In-vitro Evaluation of Microleakage in Root Canal Obturation with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement Using Fluid Filtration

S. Mousavi, A. Akhavan, Shirin Shahnaseri, Fahime Razavi, Amirali Zahedinejad, Erfan Kolahdouzan
{"title":"In-vitro Evaluation of Microleakage in Root Canal Obturation with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement Using Fluid Filtration","authors":"S. Mousavi, A. Akhavan, Shirin Shahnaseri, Fahime Razavi, Amirali Zahedinejad, Erfan Kolahdouzan","doi":"10.22038/JDMT.2019.12379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Endodontic treatment failure is caused by the leakage of microorganisms and endotoxins, which leads to pathological lesions. Adequate seal of the root canal is essential to preventing recontamination and ensuring the long-term clinical success rate. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture cement (CEM) are common types of cement with adequate sealing capability in endodontics. The present study aimed to compare the microleakage in the root canals filled with ProRoot MTA and CEM cement using fluid filtration. Methods: This experimental, in-vitro study was conducted on 46 root canals of extracted mandibular premolars. After preparation and disinfection with 3% sodium hypochlorite, the crowns were resected from the cervical region. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups of 20 based on the tested materials (ProRoot MTA and CEM cement), as well as two negative and positive control groups of three. All the samples were instrumented and obturated using the step-back technique, and fluid filtration was used to evaluate sealing ability and leakage inhibition. Data analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (α=0.05). Results: Mean microleakage in the ProRoot MTA and CEM cement was 2±0.79 and 3.02±1.38 µL/8 min, respectively. In addition, a significant difference was observed between the two groups in this regard (P<0.011).Conclusion: According to the results, ProRoot MTA provided significantly less microleakage compared to the CEM cement. Therefore, the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA was higher than the CEM cement, which makes MTA a better material than CEM cement for canal obturation.","PeriodicalId":15640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","volume":"41 1","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JDMT.2019.12379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontic treatment failure is caused by the leakage of microorganisms and endotoxins, which leads to pathological lesions. Adequate seal of the root canal is essential to preventing recontamination and ensuring the long-term clinical success rate. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture cement (CEM) are common types of cement with adequate sealing capability in endodontics. The present study aimed to compare the microleakage in the root canals filled with ProRoot MTA and CEM cement using fluid filtration. Methods: This experimental, in-vitro study was conducted on 46 root canals of extracted mandibular premolars. After preparation and disinfection with 3% sodium hypochlorite, the crowns were resected from the cervical region. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups of 20 based on the tested materials (ProRoot MTA and CEM cement), as well as two negative and positive control groups of three. All the samples were instrumented and obturated using the step-back technique, and fluid filtration was used to evaluate sealing ability and leakage inhibition. Data analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (α=0.05). Results: Mean microleakage in the ProRoot MTA and CEM cement was 2±0.79 and 3.02±1.38 µL/8 min, respectively. In addition, a significant difference was observed between the two groups in this regard (P<0.011).Conclusion: According to the results, ProRoot MTA provided significantly less microleakage compared to the CEM cement. Therefore, the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA was higher than the CEM cement, which makes MTA a better material than CEM cement for canal obturation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体过滤法评价三氧化矿物骨料与富钙水泥充填根管微渗漏的体外研究
牙髓治疗失败是由于微生物和内毒素的渗漏导致病理病变。充分的根管密封是防止再污染和保证长期临床成功率的关键。三氧化矿物骨料(MTA)和富钙混合水泥(CEM)是牙髓学中常用的具有良好密封能力的水泥。本研究的目的是比较液体过滤下prooroot MTA和CEM水泥充填根管的微渗漏情况。方法:对46颗拔除的下颌前磨牙根管进行体外实验研究。制备后用3%次氯酸钠消毒,取冠。根据检测材料(prooroot MTA和CEM水泥)随机分为两组,每组20颗,阴性对照组和阳性对照组各3颗。所有样品均采用步进式密封技术进行密封,并采用流体过滤来评估密封能力和泄漏抑制能力。数据分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验(α=0.05)。结果:prooroot MTA和CEM水泥的平均微渗漏量分别为2±0.79和3.02±1.38µL/8 min。两组在这方面比较有显著性差异(P<0.011)。结论:与CEM水泥相比,prooroot MTA提供的微渗漏明显减少。因此,prooroot MTA的封堵能力高于CEM水泥,这使得MTA成为比CEM水泥更好的根管封堵材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Citric Acid in Endodontics: A Review The Evaluation of the Effect of Coffee Staining and 16% Carbamide Peroxide Bleaching on the Color Change of Chairside CAD/CAM Ceramics Intentional Replantation: an Approach to Save Hopeless Natural Teeth (A Case Report) The Effect of Linear and Angular Midline Deviation on Smile Attractiveness Regarding Facial Height Evaluation of the Polymerization Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1