The Lost Cameo, the Vanished Statue of the Emperor and Constantine as a New Alexander

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.31743/vp.14119
P. Grotowski
{"title":"The Lost Cameo, the Vanished Statue of the Emperor and Constantine as a New Alexander","authors":"P. Grotowski","doi":"10.31743/vp.14119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to propose a reinterpretation of the meaning of the lost colossus of Constantine the Great from the Forum of his name in Constantinople, in the light of the iconography of the emperor on the cameo from the cathedral in the Pomeranian town of Cammin. Although the gem was lost during the last war, it is known to us thanks to archival photographs and the plaster cast housed at Göttingen University. On this basis, Gerda Bruns associated the jewel with the statue of Constantine on the porphyry column in the New Rome, and her identification has since been widely accepted by the scholarly milieu. In recent years one has been able to observe growing popularity of this interpretation among researchers, who however refrain in their studies from pointing to the consequences of such a reconstruction of the statue’s form. \n            The author of this paper points out that Constantine purposefully chose the iconographical type of Alexander-ktistes as a model for his own representation in order to allude to his great predecessor and the founder of a number of cities which bore his name. The iconography of the statue became then a part of the programme of the celebrations arranged on the occasion of the dedication of Constantinople, in which numerous references to Alexander played the key role. This new understanding of the colossus, placing its significance within the frames of political propaganda, better matches the actual historical circumstances and the ruler’s attitude towards Christendom than traditional interpretations which recognised the statue as Helios or Apollo, and thus introduced an incoherence — difficult to explain — in Constantine’s attitude towards the new religion. This cumbersome question, which baffled the inquisitive minds already in the Constantinople of the Byzantine era, will be considered unsubstantial if we correctly interpret the monument on the Forum solely in the political and propagandistic context.","PeriodicalId":23994,"journal":{"name":"Vox Patrum","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Patrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.14119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose a reinterpretation of the meaning of the lost colossus of Constantine the Great from the Forum of his name in Constantinople, in the light of the iconography of the emperor on the cameo from the cathedral in the Pomeranian town of Cammin. Although the gem was lost during the last war, it is known to us thanks to archival photographs and the plaster cast housed at Göttingen University. On this basis, Gerda Bruns associated the jewel with the statue of Constantine on the porphyry column in the New Rome, and her identification has since been widely accepted by the scholarly milieu. In recent years one has been able to observe growing popularity of this interpretation among researchers, who however refrain in their studies from pointing to the consequences of such a reconstruction of the statue’s form.             The author of this paper points out that Constantine purposefully chose the iconographical type of Alexander-ktistes as a model for his own representation in order to allude to his great predecessor and the founder of a number of cities which bore his name. The iconography of the statue became then a part of the programme of the celebrations arranged on the occasion of the dedication of Constantinople, in which numerous references to Alexander played the key role. This new understanding of the colossus, placing its significance within the frames of political propaganda, better matches the actual historical circumstances and the ruler’s attitude towards Christendom than traditional interpretations which recognised the statue as Helios or Apollo, and thus introduced an incoherence — difficult to explain — in Constantine’s attitude towards the new religion. This cumbersome question, which baffled the inquisitive minds already in the Constantinople of the Byzantine era, will be considered unsubstantial if we correctly interpret the monument on the Forum solely in the political and propagandistic context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失落的浮雕,消失的皇帝雕像和新亚历山大的君士坦丁
本文的目的是提出一个重新解释的意义,从君士坦丁堡广场他的名字的伟大的君士坦丁大帝,在光的肖像上的皇帝的浮雕在卡明的波美拉尼亚镇的大教堂。虽然这颗宝石在上次战争中丢失了,但由于档案照片和Göttingen大学的石膏模型,我们知道了它。在此基础上,Gerda Bruns将这颗宝石与新罗马斑岩柱上的君士坦丁雕像联系起来,她的鉴定从此被学术界广泛接受。近年来,人们已经能够观察到这种解释在研究人员中越来越受欢迎,然而,他们在研究中避免指出这种重建雕像形式的后果。本文的作者指出,君士坦丁有意选择亚历山大-克蒂斯特的肖像类型作为自己的表现模式,是为了影射他的伟大前任和许多以他的名字命名的城市的缔造者。在君士坦丁堡落成之际,雕像的肖像成为庆祝活动的一部分,其中许多对亚历山大的提及发挥了关键作用。这种对巨像的新理解,将其重要性置于政治宣传的框架内,比传统的认为雕像是太阳神或阿波罗的解释更符合实际的历史环境和统治者对基督教的态度,从而引入了君士坦丁对新宗教的态度的不连贯-难以解释。这个麻烦的问题,已经在拜占庭时代的君士坦丁堡困惑好奇的头脑,如果我们正确地解释广场上的纪念碑仅仅在政治和宣传的背景下,将被认为是不实质性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Filoksen z Mabbug, O tym, jak przyjmować Komunię Świętą na rękę Polska bibliografia antyku chrześcijańskiego 2023. Z uzupełnieniami za rok 2022 Bibliografia do "Testamentu Abrahama" Galatians 6:17 and its Reception History: Assessing the Echoes Walka Hieronima z herezjami chrystologicznymi w świetle nauczania o Chrystusie zawartym w jego Listach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1