CANDIDA ALBICANS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS CO-INFECTION IN MICE AFTER ANTIBIOTIC-INDUCED DYSBIOSIS

S. A. Muradova, S. Gurbanova, Suruya Hadjieva, Mehman Aliyev
{"title":"CANDIDA ALBICANS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS CO-INFECTION IN MICE AFTER ANTIBIOTIC-INDUCED DYSBIOSIS","authors":"S. A. Muradova, S. Gurbanova, Suruya Hadjieva, Mehman Aliyev","doi":"10.26565/2313-6693-2018-36-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microbial interactions in Staphylococcus aureus–Candida albicans dual-species biofilms is a relevant research topic given the significant contribution of these microorganisms to hospital-acquired infections. Therefore, the purpose of our investigation was to study the interaction of opportunistic C. albicans and S. aureus in vivo and in vitro, both with the participation of normal microflora and in mice with antibacterial dysbiosis. The study of mentioned interactions was carried out on 100 white male mice weighing approximately 18 grams in vivo and using smears prepared from the grown mixed cultures of C. albicans and S. aureus and the Japan JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope for the purpose of electron microscopic study of microorganisms in vitro. Healthy mice forming control groups and mice with antibiotic-induced dysbiosis (after introduction of vancomycin, gentamicin, ampicillin) were divided into groups to create a mono- and associative infection: Ι group was given 1×107 CFU of C. albicans, II group – 1×108 CFU of S. aureus, and III group – a mixture of specified concentrations of C. albicans and S. aureus in the same proportion. Microorganisms causing monoinfection were being isolated from the body of animals treated with antibiotics till the end of the experiments in large quantities unlike in case of the healthy mice. Co-inoculation of these microbes in the same dose to animals (co-infection), which were injected with antibiotics, turned out to be fatal for them, whereas an adhesive bond was seen between the cells of C. albicans vs. S. aureus in vitro. As can be seen, such bacterial-fungal co-infection reduce substantially the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy and the likelihood of successful treatment and can not be ignored when choosing the appropriate treatment","PeriodicalId":31685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Medicine","volume":"67 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2313-6693-2018-36-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbial interactions in Staphylococcus aureus–Candida albicans dual-species biofilms is a relevant research topic given the significant contribution of these microorganisms to hospital-acquired infections. Therefore, the purpose of our investigation was to study the interaction of opportunistic C. albicans and S. aureus in vivo and in vitro, both with the participation of normal microflora and in mice with antibacterial dysbiosis. The study of mentioned interactions was carried out on 100 white male mice weighing approximately 18 grams in vivo and using smears prepared from the grown mixed cultures of C. albicans and S. aureus and the Japan JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope for the purpose of electron microscopic study of microorganisms in vitro. Healthy mice forming control groups and mice with antibiotic-induced dysbiosis (after introduction of vancomycin, gentamicin, ampicillin) were divided into groups to create a mono- and associative infection: Ι group was given 1×107 CFU of C. albicans, II group – 1×108 CFU of S. aureus, and III group – a mixture of specified concentrations of C. albicans and S. aureus in the same proportion. Microorganisms causing monoinfection were being isolated from the body of animals treated with antibiotics till the end of the experiments in large quantities unlike in case of the healthy mice. Co-inoculation of these microbes in the same dose to animals (co-infection), which were injected with antibiotics, turned out to be fatal for them, whereas an adhesive bond was seen between the cells of C. albicans vs. S. aureus in vitro. As can be seen, such bacterial-fungal co-infection reduce substantially the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy and the likelihood of successful treatment and can not be ignored when choosing the appropriate treatment
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素诱导的生态失调后小鼠白色念珠菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的共同感染
鉴于这些微生物对医院获得性感染的重要贡献,金黄色葡萄球菌-白色念珠菌双物种生物膜中的微生物相互作用是一个相关的研究课题。因此,我们的研究目的是研究机会性白色念珠菌和金黄色葡萄球菌在体内和体外,在正常菌群和抗菌生态失调小鼠的参与下的相互作用。上述相互作用的研究是在100只体重约为18克的白种雄性小鼠体内进行的,使用白色念珠菌和金黄色葡萄球菌混合培养物制备的涂片和日本JEM 1400透射电子显微镜进行体外微生物的电镜研究。形成对照组的健康小鼠和抗生素引起的生态失调小鼠(在引入万古霉素、庆大霉素、氨苄西林后)被分成组,以产生单一和联合感染:Ι组给予1×107白色念珠菌CFU, II组- 1×108金黄色葡萄球菌CFU, III组-规定浓度的白色念珠菌和金黄色葡萄球菌按相同比例混合。与健康小鼠不同的是,在使用抗生素治疗的动物体内大量分离出引起单感染的微生物,直到实验结束。将这些微生物以相同剂量共同接种给动物(共感染),并注射抗生素,结果对它们是致命的,而在体外,白色念珠菌与金黄色葡萄球菌的细胞之间存在粘附性结合。可以看出,这种细菌-真菌合并感染大大降低了抗生素治疗的有效性和治疗成功的可能性,在选择适当的治疗方法时不可忽视
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of the course acute thromboembolism of the pulmonary artery in women Influence of microbial colonization of the endometry on its function and development of hyperproliferative conditions Features of short-term variability of arterial pressure with different types of circadian rhythm in patients with hypertension disease who have suffered myocardial infarction Expression of cytokeratin and vimentin in villi of the chorion with anteintranatal fetal death on the background of complicated pregnancy Masticatory myofascial pain syndrome provoked by SARS-COV-2 infection in a patient with orofacial pathology (clinical case)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1