Relational strategies to connect technology and design: technology brokering and mediating

C. Dell’Era, R. Verganti
{"title":"Relational strategies to connect technology and design: technology brokering and mediating","authors":"C. Dell’Era, R. Verganti","doi":"10.1504/IJTIP.2013.052618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The open innovation paradigm represents one of the most debated topics in technology and innovation management research in the last decade. Concurrently, different modes of collaboration involve different strategic trade-offs. Scholars operating in the technology management field have investigated the distinction between brokers who provide knowledge and mediators who provide contacts with other actors. While the former exploit their network position to connect separated worlds, the latter introduce disconnected organisations and facilitate their coordination. This paper explores the differences between technology brokers and mediators to provide guidelines that can orient managers to identify the appropriate bridge strategy towards radical innovation. Specifically, this paper leverages the rich literature about brokers. From an empirical point of view, the research relies on a multiple case study that focuses on two collaborative projects undertaken by Material ConneXion with BMW and PUMA.","PeriodicalId":52540,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning","volume":"3 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2013.052618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The open innovation paradigm represents one of the most debated topics in technology and innovation management research in the last decade. Concurrently, different modes of collaboration involve different strategic trade-offs. Scholars operating in the technology management field have investigated the distinction between brokers who provide knowledge and mediators who provide contacts with other actors. While the former exploit their network position to connect separated worlds, the latter introduce disconnected organisations and facilitate their coordination. This paper explores the differences between technology brokers and mediators to provide guidelines that can orient managers to identify the appropriate bridge strategy towards radical innovation. Specifically, this paper leverages the rich literature about brokers. From an empirical point of view, the research relies on a multiple case study that focuses on two collaborative projects undertaken by Material ConneXion with BMW and PUMA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接技术与设计的关系策略:技术中介与中介
在过去十年中,开放式创新范式是技术和创新管理研究中最具争议的话题之一。同时,不同的协作模式涉及不同的战略权衡。从事技术管理领域的学者研究了提供知识的经纪人和提供与其他行动者联系的调解人之间的区别。前者利用自己的网络地位来连接分离的世界,后者则引入了分离的组织,促进了它们之间的协调。本文探讨了技术经纪人和中介之间的差异,以提供指导方针,可以引导管理者确定适当的过渡战略,以实现激进的创新。具体而言,本文利用了丰富的关于经纪人的文献。从实证的角度来看,该研究依赖于多个案例研究,重点关注Material ConneXion与宝马和PUMA开展的两个合作项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning
International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The IJTIP is a refereed journal that provides an authoritative source of information in the field of technology intelligence, technology planning, R&D resource allocation, technology controlling, technology decision-making processes and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
All for one, or one out of many An analysis of cryptocurrency returns and technological differentiation An introduction to the new challenges and promise of I-4.0 based commercialisation in the COVID-19-induced 'low-touch economy' ecosystem Innovation research knowledge accumulation in leading actors: a bibliometric analysis approach Innovation research knowledge accumulation in leading actors: A bibliometric analysis approach Artificial Intelligence in Project Management: Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1