限制/影响一项计划为期一年的随访因冠状病毒大流行而受阻,限制了对长期影响的了解。由于只收集了工作人员的数据,结果无法证实工作人员的看法。进一步的研究可以探讨其他持份者的观点,以及实施PIE对员工对资源认知的影响,以及对试图发展PIE的青年旅舍可能产生的天花板效应。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是英国第一个使用Pizazz来评估PIE实施的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Social housing development: a case study in Bac Ninh province, Vietnam Reviewing the affordability and adequacy of affordable housing in urban India: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic Filling in the gaps: examining the prevalence of Black homelessness in Canada Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review Choosing invisibility? Exploring service (dis)engagement of women experiencing multiple disadvantage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1