Branding the “wow-academy”: The risks of promotional culture and quasi-corporate communication in higher education

Q3 Social Sciences Studies in Communication Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-12 DOI:10.24434/j.scoms.2022.03.3285
Esa Väliverronen, Tanja Sihvonen, Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, M. Koskela
{"title":"Branding the “wow-academy”: The risks of promotional culture and quasi-corporate communication in higher education","authors":"Esa Väliverronen, Tanja Sihvonen, Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, M. Koskela","doi":"10.24434/j.scoms.2022.03.3285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the branding of the new Tampere University in Finland and the reactions it evoked in Finnish social media and news media between 2018–2020. The merger of the University of Tampere and Tampere University of Technology into a new foundation-based university provoked considerable public debate and sparked uproar over the communication style and practices of the university’s new management. The main reason for the outcry was that the new governance model of the university ignored the traditional democratic way of running a university. Our article contributes to the growing literature on public relations communication in higher education by focusing on promotional culture and the role of the changing media landscape in university branding. We analyze how and why the brand messages were contested and transformed into memes and satirical commentaries on social media. When the university’s management tried to restrain this subversive play with legal sanctions, the issue escalated into the news media. Our qualitative analysis demonstrates the possible repercussions of a quasi-corporate style of communication on the credibility of the university as a higher education institution in a hybrid media environment.","PeriodicalId":38434,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Communication Sciences","volume":"170 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Communication Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.03.3285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article examines the branding of the new Tampere University in Finland and the reactions it evoked in Finnish social media and news media between 2018–2020. The merger of the University of Tampere and Tampere University of Technology into a new foundation-based university provoked considerable public debate and sparked uproar over the communication style and practices of the university’s new management. The main reason for the outcry was that the new governance model of the university ignored the traditional democratic way of running a university. Our article contributes to the growing literature on public relations communication in higher education by focusing on promotional culture and the role of the changing media landscape in university branding. We analyze how and why the brand messages were contested and transformed into memes and satirical commentaries on social media. When the university’s management tried to restrain this subversive play with legal sanctions, the issue escalated into the news media. Our qualitative analysis demonstrates the possible repercussions of a quasi-corporate style of communication on the credibility of the university as a higher education institution in a hybrid media environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“哇学院”的品牌化:高等教育中促销文化和准企业传播的风险
本文考察了2018-2020年芬兰新坦佩雷大学的品牌推广及其在芬兰社交媒体和新闻媒体上引起的反应。坦佩雷大学和坦佩雷理工大学合并为一所新的基础大学,引发了相当大的公众争论,并引发了对大学新管理层的沟通方式和做法的骚动。抗议的主要原因是新的大学治理模式忽视了传统的民主治校方式。我们的文章通过关注宣传文化和不断变化的媒体景观在大学品牌中的作用,为越来越多的高等教育公共关系传播文献做出了贡献。我们分析了品牌信息如何以及为什么受到质疑,并在社交媒体上转化为表情包和讽刺评论。当大学管理层试图用法律制裁来遏制这种颠覆性的行为时,这个问题升级为新闻媒体。我们的定性分析表明,在混合媒体环境下,准公司式的沟通方式可能对大学作为高等教育机构的可信度产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Communication Sciences
Studies in Communication Sciences Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Botlitica: A generative AI-based tool to assist journalists in navigating political propaganda campaigns Iconic image clusters: Significance, structure, and analysis Images, clusters and types – Making sense of (large) image corpora and related practices in and with digital media From party to pandemic – Frames and metaphors in the news coverage of the COVID-19 outbreak in Austria Image types revisited. A texto-material approach for creating image types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1