​Defining assessment standards for a new national tertiary-level qualification

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS Studies in Language Assessment Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.58379/cthx3423
J. Read
{"title":"​Defining assessment standards for a new national tertiary-level qualification","authors":"J. Read","doi":"10.58379/cthx3423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this era of public accountability, defining levels of performance for assessment purposes has become a major consideration for educational institutions. It was certainly true of the development by the national qualifications authority of the New Zealand Certificates of English Language (NZCEL), a five-level sequence of awards for learners of English as an additional language at the post-secondary level implemented in 2014. The process of defining the five levels involved benchmarking of standards both nationally and internationally, particularly in relation to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). This paper presents an outsider’s view of the definition of standards for the NZCEL, based on information provided by key participants at the national and local levels. The process has involved taking account of not only the CEFR but also the New Zealand Qualifications Framework (NZQF) and the band score levels of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS). The paper focuses in particular on the issue of establishing the equivalence of NZCEL 4 (Academic) to other recognised measures of English language proficiency as an admission requirement to undergraduate study for international students. The benchmarking process was both multi-faceted and open-ended, in that several issues remain unresolved as implementation of programmes leading to the NZCEL 4 (Academic) has proceeded. At the time of writing, the NZCEL qualifications are scheduled for a formal review and the paper concludes with a discussion of the issues that ideally should be addressed in evaluating the qualification to date.","PeriodicalId":29650,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language Assessment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58379/cthx3423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this era of public accountability, defining levels of performance for assessment purposes has become a major consideration for educational institutions. It was certainly true of the development by the national qualifications authority of the New Zealand Certificates of English Language (NZCEL), a five-level sequence of awards for learners of English as an additional language at the post-secondary level implemented in 2014. The process of defining the five levels involved benchmarking of standards both nationally and internationally, particularly in relation to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). This paper presents an outsider’s view of the definition of standards for the NZCEL, based on information provided by key participants at the national and local levels. The process has involved taking account of not only the CEFR but also the New Zealand Qualifications Framework (NZQF) and the band score levels of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS). The paper focuses in particular on the issue of establishing the equivalence of NZCEL 4 (Academic) to other recognised measures of English language proficiency as an admission requirement to undergraduate study for international students. The benchmarking process was both multi-faceted and open-ended, in that several issues remain unresolved as implementation of programmes leading to the NZCEL 4 (Academic) has proceeded. At the time of writing, the NZCEL qualifications are scheduled for a formal review and the paper concludes with a discussion of the issues that ideally should be addressed in evaluating the qualification to date.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定新的国家三级资格考核标准
在这个公共问责的时代,为评估目的确定绩效水平已成为教育机构的主要考虑因素。国家资格认证机构新西兰英语语言证书(NZCEL)的发展无疑是正确的,这是一个五个级别的奖励,用于在2014年实施的高等教育阶段将英语作为额外语言的学习者。确定五个级别的过程涉及国家和国际标准的基准,特别是关于欧洲共同参考框架(CEFR)。本文根据国家和地方层面的主要参与者提供的信息,介绍了NZCEL标准定义的局外人观点。这一过程不仅考虑了CEFR,还考虑了新西兰资格框架(NZQF)和国际英语语言测试系统(雅思)的成绩水平。本文特别关注的问题是建立NZCEL 4(学术)与其他公认的英语语言能力标准的等效性,作为国际学生本科学习的入学要求。基准测试过程是多方面的,也是开放式的,因为随着NZCEL 4(学术)项目的实施,一些问题仍未解决。在撰写本文时,NZCEL资格已被安排进行正式审查,论文最后讨论了迄今为止在评估资格时理想情况下应该解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contextual variables in written assessment feedback in a university-level Spanish program The effect of in-class and one-on-one video feedback on EFL learners’ English public speaking competency and anxiety Gebril, A. (Ed.) Learning-Oriented Language Assessment: Putting Theory into Practice. Is the devil you know better? Testwiseness and eliciting evidence of interactional competence in familiar versus unfamiliar triadic speaking tasks The meaningfulness of two curriculum-based national tests of English as a foreign language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1