R. Fausto, D. As, A. Ahlstrøm, S. Andersen, M. L. Andersen, M. Citterio, K. Edelvang, S. H. Larsen, H. Machguth, S. Nielsen, A. Weidick
{"title":"Ablation observations for 2008-2011 from the Programme for Monitoring of the Greenland Ice Sheet (PROMICE)","authors":"R. Fausto, D. As, A. Ahlstrøm, S. Andersen, M. L. Andersen, M. Citterio, K. Edelvang, S. H. Larsen, H. Machguth, S. Nielsen, A. Weidick","doi":"10.34194/GEUSB.V26.4765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent estimates from the glaciological community agree that the Greenland ice sheet is losing mass at an accelerated pace due to climate change (Velicogna 2009; Khan et al. 2010; Rignot et al. 2011). This has caught the attention of the public and policy makers due to the potential impact on sea-level rise (Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009). The mass loss can be attributed approximately equally to increases in meltwater runoff from surface melt and iceberg production (van den Broeke et al. 2009). The robustness of mass-balance predictions relies heavily on observational data from the Greenland ice sheet and in recent years the need for frequent, reliable surface mass-balance measurements has increased (IPCC 2007; Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009). In anticipation of this need, the Programme for Monitoring of the Greenland Ice Sheet (PROMICE) was initiated in 2007, delivering in situ data from a network of automatic weather stations (AWS) covering eight different regions of the ice sheet (Fig. 1; van As et al. 2011). Apart from the direct insight into the surface mass balance provided by these stations, the in situ data are also valuable for calibrating and validating melt estimates from remote sensors and surface mass-balance models (Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009). In this paper, we present the ablation records for the PROMICE AWSs for 2008–2011, and the impact of the extraordinary atmospheric conditions on ablation in 2010 (Tedesco et al. 2011) are compared to the other years.","PeriodicalId":49199,"journal":{"name":"Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin","volume":"6 1","pages":"73-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1969-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34194/GEUSB.V26.4765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
Recent estimates from the glaciological community agree that the Greenland ice sheet is losing mass at an accelerated pace due to climate change (Velicogna 2009; Khan et al. 2010; Rignot et al. 2011). This has caught the attention of the public and policy makers due to the potential impact on sea-level rise (Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009). The mass loss can be attributed approximately equally to increases in meltwater runoff from surface melt and iceberg production (van den Broeke et al. 2009). The robustness of mass-balance predictions relies heavily on observational data from the Greenland ice sheet and in recent years the need for frequent, reliable surface mass-balance measurements has increased (IPCC 2007; Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009). In anticipation of this need, the Programme for Monitoring of the Greenland Ice Sheet (PROMICE) was initiated in 2007, delivering in situ data from a network of automatic weather stations (AWS) covering eight different regions of the ice sheet (Fig. 1; van As et al. 2011). Apart from the direct insight into the surface mass balance provided by these stations, the in situ data are also valuable for calibrating and validating melt estimates from remote sensors and surface mass-balance models (Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009). In this paper, we present the ablation records for the PROMICE AWSs for 2008–2011, and the impact of the extraordinary atmospheric conditions on ablation in 2010 (Tedesco et al. 2011) are compared to the other years.
冰川学界最近的估计一致认为,由于气候变化,格陵兰冰盖正在加速失去质量(Velicogna 2009;Khan et al. 2010;Rignot et al. 2011)。由于对海平面上升的潜在影响,这引起了公众和决策者的注意(Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009)。质量损失可以大致相等地归因于表面融化和冰山产生的融水径流的增加(van den Broeke et al. 2009)。质量平衡预测的稳健性在很大程度上依赖于格陵兰冰盖的观测数据,近年来对频繁、可靠的地表质量平衡测量的需求有所增加(IPCC 2007;Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009)。考虑到这一需求,2007年启动了格陵兰冰盖监测计划(PROMICE),从覆盖冰盖8个不同区域的自动气象站(AWS)网络提供现场数据(图1;van As et al. 2011)。除了这些站点提供的对地表质量平衡的直接洞察之外,现场数据对于校准和验证来自遥感器和地表质量平衡模型的熔体估计也很有价值(Dahl-Jensen et al. 2009)。在本文中,我们提供了2008-2011年PROMICE AWSs的烧蚀记录,并将2010年异常大气条件对烧蚀的影响(Tedesco et al. 2011)与其他年份进行了比较。
期刊介绍:
GEUS Bulletin publishes geoscience research papers, monographs and map descriptions with a focus on Denmark, Greenland and the wider North Atlantic and Arctic region. We welcome submissions that fit this remit. Specifically, we publish:
1.Short articles intended as rapid communications that are of immediate interest to the international geoscience community (these include new research, datasets, methods or reviews)
2.Regular-length articles that document new research or a review of a topic of interest
3.Monographs (single volume works, by arrangement with the editorial office)
4.Maps and descriptive texts (produced by GEUS for Greenland and Denmark, by arrangement with the editorial office)
GEUS Bulletin serves a broad geoscientific readership from research, industry, government agencies, NGOs and special interest groups.