Effect of Smoking in Cognition among Male Medical Students

Karishma Rajbh, P. ari, Ey, P. DipeshRaj, Ay, N. Sapkota, Anish Dhami, Akshay Sarraf, eep Shrestha, D. Kc
{"title":"Effect of Smoking in Cognition among Male Medical Students","authors":"Karishma Rajbh, P. ari, Ey, P. DipeshRaj, Ay, N. Sapkota, Anish Dhami, Akshay Sarraf, eep Shrestha, D. Kc","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Smokers claim that smoking increases their concentration, alertness, and overall mental performance. On the contrary, evidences point at gradual cognitive deterioration in smokers. Cognitive deterioration can be assessed by Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Objective: To compare the cognitive status in smoker and non-smoker medical students. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was done in 46 male medical students with normal cardiac and pulmonary functions (23 smokers and 23 non-smokers, FTND was used to establish smoking status) at Pulmonary Function Lab in the Department of Basic and Clinical Physiology, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were measured to exclude pulmonary function defect. Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP) was used to ascertain subjects with normal and abnormal cardiac function. For cognition assessment Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), which is a close ended questionnaire, was used. Data were expressed in median and Inter-Quartile-Range (IQR). Chi-square Test was applied to observe association between smoking and cognition (normal vs. impaired cognition). Results: All baseline variables viz., anthropometric (Age and BMI), cardiovascular (Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressures) and pulmonary function (VC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC) were comparable between smokers and nonsmokers except age. Greater percentage of smokers compared to non-smokers (48% vs. 22%) had mild cognitive decline as measured by MoCA score. However, the finding was statistically non-significant (0.063). Conclusion: Low nicotine-dependent male medical students with normal pulmonary and cardiac functions, showed mild but insignificant cognitive decline as measured by MoCA score.","PeriodicalId":14828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Smokers claim that smoking increases their concentration, alertness, and overall mental performance. On the contrary, evidences point at gradual cognitive deterioration in smokers. Cognitive deterioration can be assessed by Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Objective: To compare the cognitive status in smoker and non-smoker medical students. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was done in 46 male medical students with normal cardiac and pulmonary functions (23 smokers and 23 non-smokers, FTND was used to establish smoking status) at Pulmonary Function Lab in the Department of Basic and Clinical Physiology, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were measured to exclude pulmonary function defect. Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP) was used to ascertain subjects with normal and abnormal cardiac function. For cognition assessment Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), which is a close ended questionnaire, was used. Data were expressed in median and Inter-Quartile-Range (IQR). Chi-square Test was applied to observe association between smoking and cognition (normal vs. impaired cognition). Results: All baseline variables viz., anthropometric (Age and BMI), cardiovascular (Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressures) and pulmonary function (VC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC) were comparable between smokers and nonsmokers except age. Greater percentage of smokers compared to non-smokers (48% vs. 22%) had mild cognitive decline as measured by MoCA score. However, the finding was statistically non-significant (0.063). Conclusion: Low nicotine-dependent male medical students with normal pulmonary and cardiac functions, showed mild but insignificant cognitive decline as measured by MoCA score.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸烟对男医学生认知的影响
简介:吸烟者声称吸烟能提高他们的注意力、警觉性和整体精神表现。相反,有证据表明吸烟者的认知能力会逐渐退化。认知退化可采用蒙特利尔认知评估法(MoCA)进行评估。目的:比较吸烟与不吸烟医学生的认知状况。材料与方法:对柯伊拉腊BP健康科学研究所基础与临床生理学系肺功能实验室46名心肺功能正常的男医学生(吸烟者23名,非吸烟者23名,吸烟情况用FTND确定)进行横断面对比研究。测定肺功能试验(PFT)以排除肺功能缺损。用血压(收缩压和舒张压)确定受试者心功能正常和异常。认知评估采用封闭式问卷——蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)。数据以中位数和四分位间距(IQR)表示。采用卡方检验观察吸烟与认知(正常与认知受损)之间的关系。结果:除年龄外,所有基线变量,即人体测量(年龄和BMI)、心血管(舒张压和收缩压)和肺功能(VC、FEV1和FEV1/FVC)在吸烟者和非吸烟者之间具有可比性。MoCA评分显示,吸烟者比不吸烟者(48%比22%)有轻度认知能力下降的比例更高。然而,这一发现在统计学上无显著性(0.063)。结论:低尼古丁依赖男医学生肺功能和心功能正常,MoCA评分显示轻度但不显著的认知能力下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Internet Addiction and its Relationship with Attachment Styles Among Tunisian Medical Students Patient’s perception of the benefits of long-term opioids: Reinforcement associated with short-term effects Cognitive behavioral therapy treatment for drug addiction ‘Life-Changing Bubbles’ – How carbonated water can relieve swallowing problems for many dysphagia sufferers worldwide Ecology of vital activity as an element of antistress therapy on the example of the organization of the work of a medical center with industrial enterprises under the VMI program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1