COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF GLOBAL CARBON EMISSIONS

K. Vories
{"title":"COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF GLOBAL CARBON EMISSIONS","authors":"K. Vories","doi":"10.21000/JASMR14020064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On April 13, 2012 and January 8, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) proposed new regulations that amounted to a prohibition on the Best Technologies Currently Available for constructing new coal fired power plants. USEPA first proposed in 2012, that new coal power plants must not produce more carbon dioxide (CO2) than a natural gas power plant. Then in 2014, it revised the standard to require that unless a coal fired power plant met the same CO2 emission levels as achievable with power plants utilizing Integrated Gas Combined Cycle (IGCC) combustion technology and in addition provide permanent sequestion of at least 25% of the CO produced, it could not be built. This effectively changes the proposed standard from 454 to 499 grams/kilowatt-hour of CO2 emissions in order to construct a new coal fired power plant. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), however has calculated the construction cost for such technology at $6,599/kW which is signifcantly more costly that the construction of a nuclear power plant at $5,530/kW and not remotely affordable compared to a natural gas power plant at $971/kW. This prohibition, like the historic prohibition of alcohol, is more likely to have negative rather than positive consequences. This paper focuses on facts concerning fossil fuel utilization and its impacts upon global climate, the global economy, and the world population. It contrasts the impacts of current popular notions in the media and the regulations that govern our nation, that fossil fuels are an evil that must be stopped, versus the utilization of common sense to assess how to best use and advance currently available science and technology. It highlights best available control technology (BACT) that could reduce the man made contribution of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in a way that does not bankrupt the global economy and jeopardize the global population. It will assess the growth of renewable energy and project the number of generations that would be required to have them replace fossil fuel as an energy source. 2015 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference in Nasvhille, TN May 5-7, 2015 http://www.flyash.info/","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"13 1","pages":"64-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR14020064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On April 13, 2012 and January 8, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) proposed new regulations that amounted to a prohibition on the Best Technologies Currently Available for constructing new coal fired power plants. USEPA first proposed in 2012, that new coal power plants must not produce more carbon dioxide (CO2) than a natural gas power plant. Then in 2014, it revised the standard to require that unless a coal fired power plant met the same CO2 emission levels as achievable with power plants utilizing Integrated Gas Combined Cycle (IGCC) combustion technology and in addition provide permanent sequestion of at least 25% of the CO produced, it could not be built. This effectively changes the proposed standard from 454 to 499 grams/kilowatt-hour of CO2 emissions in order to construct a new coal fired power plant. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), however has calculated the construction cost for such technology at $6,599/kW which is signifcantly more costly that the construction of a nuclear power plant at $5,530/kW and not remotely affordable compared to a natural gas power plant at $971/kW. This prohibition, like the historic prohibition of alcohol, is more likely to have negative rather than positive consequences. This paper focuses on facts concerning fossil fuel utilization and its impacts upon global climate, the global economy, and the world population. It contrasts the impacts of current popular notions in the media and the regulations that govern our nation, that fossil fuels are an evil that must be stopped, versus the utilization of common sense to assess how to best use and advance currently available science and technology. It highlights best available control technology (BACT) that could reduce the man made contribution of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in a way that does not bankrupt the global economy and jeopardize the global population. It will assess the growth of renewable energy and project the number of generations that would be required to have them replace fossil fuel as an energy source. 2015 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference in Nasvhille, TN May 5-7, 2015 http://www.flyash.info/
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理全球碳排放的常识性解决方案
2012年4月13日和2014年1月8日,美国环境保护署(USEPA)提出了新的法规,相当于禁止使用目前可用于建设新燃煤电厂的最佳技术。美国环保署于2012年首次提出,新建燃煤电厂的二氧化碳排放量不得超过天然气电厂。然后在2014年,它修订了标准,要求除非燃煤电厂达到与使用综合气体联合循环(IGCC)燃烧技术的发电厂相同的二氧化碳排放水平,并且提供至少25%的二氧化碳排放的永久性问题,否则不能建造。这有效地改变了拟议的标准,从454克/千瓦时二氧化碳排放到499克/千瓦时,以建设一个新的燃煤电厂。然而,根据美国能源信息署(EIA)的计算,这种技术的建设成本为6599美元/千瓦,远远高于5530美元/千瓦的核电站的建设成本,与971美元/千瓦的天然气发电厂相比,这是遥不可及的。这一禁令,就像历史上的禁酒令一样,更有可能产生消极而非积极的后果。本文的重点是关于化石燃料的利用及其对全球气候、全球经济和世界人口的影响的事实。它对比了当前媒体的流行观念和管理我们国家的法规的影响,即化石燃料是必须停止的邪恶,与利用常识来评估如何最好地利用和推进现有的科学和技术。它强调了现有的最佳控制技术(BACT),这种技术可以在不使全球经济破产和危及全球人口的情况下减少人为对大气中二氧化碳的贡献。它将评估可再生能源的增长,并预测需要多少代人来取代化石燃料作为能源来源。2015年世界煤灰(WOCA)会议在纳什维尔,田纳西州2015年5月5日至7日http://www.flyash.info/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System to Evaluate Prime Farmland Reclamation Success Based on Spatial Soil Properties PENNSYLVANIA’S ABANDONED MINE LAND (AML) EMERGENCY PROGRAM THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEEPAGE ANALYSIS OF A COAL REFUSE PILE RECLAMATION PENNSYLVANIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL GOOD SAMARITAN PROGRAM DIMENSIONS IN POST-INDUSTRIAL LAND TRANSFORMATION IN PLANNING AND DESIGN: A PORTUGESE CASE STUDY CONCERNING PUBLIC PERCEPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1