Rowayda Eltarawy, E. Naguib, Ahmed Z. Elhoshy, Sara H. Younis
{"title":"Effect of Chlorhexidine on Nanoleakage and Bond Durability of Two Adhesives to Dentin: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Rowayda Eltarawy, E. Naguib, Ahmed Z. Elhoshy, Sara H. Younis","doi":"10.54623/fdj.80211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effect of chlorhexidine CHX on nanoleakage and dentin bond durability of two adhesives after water storage. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six extracted molars were divided into three groups and their buccal surfaces were reduced to expose flat dentin surfaces. In group 1 Single Bond Universal Adhesive SBU was used, in group 2 Peak universal Bond PUB was applied while in group 3 Chlorhexidine Gluconate Disinfecting Solution followed by Single Bond Universal Adhesive (CHX+SBU) was used. Application of resin composite restorations was performed in all three groups. For each bonding procedure, specimens were subdivided into three subgroups according to storage period (24 hours, three & six months). After storage, resin-dentin slabs were obtained, immersed in silver nitrate and then photo developed. NL was evaluated with scanning electron microscopy. Data were explored for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests and showed parametric distribution. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test was used to compare between more than two groups in non-related samples. Repeated measure ANOVA test was used to compare between more than two groups in related samples. Paired sample t-test was used to compare between two groups in related samples. Two-way ANOVA was used to test the interaction between different variables. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with IBMSPSSStatistics Version 20 for Windows. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected between SBU, PUB and CHX SBU at 24 hours. For stored specimens, there was no statistically significant difference between (SBU) and PUB, but a statistically significant difference occurred between both of them and CHX SBU. Conclusions: Chlorhexidine containing universal adhesive suppressed the occurrence of nanoleakage at the interface, while chlorhexidine as a therapeutic primer had an adverse effect. Water storage negatively affected bond durability of chlorhexidine containing and free universal adhesives by showing more nanoleakage at the interface.","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.80211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effect of chlorhexidine CHX on nanoleakage and dentin bond durability of two adhesives after water storage. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six extracted molars were divided into three groups and their buccal surfaces were reduced to expose flat dentin surfaces. In group 1 Single Bond Universal Adhesive SBU was used, in group 2 Peak universal Bond PUB was applied while in group 3 Chlorhexidine Gluconate Disinfecting Solution followed by Single Bond Universal Adhesive (CHX+SBU) was used. Application of resin composite restorations was performed in all three groups. For each bonding procedure, specimens were subdivided into three subgroups according to storage period (24 hours, three & six months). After storage, resin-dentin slabs were obtained, immersed in silver nitrate and then photo developed. NL was evaluated with scanning electron microscopy. Data were explored for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests and showed parametric distribution. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test was used to compare between more than two groups in non-related samples. Repeated measure ANOVA test was used to compare between more than two groups in related samples. Paired sample t-test was used to compare between two groups in related samples. Two-way ANOVA was used to test the interaction between different variables. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with IBMSPSSStatistics Version 20 for Windows. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected between SBU, PUB and CHX SBU at 24 hours. For stored specimens, there was no statistically significant difference between (SBU) and PUB, but a statistically significant difference occurred between both of them and CHX SBU. Conclusions: Chlorhexidine containing universal adhesive suppressed the occurrence of nanoleakage at the interface, while chlorhexidine as a therapeutic primer had an adverse effect. Water storage negatively affected bond durability of chlorhexidine containing and free universal adhesives by showing more nanoleakage at the interface.
目的:研究氯己定CHX对两种胶粘剂储水后纳米渗漏及牙本质黏结耐久性的影响。材料与方法:将36颗拔除的磨牙分为3组,将其颊面缩小,露出平整的牙本质面。第1组采用单键万能胶SBU,第2组采用峰值万能胶PUB,第3组采用葡萄糖酸氯己定消毒液加单键万能胶(CHX+SBU)。三组均采用树脂复合修复体。在每个粘接过程中,根据保存时间(24小时,3个月和6个月)将标本细分为三个亚组。储存后,获得树脂牙本质板,浸在硝酸银中,然后显影。用扫描电镜评价NL。使用Kolmogorov-Smirnov和Shapiro-Wilk检验对数据进行正态性检验,并显示参数分布。在非相关样本中,采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行两组以上样本的比较。两组以上相关样本间比较采用重复测量方差分析。两组相关样本间比较采用配对样本t检验。采用双向方差分析检验不同变量之间的交互作用。显著性水平为P≤0.05。使用IBMSPSSStatistics Version 20 for Windows进行统计分析。结果:24小时时SBU、PUB、CHX SBU差异无统计学意义。对于保存标本,(SBU)与PUB之间差异无统计学意义,但两者与CHX SBU之间差异有统计学意义。结论:含万能粘接剂的氯己定能抑制界面纳米渗漏的发生,而作为治疗引物的氯己定则有不良反应。水的储存对含氯己定和不含氯己定的通用胶粘剂的粘结耐久性产生负面影响,在界面处表现出更多的纳米泄漏。