Unified protocols for transdiagnostic treatment versus the Beckian’s approach of cognitive behavioral therapy for medical students with emotional disorders

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.2478/amma-2022-0002
C. Popa, P. Oláh, C. Cojocaru, Z. Jakab, D. Ghiga, Alina Schenk
{"title":"Unified protocols for transdiagnostic treatment versus the Beckian’s approach of cognitive behavioral therapy for medical students with emotional disorders","authors":"C. Popa, P. Oláh, C. Cojocaru, Z. Jakab, D. Ghiga, Alina Schenk","doi":"10.2478/amma-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Emotional disorders are highly prevalent among medical students, impacting their academic performance and general quality of life. It was shown that cognitive-behavioral and emotion regulation strategies are efficient for reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in young people. Objective: This study aims to compare the efficiency of standard individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) to a group intervention based on the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment (UPTT) of emotional disorders in two groups of medical students with similar baseline characteristics. Method: The sample of this research was composed of 64 medical students in total, of which 34 were included in the CBT group (Mage= 19.5 years, SD= 0.96) and 30 were included in the UPTT group (Mage= 19.4 years, SD= 0.93). The level of irrational beliefs and emotional distress were measured before and after the interventions, which were carried out by certificated psychotherapists. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between pre-test and post-test in both groups. The level of irrational beliefs dropped after the CBT (M=62.91, SD=21.30, p<0.05) and the UPTT intervention (M=67.33, SD=34.89, p<0.05), respectively. Similarly, the profile of emotional distress changed after the CBT (M=77.62, SD=16.97, p<0.05) and the UPTT intervention (M=68.77, SD=20.06, p<0.01). Conclusion: Psychological interventions relying on cognitive-behavioral approaches, including standard, individual psychotherapy and a group intervention designed according to a transdiagnostic protocol, are suitable methods for reducing emotional disorders among medical students.","PeriodicalId":36282,"journal":{"name":"Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Emotional disorders are highly prevalent among medical students, impacting their academic performance and general quality of life. It was shown that cognitive-behavioral and emotion regulation strategies are efficient for reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in young people. Objective: This study aims to compare the efficiency of standard individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) to a group intervention based on the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment (UPTT) of emotional disorders in two groups of medical students with similar baseline characteristics. Method: The sample of this research was composed of 64 medical students in total, of which 34 were included in the CBT group (Mage= 19.5 years, SD= 0.96) and 30 were included in the UPTT group (Mage= 19.4 years, SD= 0.93). The level of irrational beliefs and emotional distress were measured before and after the interventions, which were carried out by certificated psychotherapists. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between pre-test and post-test in both groups. The level of irrational beliefs dropped after the CBT (M=62.91, SD=21.30, p<0.05) and the UPTT intervention (M=67.33, SD=34.89, p<0.05), respectively. Similarly, the profile of emotional distress changed after the CBT (M=77.62, SD=16.97, p<0.05) and the UPTT intervention (M=68.77, SD=20.06, p<0.01). Conclusion: Psychological interventions relying on cognitive-behavioral approaches, including standard, individual psychotherapy and a group intervention designed according to a transdiagnostic protocol, are suitable methods for reducing emotional disorders among medical students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统一的跨诊断治疗方案与贝克的认知行为治疗方法对情绪障碍医学生的影响
摘要背景:情绪障碍在医学生中非常普遍,影响着他们的学习成绩和总体生活质量。研究表明,认知行为和情绪调节策略可以有效地减轻青少年的焦虑和抑郁症状。目的:本研究旨在比较两组基线特征相似的医学生情绪障碍的标准个体认知行为治疗(CBT)与基于跨诊断治疗统一方案(UPTT)的群体干预的效果。方法:本研究共纳入64名医学生,其中CBT组34人(Mage= 19.5 years, SD= 0.96), UPTT组30人(Mage= 19.4 years, SD= 0.93)。在干预之前和之后测量了非理性信念和情绪困扰的水平,这些干预由认证的心理治疗师进行。结果:两组测试前与测试后差异均有统计学意义。CBT干预后(M=62.91, SD=21.30, p<0.05)和UPTT干预后(M=67.33, SD=34.89, p<0.05),非理性信念水平下降。同样,在CBT (M=77.62, SD=16.97, p<0.05)和UPTT干预(M=68.77, SD=20.06, p<0.01)后,情绪困扰状况发生了变化。结论:基于认知行为方法的心理干预,包括标准心理治疗、个体心理治疗和根据跨诊断方案设计的群体干预,是减少医学生情绪障碍的合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica
Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nucleostemin and p-STAT3 as early diagnostic potential markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma Packed cell volume and its relation to obesity, gender and smoking status Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm – Management of an extremely rare case of pancreatic tumor in a young patient Psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and their combination in the treatment of major depressive disorder: How well are we making use of available therapies? Histological patterns of testicular biopsy in patients with azoospermia: single-institution experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1