{"title":"Tivoli – Negotiating Directory Society in the Public Pleasure Garden 1797-1798","authors":"Ane Cornelia Pade","doi":"10.21825/documenta.81884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the 1797-1798 public debate surrounding the Tivoli Garden, Paris. The paper explores and analyses how opposing publications in the Parisian press utilised the garden as a locus to negotiate abstract societal changes following the revolution, including women’s access to the public sphere, class identities, and consumer culture. In doing so, this paper shows how the ideas of Rousseau, particularly those presented in La nouvelle Héloïse (1761), influenced public debate over the pleasure garden, and thus adds a new chapter to the study of Rousseau’s influence on the arts. Furthermore, this paper examines the popularity of the Tivoli garden, from the perspective of the Parisian public following the Terror. This paper proposes that the highly theatrical public pleasure garden functioned as a designated testing ground for transgressive social behavior. This allowed for the rules and norms of society to be developed, tested and learned following the French Revolution. By presenting the public pleasure garden as a significant space in the societal development of post-revolutionary society, this paper presents an entirely new perspective on Parisian public pleasure gardens. Keywords: Tivoli, Rousseau, Directory, Journal des dames et des modes, Theatricality ","PeriodicalId":42888,"journal":{"name":"Studia et Documenta","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia et Documenta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/documenta.81884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines the 1797-1798 public debate surrounding the Tivoli Garden, Paris. The paper explores and analyses how opposing publications in the Parisian press utilised the garden as a locus to negotiate abstract societal changes following the revolution, including women’s access to the public sphere, class identities, and consumer culture. In doing so, this paper shows how the ideas of Rousseau, particularly those presented in La nouvelle Héloïse (1761), influenced public debate over the pleasure garden, and thus adds a new chapter to the study of Rousseau’s influence on the arts. Furthermore, this paper examines the popularity of the Tivoli garden, from the perspective of the Parisian public following the Terror. This paper proposes that the highly theatrical public pleasure garden functioned as a designated testing ground for transgressive social behavior. This allowed for the rules and norms of society to be developed, tested and learned following the French Revolution. By presenting the public pleasure garden as a significant space in the societal development of post-revolutionary society, this paper presents an entirely new perspective on Parisian public pleasure gardens. Keywords: Tivoli, Rousseau, Directory, Journal des dames et des modes, Theatricality
本文考察了1797-1798年围绕巴黎蒂沃利花园的公开辩论。本文探讨和分析了巴黎新闻界的对立出版物如何利用花园作为谈判革命后抽象社会变化的场所,包括妇女进入公共领域,阶级身份和消费文化。在此过程中,本文展示了卢梭的思想,特别是那些在La nouvelle Héloïse(1761)中提出的思想,如何影响了公众对游乐花园的辩论,从而为卢梭对艺术的影响的研究增添了新的一章。此外,本文从恐怖事件后巴黎公众的角度考察了蒂沃利花园的受欢迎程度。本文提出,高度戏剧化的公共娱乐花园作为违规社会行为的指定试验场。这使得社会的规则和规范得以在法国大革命之后得到发展、检验和学习。通过将公共游艺园作为革命后社会发展的重要空间来呈现,本文对巴黎的公共游艺园提出了一个全新的视角。关键词:蒂沃利,卢梭,《目录》,《女神与模式》,戏剧性