Setting safety priorities

Gary Rowe
{"title":"Setting safety priorities","authors":"Gary Rowe","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90063-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the current practices employed in many parts of the world for managing risks and setting safety priorities and outlines the development of a model which will satisfy both the technical and sociological requirements for determining valid safety priorities.</p><p>Various methods used for setting safety priorities were examined and broken down into the respective variables which form part of their assessment.</p><p>It was observed that each documented method used different combinations of variables and many used completely different variables all together. From this information grew the realisation that if a variable is important and valid, surely it should be used in every determination of setting safety priorities.</p><p>The variables necessary to form a methodical assessment of safety priority were found to fall into two broad categories, these being: — Risk Assessment Variables — Priority Modification Variables</p><p>A model was then developed to incorporate the necessary variables for a complete assessment of safety priority.</p><p>A number of Melbourne based companies and institutions have been using the system since 1985 as part of their participatory decision making process. None have detailed any financial advantages of using the system, however, many organisations have reported a drop in disputation in relation to setting safety priorities and have also reported a greater acceptance of the final priority list.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 31-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90063-2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0376634990900632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper examines the current practices employed in many parts of the world for managing risks and setting safety priorities and outlines the development of a model which will satisfy both the technical and sociological requirements for determining valid safety priorities.

Various methods used for setting safety priorities were examined and broken down into the respective variables which form part of their assessment.

It was observed that each documented method used different combinations of variables and many used completely different variables all together. From this information grew the realisation that if a variable is important and valid, surely it should be used in every determination of setting safety priorities.

The variables necessary to form a methodical assessment of safety priority were found to fall into two broad categories, these being: — Risk Assessment Variables — Priority Modification Variables

A model was then developed to incorporate the necessary variables for a complete assessment of safety priority.

A number of Melbourne based companies and institutions have been using the system since 1985 as part of their participatory decision making process. None have detailed any financial advantages of using the system, however, many organisations have reported a drop in disputation in relation to setting safety priorities and have also reported a greater acceptance of the final priority list.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设置安全优先级
本文考察了世界上许多地方目前用于管理风险和设定安全优先级的做法,并概述了一种模型的发展,该模型将满足确定有效安全优先级的技术和社会学要求。审查了用于确定安全优先事项的各种方法,并将其分解为各自的变量,这些变量构成其评估的一部分。我们观察到,每种记录在案的方法使用了不同的变量组合,许多方法同时使用了完全不同的变量。从这些信息中,我们逐渐认识到,如果一个变量是重要和有效的,那么它当然应该被用于确定安全优先级。形成系统的安全优先级评估所需的变量被发现分为两大类,它们是:-风险评估变量-优先级修改变量然后开发了一个模型,以纳入完整的安全优先级评估所需的变量。自1985年以来,墨尔本的一些公司和机构一直在使用该系统作为其参与性决策过程的一部分。没有人详细说明使用该系统的任何财务优势,然而,许多组织报告说,与设置安全优先级有关的争议减少了,并且还报告说,最终优先级列表的接受程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The physiology of work Physical ergonomics job design: an accident prevention approach to control upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in manufacturing industry An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1