Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Elderly Patients: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center from Developing Country

{"title":"Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Elderly Patients: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center from Developing Country","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/coa.06.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study: To assess the outcome of Percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly in terms of success and complications. Methods: Retrospective data review of 887 consecutive cases of percutaneous interventions done at Karachi institute of heart diseases from 2015-2020. We divided the patients in three age groups younger (<65 years, n=592); older (65 to 75 years, n=201); and elderly (>=75 years, n=94). Immediate and six months outcomes of in hospital vascular complications, death, myocardial infarction, repeat target lesion revascularization and stroke were compared between these groups. Result: The vascular complications was in three groups (relative risk 3.2% vs 2.9% vs 4.3% with p=0.56) respectively. The relative risk of periprocedural Myocardial infarction in elderly/older patients was not higher than young patients with (OR of 0.6 with 95% CI 0.3 vs 1.4 with P=0.35), so was the need of repeat target revascularization with (OR of 0.3 95% CI 0.2 vs -1.6 with P=0.85), the risk of stroke following procedure was minimal (OR of 0.7 95% CI 0.4 vs 1.6 P=0.4). The in-hospital mortality was higher in elderly with (OR with 95% CI 1.0 vs 2.0 vs 3.4 P=0.03) in three groups. The six months outcomes of myocardial infarction in elderly were also not higher than younger pts (OR 0.7 vs 0.4 P=0.58). so was the need for repeat target revascularization (OR 0.5 vs 0.3 P=0.6). The six-month mortality in three groups was high in elderly (OR with 95% CI 1.5% vs 3.4% vs 4% with P value of 0.04). Conclusion: The procedure success in elderly patients was similar to younger patients, but in hospital and six months mortality was higher in elderlies.","PeriodicalId":93027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/coa.06.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective of the study: To assess the outcome of Percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly in terms of success and complications. Methods: Retrospective data review of 887 consecutive cases of percutaneous interventions done at Karachi institute of heart diseases from 2015-2020. We divided the patients in three age groups younger (<65 years, n=592); older (65 to 75 years, n=201); and elderly (>=75 years, n=94). Immediate and six months outcomes of in hospital vascular complications, death, myocardial infarction, repeat target lesion revascularization and stroke were compared between these groups. Result: The vascular complications was in three groups (relative risk 3.2% vs 2.9% vs 4.3% with p=0.56) respectively. The relative risk of periprocedural Myocardial infarction in elderly/older patients was not higher than young patients with (OR of 0.6 with 95% CI 0.3 vs 1.4 with P=0.35), so was the need of repeat target revascularization with (OR of 0.3 95% CI 0.2 vs -1.6 with P=0.85), the risk of stroke following procedure was minimal (OR of 0.7 95% CI 0.4 vs 1.6 P=0.4). The in-hospital mortality was higher in elderly with (OR with 95% CI 1.0 vs 2.0 vs 3.4 P=0.03) in three groups. The six months outcomes of myocardial infarction in elderly were also not higher than younger pts (OR 0.7 vs 0.4 P=0.58). so was the need for repeat target revascularization (OR 0.5 vs 0.3 P=0.6). The six-month mortality in three groups was high in elderly (OR with 95% CI 1.5% vs 3.4% vs 4% with P value of 0.04). Conclusion: The procedure success in elderly patients was similar to younger patients, but in hospital and six months mortality was higher in elderlies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自发展中国家三级保健中心的经验
目的:评价老年人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成功率和并发症。方法:回顾性分析卡拉奇心脏病研究所2015-2020年连续887例经皮介入治疗的资料。我们将患者分为三个年龄较小的组(75岁,n=94)。比较两组患者住院血管并发症、死亡、心肌梗死、重复靶区血管重建术和卒中的即时和6个月预后。结果:三组患者血管并发症发生率分别为3.2%、2.9%、4.3%,p=0.56。老年/老年患者围手术期心肌梗死的相对风险不高于年轻患者(OR为0.6,95% CI为0.3 vs . 1.4, P=0.35),需要重复靶血运重建的患者(OR为0.3,95% CI为0.2 vs . -1.6, P=0.85),手术后卒中的风险最小(OR为0.7,95% CI为0.4 vs . 1.6 P=0.4)。三组老年人住院死亡率均较高(95% CI 1.0 vs 2.0 vs 3.4 P=0.03)。老年患者心肌梗死6个月预后也不高于年轻患者(OR 0.7 vs 0.4 P=0.58)。重复目标血运重建术的需要也同样如此(OR 0.5 vs 0.3 P=0.6)。三组老年人6个月死亡率均较高(OR为95% CI 1.5% vs 3.4% vs 4%, P值为0.04)。结论:老年患者的手术成功率与年轻患者相似,但住院和6个月死亡率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cross-Sectional, Non-Randomized, Single-Blinded, and Single-Center Study for the Accuracy of 12 Lead Smartphone ECG in the Detection of Ventricular Arrhythmias A Single Blinded, Cross-Sectional, Single-Center Study for the Validation of Atrial Fibrillation Detection using Spandan Smartphone ECG Bridging Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy with a Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Case Report of Protruded Implantable Cardiac Device through Chest in 50 Years Old Male Giant Hematoma of Rectus Abdominis Muscle in a Patient with Schistosomiasis without Periportal Abnormalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1