Optimal Dosing of Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Innovations in Pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v14i1.5174
Aliya Abdulla, Caitlin M Williams, Trisha N Branan, Susan E Smith
{"title":"Optimal Dosing of Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.","authors":"Aliya Abdulla, Caitlin M Williams, Trisha N Branan, Susan E Smith","doi":"10.24926/iip.v14i1.5174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Evidence suggests that goal anti-Xa levels are achieved in only 33% of critically ill patients receiving standard prophylactic enoxaparin dosing. There has been limited focus on the potential suboptimal anticoagulation effect on medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients receiving therapeutic enoxaparin dosing for venous thromboembolism (VTE). <b>Methods:</b> MICU patients receiving enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily or 1.5 mg/kg daily for VTE treatment in a 350-bed community teaching hospital between 2013 and 2019 with at least one peak anti-Xa level measured were included. The primary outcome was the proportion who achieved therapeutic anti-Xa levels with standard dosing. Secondary outcomes included types of dose-adjustments required and the proportion requiring subsequent dose-adjustments. Descriptive statistics were presented for all outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Fifty-three patients were evaluated, including those receiving either twice-daily or once-daily standard therapeutic dosing. Optimal anti-Xa levels at first measurement were recorded after the initiation of enoxaparin in 26.4% (n=14) patients. Dose adjustments were required in 70.7% (n=29) of patients receiving twice-daily dosing and in 83.3% (n=10) receiving once-daily dosing (P=0.97) to appropriately increase or decrease the enoxaparin dose. By the third anti-Xa level measurement, 3 patients remained outside of the therapeutic range. <b>Conclusions:</b> Standard therapeutic enoxaparin dosing did not result in optimal anti-Xa levels for a majority of MICU patients regardless of dosing regimen used or patient specific factors. Future studies should identify patient factors associated with the requirement for higher or lower enoxaparin dosing.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v14i1.5174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that goal anti-Xa levels are achieved in only 33% of critically ill patients receiving standard prophylactic enoxaparin dosing. There has been limited focus on the potential suboptimal anticoagulation effect on medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients receiving therapeutic enoxaparin dosing for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: MICU patients receiving enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily or 1.5 mg/kg daily for VTE treatment in a 350-bed community teaching hospital between 2013 and 2019 with at least one peak anti-Xa level measured were included. The primary outcome was the proportion who achieved therapeutic anti-Xa levels with standard dosing. Secondary outcomes included types of dose-adjustments required and the proportion requiring subsequent dose-adjustments. Descriptive statistics were presented for all outcomes. Results: Fifty-three patients were evaluated, including those receiving either twice-daily or once-daily standard therapeutic dosing. Optimal anti-Xa levels at first measurement were recorded after the initiation of enoxaparin in 26.4% (n=14) patients. Dose adjustments were required in 70.7% (n=29) of patients receiving twice-daily dosing and in 83.3% (n=10) receiving once-daily dosing (P=0.97) to appropriately increase or decrease the enoxaparin dose. By the third anti-Xa level measurement, 3 patients remained outside of the therapeutic range. Conclusions: Standard therapeutic enoxaparin dosing did not result in optimal anti-Xa levels for a majority of MICU patients regardless of dosing regimen used or patient specific factors. Future studies should identify patient factors associated with the requirement for higher or lower enoxaparin dosing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉血栓栓塞危重患者依诺肝素的最佳剂量。
背景:有证据表明,在接受标准预防性依诺肝素治疗的危重患者中,只有33%的患者达到了抗xa水平的目标。对于接受依诺肝素治疗治疗静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的医学重症监护病房(MICU)患者潜在的次优抗凝效果的关注有限。方法:纳入2013 - 2019年在某350个床位的社区教学医院接受依诺肝素1mg /kg每日2次或1.5 mg/kg每日2次静脉血栓栓塞治疗的MICU患者,且至少检测到1次抗xa峰值水平。主要终点是在标准剂量下达到治疗性抗xa水平的比例。次要结局包括所需剂量调整的类型和需要后续剂量调整的比例。对所有结果进行描述性统计。结果:对53例患者进行了评估,包括接受每日两次或每日一次标准治疗剂量的患者。26.4% (n=14)患者在开始使用依诺肝素后首次测量时的抗xa水平达到最佳。70.7% (n=29)接受每日两次给药的患者需要调整剂量,83.3% (n=10)接受每日一次给药的患者(P=0.97)需要适当增加或减少依诺肝素剂量。第三次测定抗xa水平时,3例患者仍在治疗范围外。结论:对于大多数MICU患者,无论使用何种给药方案或患者特异性因素,标准的治疗性依诺肝素剂量都不能产生最佳的抗xa水平。未来的研究应确定与依诺肝素较高或较低剂量需求相关的患者因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Pharmacy Entrustable Professional Activities Strategies Proposed by Students and Pharmacists for Virtual Experiential Patient Care Practicums In-class Exercises Regarding the Roles of Excipients in a Pharmaceutics Course The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Treating Patients with Escherichia coli Bacteremia in a Small Single Center Community Hospital Development and Pilot Testing of the OTC Coach Software to Support Student Pharmacist Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1