Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein in an interview with Dr. Roman Jaeschke.

H. Gerstein, R. Jaeschke
{"title":"Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein in an interview with Dr. Roman Jaeschke.","authors":"H. Gerstein, R. Jaeschke","doi":"10.20452/pamw.3612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"803 of coronary narrowing. These people were randomized to either placebo or a drug called empagliflozin, and they were actually randomized to 2 different doses of empagliflozin, either 10 mg or 25 mg. The primary analysis was to compare the placebo group to the combined both-doses group. The study continued for 3.1 years, patients were seen periodically, and as I said, it was a blinded study, so investigators were told to manage the patients’ blood pressure, lipids, and glucose levels to the best of their abilities, obviously unaware of the drug the people were taking. At the end of a median follow -up of 3.1 years, the study ended and the results were presented at the European diabetes meeting in September. They showed that people randomized to empagliflozin had a 14%—very significant—reduction in the composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. Even more interesting and more striking was that there was a totally independent reduction in death from all causes as well as death from cardiovascular causes, and a 30% to 35% reduction additionally in death from heart failure with no major effect on myocardial infarction or stroke alone. This study is very unique in that it really showed a very clear benefit of this glucose-lowering drug on serious health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":20343,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","volume":"4 1","pages":"803-805"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

803 of coronary narrowing. These people were randomized to either placebo or a drug called empagliflozin, and they were actually randomized to 2 different doses of empagliflozin, either 10 mg or 25 mg. The primary analysis was to compare the placebo group to the combined both-doses group. The study continued for 3.1 years, patients were seen periodically, and as I said, it was a blinded study, so investigators were told to manage the patients’ blood pressure, lipids, and glucose levels to the best of their abilities, obviously unaware of the drug the people were taking. At the end of a median follow -up of 3.1 years, the study ended and the results were presented at the European diabetes meeting in September. They showed that people randomized to empagliflozin had a 14%—very significant—reduction in the composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. Even more interesting and more striking was that there was a totally independent reduction in death from all causes as well as death from cardiovascular causes, and a 30% to 35% reduction additionally in death from heart failure with no major effect on myocardial infarction or stroke alone. This study is very unique in that it really showed a very clear benefit of this glucose-lowering drug on serious health outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恩格列净、心血管结局和2型糖尿病的死亡率。赫策尔·格斯坦博士在接受罗曼·杰斯克博士的采访时说。
803冠状动脉狭窄。这些人被随机分到安慰剂组和恩帕列净组,他们被随机分到两种不同剂量的恩帕列净组,分别是10毫克和25毫克。主要的分析是比较安慰剂组和双剂量联合组。这项研究持续了3.1年,患者定期接受检查,正如我所说,这是一项盲法研究,因此调查人员被告知要尽其所能控制患者的血压、血脂和血糖水平,显然不知道患者服用的是什么药物。中位随访期为3.1年,研究结束,研究结果在9月的欧洲糖尿病会议上公布。他们发现,随机接受恩格列净治疗的患者在非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性中风或心血管原因死亡的综合结果中降低了14%,这是非常显著的。更有趣,更惊人的是,所有原因导致的死亡和心血管原因导致的死亡都有完全独立的减少,心力衰竭导致的死亡也有30%到35%的额外减少,而心肌梗死或中风没有主要影响。这项研究非常独特,因为它确实显示了这种降血糖药物对严重健康结果的非常明确的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Relapsing polychondritis]. [Inclusion body myositis]. [Nephrotic syndrome]. [Mesangium]. [Hepatorenal syndrome].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1