[Vacuum-assisted glue obliteration of veins. Domestic technique of cyanoacrylate vein ablation].

A A Fokin, A I Nadvikov, A V Gasnikov, V V Chernousov, D A Khisamutdinov, A O Bryzgalov
{"title":"[Vacuum-assisted glue obliteration of veins. Domestic technique of cyanoacrylate vein ablation].","authors":"A A Fokin, A I Nadvikov, A V Gasnikov, V V Chernousov, D A Khisamutdinov, A O Bryzgalov","doi":"10.33029/1027-6661-2022-28-1-51-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess efficacy of a new method of cyanoacrylate obliteration of veins, analyzing immediate and remote results.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The primary endpoints were the pain intensity during surgery (as assessed by the visual analogue scale), occlusion of the vein and severity of the venous disease according to the Venous Clinical Severity Score at various terms. The results were analyzed during the first 10 days after manipulation and then after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. This study included 37 patients who from October 2018 underwent cyanoacrylate obliteration of veins according to a new technique on a total of 44 lower extremities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed 41 manipulations on the great saphenous vein (93.2%) and 3 on the small saphenous vein (6.8%). The diameter of the target vein ranged from 0.3 to 1.0 cm (mean 0.63 cm), with the length varying from 10 to 50 cm (mean 30.9 cm). We used from 0.2 to 1.6 ml (mean 0.76 ml) of glue composition 'Sulfacrylate'. The average pain level was 1.6 (minimum - 1, maximum 4) according to the visual analogue scale. In the early postoperative period, there were no serious complications. The most frequent complication of the early period was cyanoacrylate phlebitis having appeared on POD 3-4. During the first 10 days, complete occlusion was observed in 100 % of cases. The occlusion rate at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months amounted to 93.2%, 86%, 90.2% and 84.6%, respectively, with no clinical relapses observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The technique of vacuum-assisted glue obliteration of veins using Russian-made glue composition 'Sulfacrylate' proved safe and effective. Further studies are warranted for accumulation of experience and follow up of remote results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7821,"journal":{"name":"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33029/1027-6661-2022-28-1-51-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess efficacy of a new method of cyanoacrylate obliteration of veins, analyzing immediate and remote results.

Patients and methods: The primary endpoints were the pain intensity during surgery (as assessed by the visual analogue scale), occlusion of the vein and severity of the venous disease according to the Venous Clinical Severity Score at various terms. The results were analyzed during the first 10 days after manipulation and then after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. This study included 37 patients who from October 2018 underwent cyanoacrylate obliteration of veins according to a new technique on a total of 44 lower extremities.

Results: We performed 41 manipulations on the great saphenous vein (93.2%) and 3 on the small saphenous vein (6.8%). The diameter of the target vein ranged from 0.3 to 1.0 cm (mean 0.63 cm), with the length varying from 10 to 50 cm (mean 30.9 cm). We used from 0.2 to 1.6 ml (mean 0.76 ml) of glue composition 'Sulfacrylate'. The average pain level was 1.6 (minimum - 1, maximum 4) according to the visual analogue scale. In the early postoperative period, there were no serious complications. The most frequent complication of the early period was cyanoacrylate phlebitis having appeared on POD 3-4. During the first 10 days, complete occlusion was observed in 100 % of cases. The occlusion rate at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months amounted to 93.2%, 86%, 90.2% and 84.6%, respectively, with no clinical relapses observed.

Conclusion: The technique of vacuum-assisted glue obliteration of veins using Russian-made glue composition 'Sulfacrylate' proved safe and effective. Further studies are warranted for accumulation of experience and follow up of remote results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真空辅助胶合静脉闭塞。国产氰基丙烯酸酯静脉消融技术[j]。
目的:评价一种新的氰基丙烯酸酯静脉闭塞法的疗效,分析其近景和远期效果。患者和方法:主要终点是手术期间的疼痛强度(通过视觉模拟量表评估),静脉闭塞和静脉疾病的严重程度(根据静脉临床严重程度评分)。分别于手法后10天、1、3、6、12、24个月进行分析。这项研究包括37名患者,他们从2018年10月开始根据一种新技术对44条下肢进行了氰基丙烯酸酯静脉闭塞术。结果:大隐静脉手法41例(93.2%),小隐静脉手法3例(6.8%)。靶静脉直径0.3 ~ 1.0 cm(平均0.63 cm),长度10 ~ 50 cm(平均30.9 cm)。我们使用0.2至1.6 ml(平均0.76 ml)的“磺胺酸酯”胶水成分。根据视觉模拟评分,平均疼痛程度为1.6(最小- 1,最大4)。术后早期无严重并发症发生。早期最常见的并发症是出现在POD 3-4的氰基丙烯酸酯性静脉炎。在头10天,100%的病例完全咬合。1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月、24个月的咬合率分别为93.2%、86%、90.2%、84.6%,无临床复发。结论:采用俄罗斯研制的“磺胺酸酯”胶制剂进行静脉真空闭塞术安全有效。为了积累经验和跟踪远程结果,有必要进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Decision-making in thoracic aorta dilatation. State of the art Volumetric-myocardial indices for predicting the course of the early postoperative period in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy Emergency myocardial revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (literature review) Adverse events and complications following cyanoacrylate adhesive closure of varicose veins Clinical comparison of incidence of side effects of cilostazol analogs in treatment of diabetic foot syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1