Not for everyone: intra-organisational divides and the stratification of access to work–life policies

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Community Work & Family Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI:10.1080/13668803.2015.1089840
A. Ollier-Malaterre, C. Andrade
{"title":"Not for everyone: intra-organisational divides and the stratification of access to work–life policies","authors":"A. Ollier-Malaterre, C. Andrade","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2015.1089840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prior research documented a number of factors pertaining to employees or to organisational cultures that can prevent employees from accessing employer-driven work–life policies (WLP). Our study focuses on factors originating in the jobs themselves. We conducted 98 in-depth employee interviews in two multinational companies based in Europe and led feedback sessions with human resources executives. Three mechanisms explained the observed stratification of access to WLP across jobs: (1) the intra-organisational digital divide prevented ‘less digital’ employees from collecting information about WLP on the intranet and thus impaired awareness of the policies; (2) the divide in worksite size prevented employees on smaller worksites from accessing childcare centres, sports or health facilities and (3) the divide in job types restricted access to WLP for specific occupations. The stratification of access to WLP was not strategically driven by human resources; rather the divides were largely unintentional. Our study uncovers inequalities of access originating in the jobs themselves and provides a theoretical integration of the various sets of factors that may promote or hinder employee awareness of WLP. Our findings suggest that organisations should strive to identify these inequalities and to provide ways to cope for these, for instance by offering other forms of support.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":"167 1","pages":"519 - 537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Work & Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1089840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Prior research documented a number of factors pertaining to employees or to organisational cultures that can prevent employees from accessing employer-driven work–life policies (WLP). Our study focuses on factors originating in the jobs themselves. We conducted 98 in-depth employee interviews in two multinational companies based in Europe and led feedback sessions with human resources executives. Three mechanisms explained the observed stratification of access to WLP across jobs: (1) the intra-organisational digital divide prevented ‘less digital’ employees from collecting information about WLP on the intranet and thus impaired awareness of the policies; (2) the divide in worksite size prevented employees on smaller worksites from accessing childcare centres, sports or health facilities and (3) the divide in job types restricted access to WLP for specific occupations. The stratification of access to WLP was not strategically driven by human resources; rather the divides were largely unintentional. Our study uncovers inequalities of access originating in the jobs themselves and provides a theoretical integration of the various sets of factors that may promote or hinder employee awareness of WLP. Our findings suggest that organisations should strive to identify these inequalities and to provide ways to cope for these, for instance by offering other forms of support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并非所有人都适用:组织内部的分歧,以及工作与生活政策的分层
先前的研究记录了许多与员工或组织文化有关的因素,这些因素可能会阻止员工获得雇主驱动的工作生活政策(WLP)。我们的研究侧重于工作本身的因素。我们在欧洲的两家跨国公司进行了98次深入的员工访谈,并与人力资源主管进行了反馈会议。三种机制解释了不同工作岗位对WLP访问的分层现象:(1)组织内部的数字鸿沟阻止了“数字化程度较低”的员工在内部网上收集有关WLP的信息,从而削弱了对政策的认识;(2)工作场所大小的差异阻碍了较小工作场所的雇员使用托儿中心、体育或保健设施;(3)工作类型的差异限制了特定职业使用WLP的机会。获取WLP的分层不是由人力资源战略驱动的;相反,这些分歧在很大程度上是无意的。我们的研究揭示了源于工作本身的不平等,并提供了可能促进或阻碍员工WLP意识的各种因素的理论整合。我们的研究结果表明,组织应该努力识别这些不平等,并提供应对这些不平等的方法,例如通过提供其他形式的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Making low-wage work and family fit: Perceptions and strategies among working families. Does the marital pay gap matter? Women’s family-work experiences by earning pattern and ethnic community ‘It’s just my personality.' How employees make sense of their long work hours in a supportive workplace Rational or emotional decisions? Parents’ nonstandard work hours and the justifications for using informal childcare ‘I walk around with a list in my head’: qualitative research on perceived causes and consequences of the unequal gender division of mental labor in Croatian households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1