Construct validity pedagogy competency instrument of teaching and learning practice program (TLPP) students: Unidimensional confirmatory factor analysis

IF 0.5 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.21833/ijaas.2018.08.004
L. Otaya, B. Kartowagiran, H. Retnawati
{"title":"Construct validity pedagogy competency instrument of teaching and learning practice program (TLPP) students: Unidimensional confirmatory factor analysis","authors":"L. Otaya, B. Kartowagiran, H. Retnawati","doi":"10.21833/ijaas.2018.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pedagogy competency instrument is a tool to measure the achievement of teacher candidate students’ ability of the teaching and learning practice program (TLPP). Various studies state the importance of this competency in supporting students in learning to use knowledge and action when teaching practices in the classroom. But there is a gap in the assessment because the instruments have not been able to measure this competency. Therefore, it is necessary to prove the validity of the construct to the items in the instrument. By looking to the concept, there are 4 dimensions which are used in composing the instrument such as effective classroom management, effective teaching practices, effective assessment, and technical skill. This study aimed to test that construct instrument validity. This study model used in design and development model. The data obtained from the experiment of teaching trial students were 177 persons observed by 67 teachers. Technic of data analysis to prove construct validity was first order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with the help of LISREL 8.70 software. The results showed that from all items which were 43, there was 1 item stated as invalid and 42 items were valid or unidimensional with T-Value on the loading factor value >1.96. This finding successfully proves that the unidimensional data parameter can measure the construct and give significant effects. It is expected that the finding of this research can complete the constructive knowledge of the items of pedagogical competency assessment of TLPP students and contribute to improving the quality of teaching into a good teacher in the present and future.","PeriodicalId":46663,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Pedagogy competency instrument is a tool to measure the achievement of teacher candidate students’ ability of the teaching and learning practice program (TLPP). Various studies state the importance of this competency in supporting students in learning to use knowledge and action when teaching practices in the classroom. But there is a gap in the assessment because the instruments have not been able to measure this competency. Therefore, it is necessary to prove the validity of the construct to the items in the instrument. By looking to the concept, there are 4 dimensions which are used in composing the instrument such as effective classroom management, effective teaching practices, effective assessment, and technical skill. This study aimed to test that construct instrument validity. This study model used in design and development model. The data obtained from the experiment of teaching trial students were 177 persons observed by 67 teachers. Technic of data analysis to prove construct validity was first order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with the help of LISREL 8.70 software. The results showed that from all items which were 43, there was 1 item stated as invalid and 42 items were valid or unidimensional with T-Value on the loading factor value >1.96. This finding successfully proves that the unidimensional data parameter can measure the construct and give significant effects. It is expected that the finding of this research can complete the constructive knowledge of the items of pedagogical competency assessment of TLPP students and contribute to improving the quality of teaching into a good teacher in the present and future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建构教与学实习计画学生效度教学法胜任力量表:一维验证性因子分析
教育学胜任力量表是衡量教师候选人在教学实践计划(TLPP)中的能力成就的工具。各种研究表明,在课堂教学实践中,这种能力在支持学生学习使用知识和行动方面的重要性。但是在评估中有一个缺口,因为这些工具还不能衡量这种能力。因此,有必要对文书中的项目证明构式的有效性。从概念上看,乐器的构成有四个维度,即有效的课堂管理、有效的教学实践、有效的评估和技术技能。本研究旨在检验建构工具的效度。本研究采用了设计开发模型。教学试生实验数据为177人,教师67人。数据分析验证结构效度的技术采用一级验证性因子分析(CFA),软件为lisrel8.70。结果表明,在43个条目中,无效条目1个,有效或单维条目42个,加载因子t值>1.96。这一发现成功地证明了一维数据参数可以测量结构,并具有显著的效果。期望本研究的发现能完善对TLPP学生教学能力评估项目的建构性认识,并有助于提高教学质量,成为一名优秀的教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
234
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the views of nurses and supervisors on leadership competencies for enhanced primary healthcare services Morphophonemic parser: A study of teachers and students Nurturing brilliance: A cross-cultural exploration of supporting gifted children The cascade effect: Are the U.S. economy and global stock markets vulnerable to the collapse of First Republic Bank? Evolution and future perspectives of scientific journals in Peruvian public universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1