The Top-Up Programme: Two decades of widening participation provides evidence of impact on student success against a background of socio-economic disadvantage

A. Browitt, N. Croll, Kelly Hedge-Holmes, Kirstin Henry
{"title":"The Top-Up Programme: Two decades of widening participation provides evidence of impact on student success against a background of socio-economic disadvantage","authors":"A. Browitt, N. Croll, Kelly Hedge-Holmes, Kirstin Henry","doi":"10.5456/wpll.24.3.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper highlights a successful pre-entry programme whilst providing an example of evaluation research methodology. The key contribution made is the power of scale. As the programme has been running since 1999 with the same aims, academic focus and structures, it provides the unique\n extent of longitudinal data available for study. Comparative analysis to determine student success outcomes utilised the methodology described by Walker et al (2004), for performance in Year 1 of a single cohort, and was expanded to include statistical analysis of student continuation and\n degree completion. The intervention group, who participated in the widening participation programme before commencing an undergraduate degree at one higher education institution, is more socio-economically disadvantaged than the comparison groups and yet, we demonstrated no significant difference\n in outcomes at cohort level. We show that those from the most socioeconomically disadvantaged postcodes were slightly more likely to perform well in Year 1, continue and complete their degree. We conclude the programme engages with and provides the most benefit for the widening access target\n group identified by the Scottish Government.","PeriodicalId":90763,"journal":{"name":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.24.3.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper highlights a successful pre-entry programme whilst providing an example of evaluation research methodology. The key contribution made is the power of scale. As the programme has been running since 1999 with the same aims, academic focus and structures, it provides the unique extent of longitudinal data available for study. Comparative analysis to determine student success outcomes utilised the methodology described by Walker et al (2004), for performance in Year 1 of a single cohort, and was expanded to include statistical analysis of student continuation and degree completion. The intervention group, who participated in the widening participation programme before commencing an undergraduate degree at one higher education institution, is more socio-economically disadvantaged than the comparison groups and yet, we demonstrated no significant difference in outcomes at cohort level. We show that those from the most socioeconomically disadvantaged postcodes were slightly more likely to perform well in Year 1, continue and complete their degree. We conclude the programme engages with and provides the most benefit for the widening access target group identified by the Scottish Government.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充计划:二十年来不断扩大的参与证明了在社会经济不利的背景下对学生成功的影响
本文强调了一个成功的入学前计划,同时提供了一个评估研究方法的例子。最关键的贡献是规模的力量。由于该项目自1999年以来一直以相同的目标、学术重点和结构运行,它为研究提供了独特的纵向数据范围。确定学生成功结果的比较分析使用了Walker等人(2004)描述的方法,用于单个队列的第一年表现,并扩展到包括学生继续学习和学位完成的统计分析。干预组在开始在一所高等教育机构攻读本科学位之前参加了扩大参与计划,与对照组相比,他们在社会经济方面处于更不利的地位,然而,我们在队列水平上没有证明结果有显著差异。我们发现,那些来自社会经济地位最不利的邮政编码地区的学生在第一年表现良好,继续并完成学位的可能性略高。我们的结论是,该方案与苏格兰政府确定的扩大访问目标群体接触并为其提供最大利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher education policies for applicants with criminal records in the United Kingdom: Are universities ‘banning the box’? Scientist encounters: Igniting parental aspirations to support young scientists ‐ a pilot study Editorial – general edition A typology of social equity discourses and its contribution to a wicked problem Can role models help encourage young people to apply to (selective) universities? Evidence from a large-scale English field experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1