Prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly during the transition to mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States.

Teratology Pub Date : 2002-07-01 DOI:10.1002/TERA.10060
Laura J. Williams, Cara T Mai, L. Edmonds, G. Shaw, R. Kirby, C. Hobbs, L. Sever, L. Miller, F. Meaney, M. Levitt
{"title":"Prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly during the transition to mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States.","authors":"Laura J. Williams, Cara T Mai, L. Edmonds, G. Shaw, R. Kirby, C. Hobbs, L. Sever, L. Miller, F. Meaney, M. Levitt","doi":"10.1002/TERA.10060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIn 1992, the United States Public Health Service recommended that all women of childbearing age consume 400 microg of folic acid daily. The Food and Drug Administration authorized the addition of synthetic folic acid to grain products in March 1996 with mandatory compliance by January 1998. The impact of these public health policies on the prevalence of neural tube defects needs to be evaluated. We sought to determine the prevalences of spina bifida and anencephaly during the transition to mandatory folic acid fortification.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwenty-four population-based surveillance systems were used to identify 5,630 cases of spina bifida and anencephaly from 1995-99. Cases were divided into three temporal categories depending on whether neural tube development occurred before folic acid fortification (January 1995 to December 1996), during optional fortification (January 1997 to September 1998), or during mandatory fortification (October 1998 to December 1999). Prevalences for each defect were calculated for each time period. Data were also stratified by programs that did and did not ascertain prenatally diagnosed cases.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe prevalence of spina bifida decreased 31% (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63-0.74) from the pre- to the mandatory fortification period and the prevalence of anencephaly decreased 16% (PR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75-0.95). Stratification by prenatal ascertainment did not alter results for spina bifida but did impact anencephaly trends.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe decline in the prevalence of spina bifida was temporally associated with folic acid fortification of US grain supplies. The temporal association between fortification and the prevalence of anencephaly is unclear.","PeriodicalId":22211,"journal":{"name":"Teratology","volume":"20 1","pages":"33-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"274","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/TERA.10060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 274

Abstract

BACKGROUND In 1992, the United States Public Health Service recommended that all women of childbearing age consume 400 microg of folic acid daily. The Food and Drug Administration authorized the addition of synthetic folic acid to grain products in March 1996 with mandatory compliance by January 1998. The impact of these public health policies on the prevalence of neural tube defects needs to be evaluated. We sought to determine the prevalences of spina bifida and anencephaly during the transition to mandatory folic acid fortification. METHODS Twenty-four population-based surveillance systems were used to identify 5,630 cases of spina bifida and anencephaly from 1995-99. Cases were divided into three temporal categories depending on whether neural tube development occurred before folic acid fortification (January 1995 to December 1996), during optional fortification (January 1997 to September 1998), or during mandatory fortification (October 1998 to December 1999). Prevalences for each defect were calculated for each time period. Data were also stratified by programs that did and did not ascertain prenatally diagnosed cases. RESULTS The prevalence of spina bifida decreased 31% (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63-0.74) from the pre- to the mandatory fortification period and the prevalence of anencephaly decreased 16% (PR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75-0.95). Stratification by prenatal ascertainment did not alter results for spina bifida but did impact anencephaly trends. CONCLUSIONS The decline in the prevalence of spina bifida was temporally associated with folic acid fortification of US grain supplies. The temporal association between fortification and the prevalence of anencephaly is unclear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国向强制性叶酸强化过渡期间脊柱裂和无脑畸形的患病率。
背景1992年,美国公共卫生局建议所有育龄妇女每天摄入400微克的叶酸。美国食品和药物管理局于1996年3月批准在谷物产品中添加合成叶酸,并于1998年1月强制执行。需要评估这些公共卫生政策对神经管缺陷患病率的影响。我们试图确定过渡到强制性叶酸强化期间脊柱裂和无脑畸形的患病率。方法采用24个基于人群的监测系统,对1995- 1999年的5630例脊柱裂和无脑畸形进行监测。根据神经管发育是否发生在叶酸强化前(1995年1月至1996年12月)、是否发生在选择性强化期间(1997年1月至1998年9月)、是否发生在强制性强化期间(1998年10月至1999年12月),将病例分为三种时间类型。每个缺陷的流行率在每个时间段被计算出来。数据也通过确定和不确定产前诊断病例的程序分层。结果从强制强化前到强制强化期,脊柱裂患病率下降了31%(患病率比[PR] = 0.69, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.63 ~ 0.74),无脑畸形患病率下降了16% (PR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75 ~ 0.95)。产前确定分层不改变脊柱裂的结果,但确实影响无脑畸形的趋势。结论脊柱裂患病率的下降与美国粮食供应中叶酸的强化有关。强化与无脑畸形患病率之间的时间关联尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Link between Male Genital Anomalies and Adult Male Reproductive Disorders: A Population-Based Data Linkage Study Spanning over 40 Years A new rapid radiological procedure for routine teratological use in bone ossification assessment: a supplement for staining methods. Timing of prenatal care initiation and risk of congenital malformations. Quantification and localization of expression of the retinoic acid receptor-beta and -gamma mRNA isoforms during neurulation in mouse embryos with or without spina bifida. Statement of the Public Affairs Committee of the Teratology Society on the fetal alcohol syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1