Jayaram Vidyulatha, T. Pramodkumar, R. Pradeepa, M. Deepa, S. Poongothai, U. Venkatesan, G. Aarthi, Somasundaram Thenmozhi, R. Anjana, V. Mohan
{"title":"Prevalence and impact of stress among individuals with type 2 diabetes attending a tertiary diabetes center in South India","authors":"Jayaram Vidyulatha, T. Pramodkumar, R. Pradeepa, M. Deepa, S. Poongothai, U. Venkatesan, G. Aarthi, Somasundaram Thenmozhi, R. Anjana, V. Mohan","doi":"10.4103/jod.jod_12_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives: Diabetes is a chronic health condition proving to be a major health challenge globally. Being a lifestyle-related disorder, psychosocial and behavioral factors are critical for its management, among which stress plays a contributory role. Diabetes is associated with increased risk of depression, anxiety, and stress due to its debilitating nature and complications. Stress not only affects glycemic control through biological pathways but also leads to unhealthy behavior such as binge eating, smoking, and alcohol. This study attempts to fill the lacuna between clinical and psychosocial aspects of stress and thereby determines the prevalence and impact of stress among type 2 diabetes individuals in a clinic population. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional, case–control study that includes individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well as those with normal glucose tolerance. Assessment of stress was done using a validated tool, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (stress component). Sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometry, blood pressure, and biochemical parameters were collected in all the participants. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences statistical software. Results: The prevalence of stress was significantly higher in T2DM compared to normal glucose tolerance (NGT; 43% vs 13%, P < .001). Both among T2DM and NGT, stress levels were higher in younger individuals with higher education, higher income levels, and professionals. Stress scores decreased with age at diagnosis of T2DM (16.6 [≤25 years] vs 15.6 [≥26–40 years] vs 12.7 [≥41 years], P < .001). T2DM was significantly associated with stress after adjusting for confounding factors. Conclusion: Individuals with T2DM had significantly higher prevalence of stress. Regular screening of stress could lead to better glycemic control.","PeriodicalId":15627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetology","volume":"46 1","pages":"122 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jod.jod_12_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Aims and Objectives: Diabetes is a chronic health condition proving to be a major health challenge globally. Being a lifestyle-related disorder, psychosocial and behavioral factors are critical for its management, among which stress plays a contributory role. Diabetes is associated with increased risk of depression, anxiety, and stress due to its debilitating nature and complications. Stress not only affects glycemic control through biological pathways but also leads to unhealthy behavior such as binge eating, smoking, and alcohol. This study attempts to fill the lacuna between clinical and psychosocial aspects of stress and thereby determines the prevalence and impact of stress among type 2 diabetes individuals in a clinic population. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional, case–control study that includes individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well as those with normal glucose tolerance. Assessment of stress was done using a validated tool, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (stress component). Sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometry, blood pressure, and biochemical parameters were collected in all the participants. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences statistical software. Results: The prevalence of stress was significantly higher in T2DM compared to normal glucose tolerance (NGT; 43% vs 13%, P < .001). Both among T2DM and NGT, stress levels were higher in younger individuals with higher education, higher income levels, and professionals. Stress scores decreased with age at diagnosis of T2DM (16.6 [≤25 years] vs 15.6 [≥26–40 years] vs 12.7 [≥41 years], P < .001). T2DM was significantly associated with stress after adjusting for confounding factors. Conclusion: Individuals with T2DM had significantly higher prevalence of stress. Regular screening of stress could lead to better glycemic control.
目的和目标:糖尿病是一种慢性健康状况,是全球面临的主要健康挑战。作为一种与生活方式相关的疾病,心理社会和行为因素对其治疗至关重要,其中压力起着重要作用。由于糖尿病的衰弱性和并发症,它与抑郁、焦虑和压力的风险增加有关。压力不仅通过生物途径影响血糖控制,还会导致不健康的行为,如暴饮暴食、吸烟和酗酒。本研究试图填补临床和社会心理方面的压力之间的空白,从而确定临床人群中2型糖尿病患者的压力患病率和影响。材料和方法:这是一项横断面、病例对照研究,包括2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者和糖耐量正常的患者。压力评估使用一种有效的工具,抑郁焦虑压力量表-21(压力成分)。收集所有参与者的社会人口学特征、人体测量、血压和生化参数。使用Statistical Package for Social Sciences统计软件对数据进行分析。结果:T2DM患者的应激患病率明显高于正常糖耐量(NGT;43% vs 13%, P < 0.001)。在T2DM和NGT中,受过高等教育、收入水平较高的年轻人和专业人士的压力水平较高。T2DM诊断时,应激评分随年龄的增长而下降(16.6[≤25岁]vs 15.6[≥26-40岁]vs 12.7[≥41岁],P < 0.001)。调整混杂因素后,T2DM与应激显著相关。结论:T2DM患者的应激患病率明显高于T2DM患者。定期检查压力可以更好地控制血糖。