Examination of Factors Associated With Informal Caregivers’ Reactions to Different Problem Behaviors Among Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease

Junrong Shi, C. Scott
{"title":"Examination of Factors Associated With Informal Caregivers’ Reactions to Different Problem Behaviors Among Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease","authors":"Junrong Shi, C. Scott","doi":"10.1177/10848223231162861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem behaviors among persons with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) have a significant impact on caregivers. However, caregivers’ subjective reaction to the problem behaviors better predicts the caregiving outcomes than the objective frequency of problem behaviors. With a sample recruited from community agencies serving Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) caregivers (n = 108), this study examined the effect of various factors on the caregivers ’reaction to different types of problem behaviors, including demographics, caregivers’ knowledge about the AD, and resilience level, controlling for the frequency of problem behaviors and other caregiving context factors. Caregivers’ reaction to problem behaviors was measured by the Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist. Findings indicated that African American caregivers had a lower level of reactions to disruptive ( B = −3.956; p < .01) and depressive behaviors ( B = −2.443; p < .05) than white caregivers, but not for memory-loss problems. Age, being spousal caregivers, and knowledge of AD only affected reactions to memory-loss problems but not for other types of behaviors. No effects were observed for personal resilience. Intervention should be tailored to the varied needs of family caregivers to deal with problem behaviors among people with AD to delay institutionalization. More training/resources at the skill level over the information-only caregiver intervention should be promoted.","PeriodicalId":45762,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223231162861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem behaviors among persons with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) have a significant impact on caregivers. However, caregivers’ subjective reaction to the problem behaviors better predicts the caregiving outcomes than the objective frequency of problem behaviors. With a sample recruited from community agencies serving Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) caregivers (n = 108), this study examined the effect of various factors on the caregivers ’reaction to different types of problem behaviors, including demographics, caregivers’ knowledge about the AD, and resilience level, controlling for the frequency of problem behaviors and other caregiving context factors. Caregivers’ reaction to problem behaviors was measured by the Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist. Findings indicated that African American caregivers had a lower level of reactions to disruptive ( B = −3.956; p < .01) and depressive behaviors ( B = −2.443; p < .05) than white caregivers, but not for memory-loss problems. Age, being spousal caregivers, and knowledge of AD only affected reactions to memory-loss problems but not for other types of behaviors. No effects were observed for personal resilience. Intervention should be tailored to the varied needs of family caregivers to deal with problem behaviors among people with AD to delay institutionalization. More training/resources at the skill level over the information-only caregiver intervention should be promoted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非正式照顾者对阿尔茨海默病患者不同问题行为的反应相关因素的研究
阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的问题行为对照顾者有重大影响。然而,照顾者对问题行为的主观反应比问题行为的客观频率更能预测照顾结果。本研究从服务阿尔茨海默病(AD)护理人员的社区机构中招募样本(n = 108),在控制问题行为发生频率和其他护理环境因素的情况下,研究了人口统计学、护理人员对AD的知识和心理弹性水平等因素对护理人员对不同类型问题行为反应的影响。照护者对问题行为的反应采用修正记忆与行为问题检查表进行测量。研究结果表明,非裔美国看护者对破坏性行为的反应水平较低(B =−3.956;p < 0.01)和抑郁行为(B =−2.443;P < 0.05),但在记忆丧失问题上没有差异。年龄、配偶的照顾和对阿尔茨海默病的了解只影响对记忆丧失问题的反应,而对其他类型的行为没有影响。没有观察到对个人恢复力的影响。干预应根据家庭照顾者的不同需求进行调整,以处理AD患者的问题行为,以延迟机构化。应提倡在技能水平上提供更多的培训/资源,而不是仅提供信息的护理人员干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Management & Practice is a comprehensive resource for clinicians, case managers, and administrators providing home and community based health care. Articles address diverse issues, ranging from individual patient care and case management to the human resource management and organizational operations management and administration of organizations and agencies. Regular columns focus on research, legal issues, psychosocial perspectives, accreditation and licensing, compliance, management, and cultural diversity. Specific topics include treatment, care and therapeutic techniques, cultural competence, family caregivers, equipment management, human resources, home health center.
期刊最新文献
Inter-Organizational Home Care Nursing Teams: A Comparison of a Region Wide Organizational Change Initiative With Success Factors Identified by Forerunners and Team Theory Is Palliative Care Cost-Effective? A Systematic Review of the Literature “They Are Lost Souls”: Medicare Home Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Medicare’s Inadequate Coverage of Homebound Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease An Online, Self-Report Version of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST-SR) to Identify Fall-Related Hazards in the Homes of Older People The Effect on Home Caregivers of a Family Support Program Based on a Nurse-Led Case Management Model: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1