Variations in landform definition: a quantitative assessment of differences between five maps of glacial cirques in the Ţarcu Mountains (Southern Carpathians, Romania)

F. Ardelean, L. Drăguţ, P. Urdea, Marcel F. Török-Oance
{"title":"Variations in landform definition: a quantitative assessment of differences between five maps of glacial cirques in the Ţarcu Mountains (Southern Carpathians, Romania)","authors":"F. Ardelean, L. Drăguţ, P. Urdea, Marcel F. Török-Oance","doi":"10.1111/AREA.12043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geomorphological mapping is an important tool in geomorphology and related disciplines, yet it depends on the expertise and experience of the practitioner. The reliability of the technique and its products has not been subject to sufficient quantitative evaluation. In this study, we evaluated the magnitudes of differences in mapping glacial cirques between five maps in a mountainous area in the Southern Carpathians in Romania and attempted to identify the causes of the differences observed and possible solutions for obtaining more objective geomorphological mapping. We found notable differences between maps (in paired sample comparisons in all cases for the total values in each dataset) in the number of cirques, the total area and in headwall crest lengths. Statistically significant differences were found between datasets based on different semantic models of glacial cirques. Differences in mapping arise mainly from differences in conceptualising glacial cirques. When mapping relied on an explicit semantic model (a geomorphometric approach), differences were significantly smaller. Therefore, explicit semantic models of landforms based on land surface variables can result in more similar maps and further facilitate the transition from manual delineation to automated recognition of landforms from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs).","PeriodicalId":72297,"journal":{"name":"Area (Oxford, England)","volume":"17 1","pages":"348-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/AREA.12043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Geomorphological mapping is an important tool in geomorphology and related disciplines, yet it depends on the expertise and experience of the practitioner. The reliability of the technique and its products has not been subject to sufficient quantitative evaluation. In this study, we evaluated the magnitudes of differences in mapping glacial cirques between five maps in a mountainous area in the Southern Carpathians in Romania and attempted to identify the causes of the differences observed and possible solutions for obtaining more objective geomorphological mapping. We found notable differences between maps (in paired sample comparisons in all cases for the total values in each dataset) in the number of cirques, the total area and in headwall crest lengths. Statistically significant differences were found between datasets based on different semantic models of glacial cirques. Differences in mapping arise mainly from differences in conceptualising glacial cirques. When mapping relied on an explicit semantic model (a geomorphometric approach), differences were significantly smaller. Therefore, explicit semantic models of landforms based on land surface variables can result in more similar maps and further facilitate the transition from manual delineation to automated recognition of landforms from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地貌定义的变化:对Ţarcu山脉(南喀尔巴阡山脉,罗马尼亚)五幅冰川旋转图之间差异的定量评估
地貌测绘是地貌学和相关学科的重要工具,但它依赖于实践者的专业知识和经验。该技术及其产品的可靠性尚未得到充分的定量评价。在这项研究中,我们评估了罗马尼亚喀尔巴阡山脉南部一个山区的五幅地图在绘制冰川旋转图时的差异程度,并试图确定所观察到的差异的原因和可能的解决方案,以获得更客观的地貌制图。我们发现地图之间的显著差异(在所有情况下的成对样本比较中,每个数据集中的总价值)在圆环的数量、总面积和顶壁波峰长度上。基于不同语义模型的数据集之间存在统计学差异。制图上的差异主要是由于对冰川旋流概念的不同。当映射依赖于显式语义模型(一种地貌学方法)时,差异明显较小。因此,基于地表变量的显式地貌语义模型可以产生更多相似的地图,并进一步促进从人工圈定到数字高程模型(dem)地貌自动识别的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Value Capture by Companies of Different Ownership, Tier, Size, and Distance to Market: A Cross‐Sectoral Analysis “A canary is supposed to sit in a cage and look at someone else’s happiness”: Domestic rewilding in fin‐de‐siècle st. petersburg Rewilding: An emotional nature Towards a critical geopolitics of China‐US rivalry: Pericentricity, Regional Conflicts and Transnational Connections Cities of neurodiversity: New directions for an urban geography of neurodiversity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1