Hybrid approach to treatment of atrial fibrillation

C. Ong, T. Kofidis
{"title":"Hybrid approach to treatment of atrial fibrillation","authors":"C. Ong, T. Kofidis","doi":"10.1002/cce2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. For years, there has been much interest and much is written with regard to the integrated or hybrid multidisciplinary approach toward cardiovascular care. The hybrid approach has been established in many centers, mostly with respect to ischemic heart disease. However, it is only a new and upcoming trend toward the use of a hybrid approach to treating cardiac arrhythmias. This hybrid approach to treating AF, while not the prevalent practice, is supported by medical literature. This review article examines the hybrid approach to treatment of AF, its benefits, disadvantages, and safety, as well as the long‐term results, based on current available literature. The hybrid approach to treatment of AF, combining surgical epicardial, and catheter endocardial ablation, showed a higher success rate compared to either technique alone. The increasing cooperation and professional intimacy between cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons are likely to continue and the hybrid approach, with its benefits while bearing in mind its limitations, may become the gold standard for treatment of drug‐resistant AF for the coming decade and beyond.","PeriodicalId":100331,"journal":{"name":"Continuing Cardiology Education","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuing Cardiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cce2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. For years, there has been much interest and much is written with regard to the integrated or hybrid multidisciplinary approach toward cardiovascular care. The hybrid approach has been established in many centers, mostly with respect to ischemic heart disease. However, it is only a new and upcoming trend toward the use of a hybrid approach to treating cardiac arrhythmias. This hybrid approach to treating AF, while not the prevalent practice, is supported by medical literature. This review article examines the hybrid approach to treatment of AF, its benefits, disadvantages, and safety, as well as the long‐term results, based on current available literature. The hybrid approach to treatment of AF, combining surgical epicardial, and catheter endocardial ablation, showed a higher success rate compared to either technique alone. The increasing cooperation and professional intimacy between cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons are likely to continue and the hybrid approach, with its benefits while bearing in mind its limitations, may become the gold standard for treatment of drug‐resistant AF for the coming decade and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合方法治疗心房颤动
心房颤动(AF)是临床上最常见的持续性心律失常。多年来,人们对心血管护理的综合或混合多学科方法很感兴趣,也写了很多文章。混合方法已在许多中心建立,主要是关于缺血性心脏病。然而,使用混合方法治疗心律失常只是一个新的和即将到来的趋势。这种混合方法治疗房颤,虽然不是普遍的做法,是支持的医学文献。这篇综述文章根据现有文献,探讨了治疗房颤的混合方法,其优点、缺点和安全性,以及长期结果。治疗房颤的混合方法,结合心外膜手术和心内膜导管消融,与单独使用任何一种技术相比,成功率更高。心脏病专家和心胸外科医生之间日益密切的合作和专业亲密关系可能会继续下去,混合方法在考虑其局限性的同时也有其好处,可能成为未来十年乃至更长时间内治疗耐药房颤的金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Myocardial perfusion SPECT and SPECT/CT in interventional cardiology Abdominal aortic aneurysm: screening and management Pulmonary arterial hypertension in congenital heart disease Current knowledge on very late stent thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1